The critical environmental justice (CEJ) framework contends that inequalities are sustained through intersecting social categories, multi-scalarity, the perceived expendability of marginalized populations, and state-vested power. While this approach offers new pathways for environmental justice research, it overlooks the role of firms, suggesting a departure from long-standing political-economic theories, such as the treadmill of production (ToP), which elevate the importance of producers. In focusing on firms, we ask: how do firms operationalize diverse social forces to produce environmental injustice? What organizational logics sustain these inequalities? To understand the firm-level dynamics shaping treadmill acceleration and environmental injustice, we utilize two concepts—social embeddedness and managerial authority—from economic sociology research on firms. The former refers to the social and non-economic factors that guide economic decision-making, whereas the latter refers to the power that reinforces worksite hierarchies. This theoretical paper argues that social embeddedness and managerial authority interact within firms to produce an organizational logic that sustains environmental injustice and ecological disorganization. We draw from historical and contemporary evidence on sugarcane plantations in Latin America and the Caribbean, with cases ranging from the colonial period to the present day. By bringing economic sociological concepts to bear on the CEJ and ToP frameworks, we advance debates on how firm-level dynamics shape environmental inequalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We do not capitalize the word “black” when it appears in lower case in the original quoted sources.
Ashwood, L. 2018. For-profit democracy. London: Yale University Press.
Ashwood, L., and K. MacTavish. 2016. Tyranny of the majority and rural environmental injustice. Journal of Rural Studies 47: 271–277.
Bell, S. 2016. Fighting king coal. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bell, S., and R. York. 2010. Community economic identity: The coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology 75 (1): 111–143.
Bell, S., J. Fitzgerald, and R. York. 2019. Protecting the power to pollute: Identity co-optation, gender, and the public relations strategies of fossil fuel industries in the United States. Environmental Sociology 5 (3): 323–338.
Brulle, R. 2019. Networks of opposition: A structural analysis of U.S. climate change countermovement coalitions 1989–2015. Sociological Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12333.
Buckingham, S., and R. Kulcur. 2010. Gendered geographies of environmental justice. In Spaces of environmental justice, ed. R. Holifield, M. Porter, and G. Walker, 70–94. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Burt, R. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 349–399.
Carrillo, I. 2020a. The racial fix and environmental state formation. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120913099.
Carrillo, I. 2020b. Racialized organizations and color-blind racial ideology in Brazil. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220943223.
Clark, B., D. Auerbach, and K. Zhang. 2018. The Du Bois nexus: Intersectionality, political economy, and environmental injustice in the Peruvian guano trade in the 1800s. Environmental Sociology 4 (1): 54–66.
Coase, R. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4 (16): 386–405.
Collins, P.H. 2000. Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568: 41–53.
Dockstader, S., and S. Bell. 2019. Ecomodern masculinity, energy security, and green consumerism: The rise of biofuels in the United States. Critical Sociology 46 (4–5): 643–660.
Downey, L. 2015. Inequality, democracy, and the environment. New York: NYU Press.
Ducre, K. 2018. The Black feminist spatial imagination and an intersectional environmental justice. Environmental Sociology 4 (1): 22–35.
Eisenberg, P. L. 1974. The sugar industry in Pernambuco 1840–1910: Modernization without change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fraginals, M.  2008. The sugarmill. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Freeland, R. 1996. The myth of the M-Form? Governance, consent, and organizational change. American Journal of Sociology 102 (2): 483–526.
Freeland, R. 2009. The social and legal bases of managerial authority. Entreprises et Histoire 57: 194–217.
Freitas, G. 2003. Ecos da violência. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumara.
Freudenburg, W. 2006. Environmental degradation, disproportionality, and the double diversion: Reaching out, reaching ahead, and reaching beyond. Rural Sociology 71 (1): 3–32.
Freyre, G.  1975. Casa-grande e senzala. Livraria José Olympo Editora.
Galeano, E. 1973. Open veins of Latin America. New York: Monthly Review.
Genovese, E.D. 1988. The political economy of slavery. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Gibbons, R. 1999. Taking coase seriously. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1): 145–157.
Gilmore, R.W. 2007. Golden gulag. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Golash-Boza, T. 2016. A critical and comprehensive sociological theory of race and racism. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 2 (2): 129–141.
Gould, K., A. Schnaiberg, and A. Weinberg. 1996. Local environmental struggles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
Granovetter, M. 1995. Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 4 (1): 93–130.
Granovetter, M. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 33–50.
Granovetter, M. 2017. Society and economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Granovetter, M., and R. Swedberg. 2011. The sociology of economic life. Boulder: Westview Press.
Grant, D., M.N. Trautner, L. Downey, and L. Thiebaud. 2010. Bringing the polluters back in: Environmental inequality and the organization of chemical production. American Sociological Review 75 (4): 479–504.
Haraway, D. 2015. Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities 6 (1): 159–165.
Harrison, J. 2019. From the inside out. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hirschman, D., and L. Garbes. 2019. Toward an economic sociology of race. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz054.
Hochshild, A. 2006. Bury the chains. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Holanda, S. 1936. Raízes do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Holifield, R., M. Porter, and G. Walker. 2010. Introduction: Spaces of environmental justice–frameworks for critical engagement. In Spaces of environmental justice, ed. R. Holifield, M. Porter, and G. Walker, 1–23. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Holleman, H. 2018. Dustbowls of empire. London: Yale University Press.
Hoover, E. 2018. Environmental reproductive justice: Intersections in an American Indian community impacted by environmental contamination. Environmental Sociology 4 (1): 8–21.
Hordge-Freeman, E. 2015. The color of love. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Hughey, M., D. Embrick, and A. Doane. 2015. Paving the way for future race research: Exploring the racial mechanisms within a color-blind, racialized social system. American Behavioral Scientist 59 (11): 1347–1357.
James, C.L.R.  1989. The Black Jacobins. New York: Vintage Books
Juarez-Dappe, P. 2010. When sugar ruled. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Junior, E. 2015. STF autoriza queimada de cana no nordeste. Globo. http://gazetaweb.globo.com/gazetadealagoas/noticia.php?c=262451. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Kurtz, H. 2009. Acknowledging the racial state: An agenda for environmental justice research. Antipode 41 (4): 684–704.
Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Macneil, I. 1978. Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review 72: 854–905.
Malin, S., and S. Ryder. 2018. Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environmental Sociology 4 (1): 1–7.
Marable, M. 1983. How capitalism underdeveloped Black America. Boston: South End Press.
March, J. and J. Olsen. 2011. The logic of appropriateness. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Robert E. Goodin (ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199604456-e-024. Accessed March 15, 2020.
McGillivray, G. 2009. Blazing cane. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mintz, S. 1986. Sweetness and power. New York: Penguin.
Mizruchi, M. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 271–298.
Monzote, R. 2008. From rainforest to cane field in Cuba. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.
Pereira, A. 1997. The end of the peasantry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Pellow, D. 2017. What is critical environmental justice? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Perrow, C., and S. Pulver. 2015. Organizations and markets. In Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives, ed. R. Dunlap and R. Brulle, 61–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, K. 2001. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Pulido, L. 2017. Geographies of race and ethnicity II: Environmental racism, racial capitalism and state-sanctioned violence. Progress in Human Geography 41 (4): 524–533.
Pulver, S. 2007. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: An environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment 20 (1): 44–83.
Ramos, P. 1999. Agroindústria canavieira e propriedade fundiária no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.
Ray, V. 2019. A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review 84 (1): 26–53.
Richardson, B. 1983. Caribbean migrants: Environment and human survival on St. Kitts and Nevis. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Robinson, C. 1983. Black Marxism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rodney, W. 1981. A history of the Guyanese working people, 1881–1905. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rogers, T. 2009. Laboring landscapes: The environmental, racial and class worldview of the Brazilian northeast’s sugar elite, 1880s–1930s. Luso-Brazilian Review 46 (2): 22–53.
Rogers, T. 2011. Race, respect, and authority in contemporary Brazil: Interpreting the stories of sugarcane workers. Labor 8 (2): 123–146.
Roscigno, V. 2007. The face of discrimination. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rudel, T., J.T. Roberts, and J.A. Carmin. 2011. Political economy of the environment. Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 221–238.
São, M. 2018. Grupo São Martinho. https://www.saomartinho.com.br/show.aspx?idMateria=cm80U4FEkag9mbBVLA4tIw. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Sapinski, J.P. 2019. Corporate climate policy-planning in the global polity: A network analysis. Critical Sociology 45 (4–5): 565–582.
Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The environment: From surplus to scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schnaiberg, A., and K. Gould. 1994. Environment and society: The enduring conflict. West Caldwell: Blackburn Press.
Schwarcz, L. 2019. Sobre o autoritarismo brasileiro. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Spiegel, M. 1997. The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. London: Mirror Books/IDEA.
Stainback, K., and D. Tomaskovic-Devey. 2012. Documenting desegregation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tomich, D. 2004. Through the prism of slavery. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35–67.
Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review 64 (4): 481–505.
Uzzi, B., and R. Lancaster. 2003. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science 49 (4): 383–399.
Walker, G. 2010. Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. In Spaces of environmental justice, ed. R. Holifield, M. Porter, and G. Walker, 24–46. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken.
Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. London: Collier-MacMillan.
Wingfield, A. 2020. Where work has been, where it is going: Considering race, gender, and class in the neoliberal economy. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 6 (2): 137–145.
Wingfield, A., and R. Alston. 2014. Maintaining hierarchies in predominantly white organizations: A theory of racial tasks. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (2): 274–287.
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. Any mistakes are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Carrillo, I., Pellow, D. Critical environmental justice and the nature of the firm. Agric Hum Values (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10193-2
- Critical environmental justice
- Treadmill of production
- Social embeddedness
- Managerial authority