Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 15, Supplement 1, pp 57–65 | Cite as

Sexual Pleasure and Intimacy Among Men Who Engage in “Bareback Sex”

  • Alex Carballo-DiéguezEmail author
  • Ana Ventuneac
  • Gary W. Dowsett
  • Ivan Balan
  • José Bauermeister
  • Robert H. Remien
  • Curtis Dolezal
  • Rebecca Giguere
  • Marina Mabragaña
Original Paper

Abstract

An ethnically diverse sample of 120 mostly gay-identified men who engaged in “bareback” intercourse was recruited via the Internet in New York City. By study design three quarters of participants were HIV-uninfected and engaged in condomless receptive anal intercourse. In the course of face-to-face in-depth interviews, participants were asked what led them to have their first bareback experience as well as to continue with the behavior. Qualitative analysis identified the pivotal role that sexual pleasure and intimacy have in this population and how drives for sexual satisfaction, adventure, intimacy, and love overpower health concerns and condom use recommendations. Men interested in bareback sex use a variety of defense mechanisms to account for, justify, and exonerate their behavior. HIV-prevention interventions have paid insufficient attention to libidinal drives, a crucial element of psychological functioning.

Keywords

Bareback Gay Homosexual Risk 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a grant from the US National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH69333; Principal Investigator: Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Ph.D.).

References

  1. 1.
    Berg RC. Barebacking: a review of the literature. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(5):754–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carballo-Diéguez A, Bauermeister J. “Barebacking”: intentional condomless anal sex in HIV-risk contexts. Reasons for and against it. J Homosex. 2004;47(1):1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Bauermeister J, et al. Is “bareback” a useful construct in primary HIV-prevention. Definitions, identity, and research. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11(1):51–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suarez T, Miller J. Negotiating risks in context: a perspective on unprotected anal intercourse and barebacking among men who have sex with men–where do we go from here? Arch Sex Behav. 2001;30(3):287–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. In: Gauvain M, Cole M, editors. International encyclopedia of education, vol. 3. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 1994. p. 1643–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freud S. Das Ich und das Es. Leipzig, Germany: Internationaler Psycho-analytischer, 1923; English translation, The Ego and the Id. London: Hogarth Press, 1927. In: Strachey J, editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 19. Toronto: Clarke, Irwin and Company; 1961. p. 12–27.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bettelheim B. Freud and man’s soul. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freud S. New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: W.W. Norton; 1933.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carballo-Diéguez A, Dowsett G, Ventuneac A, et al. Cybercartography of popular Internet sites used by New York City men who have sex with men interested in bareback sex. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18(6):475–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dowsett G, Williams H, Ventuneac A, Carballo-Diéguez A. “Taking it like a man”: masculinity and barebacking online. Sexualities. 2008;11(1):121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bauermeister JA, Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Dolezal C. Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV risk contexts (“Bareback Sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(2):156–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hruschka DJ, Schwartz D, St John DC, Picone-Decaro E, Jenkins RA, Carey JW. Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods. 2004;16:307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Is risky sex rational? J Sex Res. 1992;29(4):561–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nodin N, Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Balan I, Remien R. Knowledge and acceptability of alternative HIV prevention bio-medical products among MSM who bareback. AIDS Care. 2008;20(1):106–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crossley ML. Making sense of “barebacking”: gay men’s narratives, unsafe sex and the “resistance habitus”. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004;43(Pt 2):225–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crossley ML. The perils of health promotion and the ‘barebacking’ backlash. Health. 2002;6:47–68.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holmes D, Warner D. The anatomy of a forbidden desire: men, penetration and semen exchange. Nurs Inq. 2005;12(1):10–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Carballo-Diéguez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Ventuneac
    • 2
  • Gary W. Dowsett
    • 3
  • Ivan Balan
    • 1
  • José Bauermeister
    • 4
  • Robert H. Remien
    • 1
  • Curtis Dolezal
    • 1
  • Rebecca Giguere
    • 1
  • Marina Mabragaña
    • 1
  1. 1.HIV Center for Clinical & Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Center for HIV Educational Studies & Training (CHEST)Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY)New YorkUSA
  3. 3.Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Public Health, University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations