Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 277–288 | Cite as

Systemic ethics and inclusive governance: two key prerequisites for sustainability transitions of agri-food systems

  • Sibylle BuiEmail author
  • Ionara Costa
  • Olivier De Schutter
  • Tom Dedeurwaerdere
  • Marek Hudon
  • Marlene Feyereisen
Symposium/Special Issue
  • 414 Downloads

Abstract

Food retailers are powerful actors of the agro-industrial food system. They exert strong lock-in effects that hinder transitions towards more sustainable agri-food systems. Indeed, their marketing practices generally result in excluding the most sustainable food products, such as local, low-input, small-scale farmers’ products. Recently in Belgium, several initiatives have been created to enable the introduction of local products on supermarket shelves. In this article, we study three of those initiatives to analyse if the development of local sourcing in supermarkets opens up an opportunity for a transition towards more sustainable agri-food systems. We conceptualise transitions as a shift in governance and ethical values and adopt a pragmatist approach of ethics combined with the systemic perspective of transition studies, to evaluate the impact of these initiatives. Our analysis shows that they mainly contribute to the reproduction of the incumbent agri-food system. It also highlights that first, to be a driver for sustainability transitions, food ethics need to be systemic i.e. relate to a systemic understanding of problems and perspective of sustainability, including social justice. And second, it highlights that governance arrangements involving not only representative organisations of the various agri-food and non-agricultural actors, but also actors upholding ethical values that are currently missing in conventional supply chains and representing excluded and marginalised interests, favour the uptake of such systemic ethics by incumbent actors. Hence, systemic ethics and inclusive governance are key features for initiatives to contribute to a sustainability transition.

Keywords

Sustainability transitions Governance Agri-food system Food ethics Local food Retail corporations 

Abbreviations

CSO

Civil society organisation

FTE

Full time equivalent

LAG

Local action group

UK

United Kingdom

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge co-funding of this research from the Belgian Science Policy Office, under the project FOOD4SUSTAINABILITY (contract BR/121/A5) and from the European Commission, under the project GENCOMMONS (ERC Grant Agreement 284). We also wish to thank the editors of this special issue for giving very useful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. vol. 10. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  2. Brunori, G. 2007. Local food and alternative food networks: A communication perspective. Anthropology of Food [Online].Google Scholar
  3. Brunori, G., and F. Galli. 2016. Sustainability of local and global food chains: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability 8: 765.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman. 1997. From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bui, S. 2015. Pour une approche territoriale des transitions écologiques. Analyse de la transition vers l’agroécologie dans la Biovallée. PhD dissertation. Paris: AgroParisTech.Google Scholar
  6. Bui, S. 2018. A whole system approach to agency in transitions: Evidence of a combined effect of multiple niches. Paper presented at the 9th International Sustainability Transition conference. Manchester, UK, 12–14 June 2018.Google Scholar
  7. Bui, S., A. Cardona, C. Lamin-e, and M. Cerf. 2016. Sustainability transitions: Insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in agri-food systems. Journal of Rural Studies 48: 92–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busch, L. 2003. Virgil, vigilance, and voice: Agrifood ethics in an age of globalization. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buttel, F. H. 1997. Some observations on agro-food change and the future of agricultural sustainability movements. In Globalising food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring, 344–365. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, M., R. Lhomme, and J. Fleury. 1999. Pour une sociologie de la traduction en innovation. Recherche & Formation 31: 113–126.  https://doi.org/10.3406/refor.1999.1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cardona, A. 2012. Territorial agri-food systems: relinking farming to local and environmental stakes to change farming systems. In Producing and reproducing farming systems. New modes of organisation for sustainable food systems of tomorrow. Proceedings of the 10th European IFSA Symposium.Google Scholar
  13. Clapp, J., and D. A. Fuchs. 2009. Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, I., S. Bui, O. De Schutter, and T. Dedeurwaerdere. 2018. Learning for sustainability transitions: a discussion on the role of mainstream business actors towards more sustainable food systems. Paper presented at the 9th International Sustainability Transition conference. Manchester, UK, 12–14 June 2018.Google Scholar
  15. Cowan, R., and P. Gunby. 1996. Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control Strategies. The Economic Journal 106: 521–542.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2235561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Schutter, O. 2009. Agribusiness and the right to food. New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
  17. Dedeurwaerdere, T., O. De Schutter, M. Hudon, E. Mathijs, B. Annaert, T. Avermaete, and T. Bleeckx, et al. 2017. The governance features of social enterprise and social network activities of collective food buying groups. Ecological Economics 140: 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedmann, H. 2005. From colonialism to green capitalism: Social movements and emergence of food regimes. Research in Rural Sociology and Development 11: 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29: 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedmann, H., and A. