AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 34–37 | Cite as

The Concurrency Hypothesis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Convincing Empirical Evidence is Still Lacking. Response to Mah and Halperin, Epstein, and Morris



  1. 1.
    Abu-Raddad LJ, Longini IM. No HIV stage is dominant in driving the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2008;22(9):1055–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caraël M. Sexual behaviour. In: Cleland JG, Ferry B, editors. Sexual behaviour and AIDS in the developing world. London: Taylor & Francis, World Health Organization; 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein H. The mathematics of concurrent partnerships in Africa’s HIV epidemics: a response to Lurie and Rosenthal. AIDS Behav. Epub ahead of print. 2009. doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9627-x.
  4. 4.
    Halperin D, Epstein H. Concurrent sexual partnerships help to explain Africa’s high HIV prevalence: implications for prevention. Lancet. 2004;364(9428):4–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollingsworth TD, Anderson RM, Fraser C. HIV-1 transmission, by stage of infection. J Infect Dis. 2008;198(5):687–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelvin, L. Popular lectures and addresses, 1891–1894. Quoted in Weiner J, editor. The Beak of the Finch. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kretzschmar M, White RG, Carael M. (in press). Concurrency is more complex than it seems. AIDS. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333eb9d.
  8. 8.
    Lurie M, Rosenthal S. Concurrent partnerships as the driver of the HIV epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa? The evidence is limited. AIDS Behav. Epub ahead of print. 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9853-5.
  9. 9.
    Mah T, Halperin D. Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS Behav. Epub ahead of print. 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9433-x.
  10. 10.
    Mah T, Halperin D. The evidence for the role of concurrent partnerships in Africa’s HIV epidemics: a response to Lurie and Rosenthal. AIDS Behav. doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9617-z.
  11. 11.
    Morris M. Barking up the wrong evidence tree. Comment on Lurie and Rosenthal, “Concurrent partnerships as a driver of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa? The evidence is limited.” AIDS Behav. (in press).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris M, Kretzschmar M. A microsimulation study of the effect of concurrent partnerships on the spread of HIV in Uganda. Math Popul Stud. 2000;8(2):109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilcher CD, Tien HC, Eron JJ, Vernazza PL, Leu SY, Stewart PW, et al. Brief but efficient: acute HIV infection and the sexual transmission of HIV. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(10):1785–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rapatski BL, Suppe F, Yorke JA. HIV epidemics driven by late stage transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(3):241–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reniers G, Watkins S. Polygyny and the spread of HIV in Sub Saharan Africa: a case of benign concurrency. AIDS. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333af03.
  16. 16.
    Tanser F, Barnighausen T, McGrath N, Garnett G, Newell ML. Levels of partnership concurrency and risk of HIV acquisition in a high-prevalence, rural South African population. Paper forthcoming at EPIDEMICS2: the Second International Conference on Infectious Disease Dynamics, Athens, Greece, December 2–4, 2009. (in press).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    UNAIDS. (2007) UNAIDS response to newly published book “The Invisible Cure” by Helen Epstein. Available at:
  18. 18.
    Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E, et al. Sexual behavior in context: a global perspective. Lancet. 2006;368:1706–28. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69479-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community Health, International Health InstituteWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations