Abstract
Despite 40-year-old evidence of childcare challenges limiting women’s participation in agriculture in the United States, it was not until a major societal crisis, COVID-19, that farm organizations and policy makers began to recognize that these challenges negatively impact the farm enterprise. Among farm persistence and farm transition scholars, farm households’ social and economic needs, including childcare, have also been underappreciated despite the constant exchange of time, money, and energy between the farm household and the enterprise. We use survey responses from 729 U.S. farm families to understand how children and their childcare needs shape the farm enterprise and the extent to which childcare arrangements, farm individuals and households, and farm enterprise characteristics interact with these decisions. A high proportion of respondents made changes to adapt to the needs of children with the greatest impact on farm productivity, followed by impact on the structure of labor on- and off- the farm, and impact on the farm enterprise structure. These impacts likely have short- and long-term consequences on the trajectory of the farm enterprise and well-being of the household. Different decisions required a different calculus and the trade-offs that respondents considered were shaped by access to a support system, access to financial resources, and specific needs of the children. Last, the limited variations across the four decisions for a number of farm individual and household characteristics hint both at the universality of being a farm parent needing to constantly adapt amid high rates of childcare challenges and inadequate social safety nets. We conclude our article by discussing the implications of our findings along with future research avenues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
What constitutes a family farm is not straightforward as evidenced by the literature on the topic (Djurfeldt 1996; Garner and De la O Campos 2014; van Vliet et al. 2015). The USDA strictly defines the family farm based on who owns and operates the means of production. Another defining feature from the literature, which is key to this article, are the interconnections between the production function of the farm business and the reproduction function of the farm household along with the combination of resources between the farm business and the farm household (Contzen 2019; Djurfeldt 1996; Garner and De la O Campos 2014). Also important to note is the assumed heteronormative nature of the family farm given the centrality of family formation and children to the reproduction of the family farm. However, in recent years, scholars have noted that such assumption and the omission of LGBTQIA + identities are exclusionary and do not fully represent the diversity of people and family structures in agriculture (Hoffelmeyer et al. 2023; Pfammatter and Jongerden 2023).
References
Adams, J., A. Kennedy, J. Cotton, and S. Brumby. 2022. Utilizing the Delphi method to develop parent and child surveys to understand exposure to farming hazards and attitudes toward farm safety. Frontiers in Public Health 10: 1027426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027426.
Ahearn, M., H. El-Osta, and A. Mishra. 2013. Considerations in work choices of U.S. Farm households: the role of health insurance. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 38(1): 19–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23496736.
Alston, M. 2017. The genderness of climate change, Australia. In Gender and rural globalization: international perspectives on gender and rural development, 100–113. CABI Wallingford UK.
American Farm Bureau Federation. 2023. 2023 Farm Bill Policy Priorities. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.fb.org/files/2023_Farm_Bill_Priorities_outline.pdf.
Barlett, P. 1993. American dreams, rural realities: family farms in crisis. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Becot, F. 2022. Children, work, and safety on the farm during COVID-19: a harder juggling act. Journal of Agromedicine 27(3): 315–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2022.2068716.
Becot, F., and S. Inwood. 2020. The case for integrating household social needs and social policy into the international family farm research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 77: 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.05.005.
Becot, F., and S. Inwood. 2022a. Examining access to health insurance and health care along the life course to shed light on interactions between farm households’ social needs, social policy, and the farm business. Sociologia Ruralis 62(3): 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12394.
Becot, F., and S. Inwood. 2022b. Medical economic vulnerability: a next step in expanding the farm resilience scholarship. Agriculture and Human Values 39: 1097–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10307-4.
Becot, F., S. Inwood, C. Bendixsen, and C. Henning-Smith. 2020. Health care and health insurance access for farm families in the United States during COVID-19: essential workers without essential resources? Journal of Agromedicine 25(4): 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1814924.
Becot, F., S. Inwood, and A. Rissing. 2022. Childcare for farm families: a key strategy to keep children safe yet largely absent from farm programming. Frontiers in Public Health 10: 1043774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043774.
