Skip to main content

Ethics and responsibilisation in agri-food governance: the single-use plastics debate and strategies to introduce reusable coffee cups in UK retail chains

A Correction to this article was published on 02 April 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper extends arguments about the potential for reflexive governance in agri-food sustainability by linking food ethics to the notion of ‘unintended consequences’ and ‘responsibilisation’. Analysis of sustainable consumption governance shows the way authorities and intermediaries use food waste reduction projects to ‘responsibilise’ the consumer, including recent examples of shared responsibility. This paper takes this argument further by developing a ‘strategies of responsibilisation’ framework that connects relations between food system outcomes, problematisation in public discourse and strategies of responsibilisation in agri-food governance. A food and drink waste case study of strategies to introduce reusable coffee cups in UK coffee shops and food retail chains is examined to exemplify relations between problematisation and responsibilisation. We examine problematisation and responsibilisation discourses that have emerged in relation to the issue, particularly in relation to single-use plastics, together with emerging governance arrangements and their underlying rationalities. The case study shows two key things: firstly, how ethical questions about food in public discourses connect to wider environmental planetary concerns (in this case packaging in relation to the environment); and secondly, how responsibility has emergent and dynamic properties, which we term ‘cycles of responsibilisation’. The paper concludes by assessing the wider value of applying a responsibility framework to examine governance responses to increasingly complex agri-food system sustainability challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Google Trends, 06.02.2018

Fig. 3

Source: Google Trends, 06.02.2018

Change history

  • 02 April 2019

    The original version of this article has been corrected due to typesetting mistakes regarding Fig. 1.

Notes

  1. 1.

    GLAMUR—Global and local food chain assessment: a multidimensional performance-based approach. The project involved a systematic analysis of how the performance of food chains is perceived, defined and communicated in 12 countries (Brunori et al. 2016; Kirwan et al. 2017a, b).

Abbreviations

CSR:

Corporate Social Responsibility

EAC:

Environmental Audit Committee

PRS:

Producer Responsibility Scheme

WRAP:

Waste and Resources Action Programme

References

  1. Adkins, Lisa. 2003. Reflexivity: Freedom or Habit of Gender? Theory, Culture & Society 20 (6): 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett, Clive, Paul Cloke, Nick Clarke, and Alice Malpass. 2005. Consuming Ethics: Articulating the Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption. Antipode 37 (1): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00472.x. doi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, C., P. Cloke, N. Clarke, and A. Malpass. 2011. Globalizing Responsibility: The Political Rationalities of Ethical Consumption. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BBC News Online. 2016. Viewpoint: The waste mountain of coffee cups. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall. 27th July 2016. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news. Accessed 8 Feb 2018. 

  5. Block, F. 1990. Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunori, Gianluca, Francesca Galli, Dominique Barjolle, Rudolf van Broekhuizen, Luca Colombo, Mario Giampietro, and James Kirwan, et al. 2016. Are Local Food Chains More Sustainable than Global Food Chains? Considerations for Assessment. Sustainability 8 (5): 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casson, L. 2017. Plastic facts keep getting scarier. 20th July. Available from Greenpeace website: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/ Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  8. Chandler, David. 2013. Resilience ethics: responsibility and the globally embedded subject. Ethics & Global Politics 6 (3): 175–194. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v6i3.21695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Country Living. 2017. This week’s Blue Planet II has triggered an emotional public reaction. Weekly Newsletter. 19th November. http://www.countryliving.co.uk. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  10. DEFRA. 2018. A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment. London: DEFRA (Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dubbink, Wim, Johan Graafland, and Luc van Liedekerke. 2008. CSR, Transparency and the Role of Intermediate Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9893-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. EAC (Environmental Audit Committee). 2018. Disposable Packaging: Coffee Cups. Second Report of the Session 2017-19. HC 657. 5th January 2018. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, David, Daniel Welch, and Joanne Swaffield. 2017. Constructing and mobilizing ‘the consumer’: Responsibility, consumption and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (6): 1396–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x17694030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flood, A. 2018. ‘Single-use’ named 2018 word of the year. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/nov/2007/single-use-named-word-of-the-year-2018-environment-collins-dictionary. Accessed 18 Dec 2018.

  15. Gabbatiss, J. 2018. Disposable coffee cups: How big a problem are they for the environment? The Independent online: Environment: 5th January 2018. http://www.independent.co.uk/. Accessed 15 Feb 2018.

  16. Goodman, D., and E. M. DuPuis. 2002. Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production-consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 42 (1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman, M., D. Maye, and L. Holloway. 2010. Guest editorial. Ethical foodscapes?: premises, promises, and possibilities. Environment and Planning A 42: 1782–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman, D., E. M. DuPuis, and M. Goodman. 2012. Alternative Food Networks: knowledge, practice, and politics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Guthman, Julie. 2003. Fast food/organic food: reflexive tastes and the making of ‘yuppie chow’. Social & Cultural Geography 4 (1): 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hinrichs, C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinrichs, C. 2014. Transitions to sustainability: a change in thinking about food systems change? Agriculture & Human Values 31 (1): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9479-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, Peter, Neil Ward, and Polly Russell. 2009. Moral economies of food and geographies of responsibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34: 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirwan, James, and Damian Maye, and Gianluca Brunori. 2017a. Acknowledging complexity in food supply chains when assessing their performance and sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies 52: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirwan, James, and Damian Maye, and Gianluca Brunori. 2017b. Reflexive Governance, Incorporating Ethics and Changing Understandings of Food Chain Performance. Sociologia Ruralis 57 (3): 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12169. doi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laville, S. 2018. Explained: Throwaway Society. The Guardian Newspaper: Thursday 18th January, p. 11.

  27. Laville, S., and M. Taylor. 2018. British supermarkets create estimated 800,000 tonnes of plastic waste each year. The Guardian Newspaper: Thursday 18th January, pp. 10–11.

  28. Mason, P., and T. Lang. 2017. Sustainable Diets. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. McEwan, Cheryl, and Michael K. Goodman. 2010. Place Geography and the Ethics of Care: Introductory Remarks on the Geographies of Ethics, Responsibility and Care. Ethics, Place & Environment 13 (2): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668791003778602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller, Daniel. 2003. Could the Internet defetishise the commodity? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21: 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Monbiot, G. 2018. We won’t save the Earth with a better kind of disposable coffee cup. The Guardian Newspaper: Thursday 6th September. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/2006/save-earth-disposable-coffee-cup-green?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other. Accessed 18 Nov 2018.

  32. Nicholls, F. 2016. A rubbish truck of plastic in the ocean every minute—and how you can help. Greenpeace: Available from Greenpeace website: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/ Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  33. Pereira, Laura M., and Shaun Ruysenaar. 2012. Moving from traditional government to new adaptive governance: the changing face of food security responses in South Africa. Food Security 4 (1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0164-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Poortinga, W. 2017. Results of a field experiment to reduce coffee cup waste. Summary report to Bewley’s Tea & Coffee UK Ltd. Cardiff: Welsh School of Architecture & School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

  35. Popke, Jeff. 2006. Geography and ethics: everyday mediations through care and consumption. Progress in Human Geography 30 (4): 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph622pr.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Riley, Tess. 2018. MPs want you to pay a ‘latte levy’ to cut coffee cup waste. The Huffington Post, UK Edition: Politics: 5th January. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  37. River Cottage. 2018. The UK has woken up and smelled the coffee cup nightmare: https://rivercottage.net/. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  38. Sayer, Andrew. 2003. (De)commodification, consumer culture, and moral economy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21: 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sayer, Andrew. 2004. Moral economy. Lancaster: Lancaster University

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shove, Elizabeth. 2010. Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (6): 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Siegle, L. 2017. Milk bottles and copper hospitals: past ideas for a plastic-free future. The Guardian online. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.

  42. Springmann, Marco, Michael Clark, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Keith Wiebe, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Luis Lassaletta, Wim de Vries, et al. 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562 (7728): 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. WEF and EMF (World Economic Forum and Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2017. The new plastics economy: catalysing action. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  44. Westhoek, H., J. Ingram, S. Van Berkum, L. Özay, and M. Hajer. 2016. Food Systems and Natural Resources. A report prepared by the Working Group on Food Systems of the International Resource Panel: United Nations Environment Programme.

  45. Wollaston, S. 2016. Hugh’s War on Waste: The Battle Continues review 8 - taking the lid off the coffee cup scandal. The Guardian online. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.

  46. WRAP. 2008. The Food We Waste. Banbury: Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP).

    Google Scholar 

  47. WRAP. 2018. New initiative to transform UK plastics system and tackle plastic pollution. 11th January, 2018. http://wrap.org.uk/. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.

  48. Young, I. M. 2003. From guilt to solidarity: sweatshops and political responsibility. Dissent:39–44.

  49. Young, I. M. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based was funded by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme, as part of Theme [KBBE.2012.2.5-03] [A comparative analysis of global versus local food supply systems], Grant Agreement No.: 311778.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian Maye.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised due to typesetting Mistakes regarding Figure 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maye, D., Kirwan, J. & Brunori, G. Ethics and responsibilisation in agri-food governance: the single-use plastics debate and strategies to introduce reusable coffee cups in UK retail chains. Agric Hum Values 36, 301–312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09922-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethics and agri-food governance
  • Food and drink waste
  • Single-use packaging
  • Reusable coffee cups
  • Problematisation
  • Responsibilisation