Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Even If You Build It, We May Not Come: Correlates of Non-attendance at a Sexual Risk Reduction Workshop for STD Clinic Patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual risk reduction interventions have been shown to reduce sexual risk behavior; however, attendance at these interventions is sometimes disappointingly low. To improve recruitment efforts, we investigated whether patient characteristics were associated with non-attendance at a single-session, sexual risk reduction intervention. Patients from an STD clinic (N = 990; 48% female; 64% African American) who were eligible and who agreed to participate in a randomized, clinical trial were invited to a 4-h, sexual risk reduction workshop. Fifty-six percent of those who were invited attended the workshop. Those who did not attend were more likely to be younger, male, Caucasian, and employed. Attendance did not differ as a function of sexual behavior or infection status. These findings identify the population sub-groups who are likely to require special effort to attract to a workshop. We encourage more effective marketing and recruitment approaches for sexual risk reduction programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Much of the evidence for poor attendance has been anecdotal because investigators have not reported the percentage of participants who attend. In addition, some investigators randomize participants to intervention conditions only after they arrive for a workshop. These reporting and methodological factors have obscured attendance rates. Fortunately, with the CONSORT reporting requirements [Moher, Schulz, & Altman, 2001], we will have better data regarding true attendance rates in the future.

  2. Fifty-five participants who were invited to the workshop without promise of a monetary incentive were considered pilot participants, and were not included in these analyses.

  3. Participants who arrived ≥30 min late were not allowed to attend the workshop that week; in this event, they were invited to the next scheduled workshop. If they failed to attend the original workshop and the make-up workshop, they were classified as non-attendees.

  4. Results were unchanged when we used a behavioral definition of sexual orientation, that is, those who reported having intercourse with someone of the same gender in the past 3 months were defined as homosexual or bisexual.

  5. Because the sexual behavioral data were skewed, supplementary analyses using non-parametric tests were conducted. Results were largely consistent with results from the ANOVAs, with one exception; in the nonparametric analyses, non-attendees reported a greater number of lifetime partners than did attendees, χ2(1, N = 989) = 5.88, P < .05. Additionally, we conducted analyses on several dichotomous indicators of sexual risk, including: (a) whether or not a condom was used at last intercourse; (b) whether or not participants engaged in any unprotected intercourse with their steady partner over the past 3 months; (c) whether or not participants engaged in any unprotected intercourse with their non-steady partner(s) over the past 3 months; and (d) whether or not participants had more than one sexual partner in the past 3 months. None of these dichotomous indicators of sexual risk were associated with workshop attendance.

  6. Logistic regressions including variables that were marginally significant in the univariate analyses also were conducted (Hosmer & Lemeshow, 2000). Demographic variables were entered into the logistic regression first, followed by sexual behavior variables, and, finally, substance use variables. The sexual behavior and substance use variables did not add significantly to the prediction of workshop attendance.

References

  • Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., Saunders, J. B., & Grant, M. (1992). AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. World Health Organization.

  • Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2005). Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38, 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. P., Braaten, L. S., Maisto, S. A., Gleason, J. R., Forsyth, A. D., & Durant, L. E. (2000). Using information, motivational enhancement, and skills training to reduce the risk of HIV infection for low-income urban women: A second randomized clinical trial. Health Psychology, 19, 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Gordon, C. M., Schroder, K. E., & Vanable, P. A. (2004). Reducing HIV-risk behavior among adults receiving outpatient psychiatric treatment: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 252–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., Kalichman, S. C., Forsyth, A. D., Wright, E. M., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). Enhancing motivation to reduce the risk of HIV infection for economically disadvantaged urban women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 531–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2004. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copenhaver, M. M., Johnson, B. T., Lee, I., Harman, J. J., Carey, M. P., & the SHARP Research Team (2006). Behavioral HIV risk reduction among people who inject drugs: Meta-analytic evidence of efficacy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, N., Horn, A. K., Rama, S. M., Griffin, T., Deluca, J. B., & Mullins, M. M. et al. (2006). The efficacy of behavioral interventions in reducing HIV risk sex behaviors and incident sexually transmitted disease in Black and Hispanic sexually transmitted disease clinic patients in the United States: A meta-analytic review. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 33, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiFranceisco, W., Kelly, J. A., Sikkema, K. J., Somlai, A. M., Murphy, D. A., & Stevenson, L. Y. (1998). Differences between completers and early dropouts from 2 HIV intervention trials: A health belief approach to understanding prevention program attrition. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1068–1073.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Estabrooks, P. A., & Vogt, T. M. (2006). Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: Using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Education Research, 21, 688–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrave, D. R., & Curran, J. W. (2006). What works, and what remains to be done, in HIV prevention in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 261–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemmott, J. B., & Jemmott, L. S. (2000). HIV risk reduction behavioral interventions with heterosexual adolescents. AIDS, 14, S40–S52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T., Carey, M. P., Chaudoir, S. R., & Reid, A. E. (2006). Sexual risk reduction for persons living with HIV: Research synthesis of randomized controlled trials, 1993–2004. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 41, 642–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T., Carey, M. P., Marsh, K. L., Levin, K. D., & Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J. (2003). Interventions to reduce sexual risk for the human immunodeficiency virus in adolescents, 1985–2000: A research synthesis. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 157, 381–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauby, J., Kotranski, L., Feighan, K., Collier, K., Semaan, S., & Halbert, J. (1996). Effects of intervention attrition and research attrition on the evaluation of an HIV prevention program. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 663–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D., & the CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1987–1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedlow, C. T., & Carey, M. P. (2004). Developmentally appropriate sexual risk reduction interventions for adolescents: Rationale, review of interventions, and recommendations for research and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 172–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, R. M., & McKay, M. M. (2006). Lessons learned from African American women about participation in a family-based HIV prevention program. Families in Society, 87, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roffman, R. A., Picciano, J. E., Bolan, M., & Kalichman, S. C. (1997). Factors associated with attrition from an HIV-prevention program for gay and bisexual males. AIDS and Behavior, 1, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, S. E., Roffman, R. A., Picciano, J. E., Kalichman, S. C., & Berghuis, J. P. (2002). HIV prevention and attrition: Challenges and opportunities. AIDS and Behavior, 6, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption - II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schackman, B. R., Gebo, K. A., Walensky, R. P., Losina, E., Muccio, T., Sax, P. E. et al. (2006). The lifetime cost of current human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States. Medical Care, 44, 990–997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shafii, T., & Burstein, G. R. (2004). An overview of sexually transmitted infections among adolescents. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 15, 201–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H. A. (1982). The Drug Abuse Screening Test. Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Lee, M. B., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Swendeman, D. (2006). Predictors of intervention adherence among young people living with HIV. American Journal of Health and Behavior, 30, 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932–1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the Black community. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1498–1505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walitzer, K. S., Dermen, K. H., & Connors, G. J. (1999). Strategies for preparing clients for treatment. Behavior Modification, 23, 129–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserheit, J. (1992). Epidemiological synergy: Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 19, 61–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank everyone who participated in the project, as well as the staff of the Monroe County Health Department clinic, and the HIP-R team. This work was supported by grant # R01-MH54929 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Carey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senn, T.E., Carey, M.P., Vanable, P.A. et al. Even If You Build It, We May Not Come: Correlates of Non-attendance at a Sexual Risk Reduction Workshop for STD Clinic Patients. AIDS Behav 11, 864–871 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9218-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9218-7

Keywords

Navigation