Becot, F., S. Contzen, H. Budge, S. Inwood, K. Tanaka, M. Č. Istenič, and A. Kroeplin. 2023a. A call to update our understanding of family farm persistence and reproduction through a focus on the farm household-farm operation interface. Paper presented at the European Society for Rural Sociology, Rennes, France.
Becot, F., S. Inwood, and E. Buchanan. 2023b. Navigating the ethical and methodological dimensions of a farm safety photovoice project. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20: 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10261-8.
Bell, D. 2000. Farm boys and wild men: rurality, masculinity, and homosexuality. Rural Sociology 65(4): 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00043.x.
Bennett, J., and S. Kohl. 1982. Of time and the enterprise: north American family farm management in a context of resource marginality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Bipartisan Policy Center, & Morning Consult. 2020a. Child care in rural America. Retrieved from https://bipartisanpolicy.org/download/?file=/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2107114_topline_BPC_Rural_Parents_v1_PL.pdf.
Bipartisan Policy Center, & Morning Consult. 2020b. COVID-19: Changes in child care. Retrieved from https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/BPC-Child-Care-Survey_CT-D3.pdf.
Bjorvatn, K., D. Ferris, S. Gulesci, A. Nasgowitz, V. Somville, and L. Vandewalle. 2022. Childcare, labor supply, and business development: Experimental evidence from Uganda.
Boateng, G., T. Neilands, E. Frongillo, H. Melgar-Quiñonez, and S. Young. 2018. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health 6(149): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
Brandth, B., and G. Overrein. 2013. Resourcing children in a changing rural context: Fathering and farm succession in two generations of farmers. Sociologia Ruralis 53(1): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12003.
Brockman, L. 1994. Child care and child safety for farm children in Manitoba. Brandon, CA: Rural Development Institute at Brandon University.
Bruce, A. 2019. Farm entry and persistence: Three pathways into alternative agriculture in southern Ohio. Journal of Rural Studies 69: 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.007.
Bureau of the Census. 2016. Our children’s future: A survey of young children’s care and education. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.
Burton, R., and M. Farstad. 2020. Cultural lock-in and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: The case of dairy/beef farmers in Norway. Sociologia Ruralis 60(1): 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12277.
Burton, R. J., and P. P. Otte. 2022. Promoting climate change mitigation in agriculture: Do we need to account for farm family life-cycle? Journal of Rural Studies 96: 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.006.
Calus, M., and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2010. The persistence of family farming: A review of explanatory socio-economic and historical factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 41(5): 639–660.
Calus, M., G. Van Huylenbroeck, and D. Van Lierde. 2008. The relationship between farm succession and farm assets on Belgian farms. Sociologia Ruralis 48(1): 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00448.x.
Carlson, D. L., R. Petts, and J. Pepin. 2020. US couples’ divisions of housework and childcare during COVID-19 pandemic.
Černič Istenič, M. 2023. Work life balance on a farm with young children Paper presented at the XXIXth European Society for Rural Sociology Congress. Crises and the futures of rural areas, Rennes, France.
Chayanov, A. V. ed. 1966. On the theory of peasant economy. Homewood, IL: The American Economic Association.
Childcare Resource and Research Unit. (n.d.). Child care needs survey. Retrieved from https://childcarecanada.org/sites/default/files/chldneeds.pdf.
Clark, J., D. Munroe, and B. Mansfield. 2010. What counts as farming: how classification limits regionalization of the food system. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 3(2): 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq018.
Coleman, G., and S. Elbert. 1984. Farming families: the farm needs everyone. In Research in rural sociology and development, ed. H. Schwarzweller. vol. 1 61–78. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Colton, D., and R. Covert. 2007. Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. San Fransisco, CA: Wiley.
Contzen, S. ed. 2019. Bäuerliche Familienbetriebe–Eine Vielfalt an Arbeits-Und Lebensformen. Weinfelden, Switzerland: Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarsoziologie.
Djurfeldt, G. 1996. Defining and operationalizing family farming from a sociological perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 36(3): 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00026.x.
Donald, A., and J. Vaillant. 2023. Experimental evidence on rural childcare provision.
Donald, A., J. Vaillant, F. Campos, and M. E. Cucagna. 2018. Caring about carework: lifting constraints to the productivity of women farmers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. World Bank.
Dreby, J., and M. Carr. 2019. Children and the modern farming movement. Sociological Forum 34(4): 904–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12558.
Eriksson, C., and F. Hajdu. 2021. You have to focus all your energy on being a parent: Barriers and opportunities for Swedish farmers to be involved fathers. Journal of Rural Studies 83: 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.020.
Friedmann, H. 1978a. Simple commodity production and wage labour in the American plains. The Journal of Peasant Studies 6(1): 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066157808438066.
Friedmann, H. 1978b. World market, state, and family farm: Social bases of household production in the era of wage labor. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20(04): 545–586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750001255X.
Gale, H. F. 1994. Longitudinal analysis of farm size over the farmer’s life cycle. Review of Agricultural Economics 16(1): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1349526.
Garner, E., and De la O. Campos, A. P. 2014. Identifying the family farm. An informal discussion of the concepts and definitions. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricullture Organization of the United Nations.
Gasson, R. 1973. Goals and values of farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(3): 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1973.tb00952.x.
Gasson, R., and A. Errington. 1993. The farm family business. Cab International.
Gasson, R., G. Crow, A. Errington, J. Hutson, T. Marsden, and D. M. Winter. 1988. The farm as a family business: A review. Journal of Agricultural Economics 39(1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00560.x.
Gillespie, G., and S. E. Johnson. 2010. Success in farm start-ups in the Northeastern United States. Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development 1(1): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.008.
Hall, A., and V. Mogyorody. 2007a. Organic farming, gender, and the labor process. Rural Sociology 72(2): 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170035.
Hall, A., and V. Mogyorody. 2007b. Organic farming, gender, and the labor process. Rural Sociology 72(2): 289.
Hansson, H., R. Ferguson, C. Olofsson, and L. Rantamäki-Lahtinen. 2013. Farmers’ motives for diversifying their farm business– the influence of family. Journal of Rural Studies 32: 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.002.
Hoffelmeyer, M., J. Wypler, and I. Leslie. 2023. Surveying queer farmers: How heteropatriarchy affects farm viability and farmer well-being in US agriculture. Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development 12(3): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.005.
Inwood, S. 2017. Agriculture, health insurance, human capital and economic development at the rural-urban-interface. Journal of Rural Studies 54: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.009.
Inwood, S., and J. Sharp. 2012. Farm persistence and adaptation at the rural–urban interface: succession and farm adjustment. Journal of Rural Studies 28(1): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005.
Inwood, S., and E. Stengel. 2020. Working households: Challenges in balancing young children and the farm enterprise. Community Development 51(5): 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1800772.
Inwood, S., J. Clark, and M. Bean. 2013. The differing values of multigeneration and first-generation farmers: Their influence on the structure of agriculture at the rural‐urban interface. Rural Sociology 78(3): 346–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12012.
Inwood, S., A. Knudson, F. Becot, B. Brown, S. Goetz, J. Kolodinsky, and D. Albrecht. 2018. Health insurance and national farm policy. Choices 33(1): 1–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26487425.
Jackson-Smith, D., T. Woods, S. Inwood, J. Linder, and L. Gallander. 2023. Factors associated with farm survival and exit during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ohio. Paper presented at the Rural Sociolgy Society Annual Conference, Burlington, VT.
Jones, C., and R. Rosenfeld. 1981. American farm women: Findings from a national survey. Retrieved from Chicago, IL: https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdfs/NORCRpt_130.pdf.
Justice, L., A. Ansari, M. Baek, E. Cooksey, B. Singletary, J. Williamson, and A. Hamilton. 2021. Early care and education (ECE) in Franklin County: The ECE landscape study. Columbus, OH: Crane Center for Early Childhood Research and Policy at The Ohio State University.
Katchova, A., and M. Ahearn. 2017. Farm entry and exit from US agriculture. Agricultural Finance Review 77(1): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-03-2016-0021.
Keating, N., and H. Little. 1997. Choosing the successor in New Zealand family farms. Family Business Review 10(2): 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00157.x.
Kennedy, L. 1991. Farm succession in modern Ireland: elements of a theory of inheritance. The Economic History Review 44(3): 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1991.tb01275.x.
Kingwill, S., and H. Dalton. 2005. Current state of play in child care for Australian farming families: Issues, barriers and opportunity for improvement. Moree. Australia: Australian Centre for Agricultural Health and Safety.
Kuhmonen, I. 2020. The resilience of Finnish farms: exploring the interplay between agency and structure. Journal of Rural Studies 80: 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.012.
Larson-Bright, M., S. Gerberich, A. Masten, B. Alexander, J. Gurney, T. Church, and C. Renier. 2009. Parents’ safety beliefs and childhood agricultural injury. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 52(9): 724–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20719.
Lobley, M., and C. Potter. 2004. Agricultural change and restructuring: Recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England. Journal of Rural Studies 20(4): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.07.001.
Lobley, M., J. Baker, and I. Whitehead. eds. 2012. Keeping it in the family: International perspectives on succession and retirement on family farms. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Meuwissen, M., P. Feindt, A. Spiegel, C. Termeer, E. Mathijs, Y. de Mey, and J. Urquhart. 2019. A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems. Agricultural Systems 176: 102656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102656.
National Children’s Center for rural and agricultural health and safety. 2021. Linking childcare to farm children safety. Retrieved from https://marshfieldresearch.org/nccrahs/FarmChildrenChildcare.
National Farmers Union. 2023. 2023 fall legislative fly-in. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://nfu.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Fly-In-2023-Priorities.pdf.
National Children’s Center for rural and agricultural health and safety. 2017. Child/youth agricultural safety checklist. Retrieved from https://cultivatesafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Child-Ag-Safety-Checklist.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2005. Before- and after-school programs and activities survey instrument. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Ogbimi, G. 1992. Enhancing Nigerian rural women’s food production through appropriate child care assistance. Early Child Development and Care 80(1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443920800103.
Pennings, J., S. Irwin, and D. Good. 2002. Surveying farmers: A case study. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 24(1): 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9353.00096.
Perrin, A., M. San Cristobal, R. Milestad, and G. Martin. 2020. Identification of resilience factors of organic dairy cattle farms. Agricultural Systems 183: 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102875.
Peter, G., M. M. Bell, S. K. Jarnagin, and D. Bauer. 2005. Farm dads: Reconstructing fatherhood, the legacy of the land, and family in the fields of the midwest. Situated Fathering a Focus on Physical and Social Spaces, 235–254.
Peterson, J. T. 1994. Household labor and child care needs among Philippine highland farmers. Journal of Anthropological Research 50(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.50.1.3630475.
Pfammatter, P., and J. Jongerden. 2023. Beyond farming women: Queering gender, work and family farms. Agriculture and Human Values 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10449-z.
Potter, C., and M. Lobley. 1992. Ageing and succession on family farms: The impact on decision-making and land use. Sociologia Ruralis 32(2–3): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1992.tb00935.x.
Purschwitz, M., T. Ellis, L. Benetti, and R. Berg. 2008. Personal circumstances, concerns, and needs of women on Wisconsin dairy farms. Marshfield, WI: Marshfield Clinic.
Reid-Musson, E., K. Strauss, and M. Mechler. 2022. A virtuous industry’: the agrarian work-family ethic in US rulemaking on child agricultural labour. Globalizations 19(6): 922–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2031795.
Reinhardt, N., and P. Barlett. 1989. The persistence of family farms in United States agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 29(3–4): 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00367.x.
Rissing, A. 2019. Profitability vs.making it: Causes and consequences of disembedding beginning farms’ finances. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 41(2):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12234.
Rissing, A., S. Inwood, and E. Stengel. 2021. The invisible labor and multidimensional impacts of negotiating childcare on farms. Agriculture and Human Values 38: 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10162-1.
Salamon, S. 1992. Prairie patrimony: family, farming, and community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina.
Shorrod Brown - U.S. Senator for Ohio. 2023. Brown, Marshall lead bill to expand childcare in rural america. Retrieved from https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-marshall-lead-bill-expand-childcare-rural-america.
Shortall, S., L.-A. Sutherland, A. McKee, and J. Hopkins. 2017a. Women in farming and the agriculture sector. Eidinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Government.
Shortall, S., L.-A. Sutherland, A. McKee, and J. Hopkins. 2017b. Women in farming and the agriculture sector. Retrieved from Edinburgh.
Shucksmith, M., and V. Herrmann. 2002. Future changes in British agriculture: Projecting divergent farm household behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(1): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00004.x.
Singleton, R., and B. Straits. 2005. Approches to social research. Fourth ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smithers, J., and P. Johnson. 2004. The dynamics of family farming in North Huron County, Ontario. Part I. Development trajectories. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 48(2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00055.x.
Stenbacka, S. 2017. Where family, farm and society intersect: values of women farmers in Sweden. In Gender and rural globalization: International perspectives on gender and rural development, 114–128. CABI Wallingford UK.
Sureshwaran, S., and S. Ritchie. 2011. US farm bill resources and programs for beginning farmers. Choices 26(2): 3.
Sutherland, L.-A. 2023. Who do we want our ‘new generation’of farmers to be? The need for demographic reform in European agriculture. Agricultural and Food Economics 11(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-023-00244-z.
Sutherland, L.-A., R. J. Burton, J. Ingram, K. Blackstock, B. Slee, and N. Gotts. 2012. Triggering change: towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management 104: 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.013.
Taylor, J. E., J. Norris, and W. Howard. 1998. Succession patterns of farmer and successor in Canadian farm families. Rural Sociology 63(4): 553. https://www.doi.or/. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00692.x.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2017. Census of agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Ulrich-Schad, J., S. Li, J. G. Arbuckle, E. Avemegah, K. Brasier, M. Burnham, and A. Wilkes. 2022. An inventory and assessment of sample sources for survey research with agricultural producers in the US. Society & Natural Resources 35(7): 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2081392.
van Vliet, J., A. Schut, P. Reidsma, K. Descheemaeker, M. Slingerland, G. van de Ven, and K. Giller. 2015. De-mystifying family farming: Features, diversity and trends across the globe. Global food Security 5: 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.03.001.
Vesoulis, A. 2020. 8 Sept.). COVID-19 has nearly destroyed the childcare industry—and it might be too late to save it. Time Magazine. Retrieved from https://time.com/5886491/covid-childcare-daycare/.
Whitt, C., N. Miller, and R. Oliver. 2022. America’s farms and ranches at a glance: 2022 Edition (Vol. 2022). Washington, DC.
Wilk, R., and R. Netting. 1984. Households: changing forms and functions. In Households: comparative and historical studies of the domestic group, eds. R. Netting, R. Wilk, and E. Arnould. 1–28. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Zahl-Thanem, A., R. Burton, and J. Vik. 2021. Should we use email for farm surveys? A comparative study of email and postal survey response rate and non-response bias. Journal of Rural Studies 87: 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.029.
Acknowledgements
We thank the farm families who took the time to answer the survey. We thank the colleagues who provided feedback on the survey instrument as well as Sarah Ruszkowski, Melissa Ploeckelman, and Scott Heiberger for their work in support of the data collection.
Funding
The research underlying this article is supported by the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U54 OH009568-10). The first author's work on this article was also supported by the Steve J. Miller Distinguished Scientist Endowment in Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety Research at the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Becot, F.A., Inwood, S.M. Children needs and childcare: an illustration of how underappreciated social and economic needs shape the farm enterprise. Agric Hum Values (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10594-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10594-z

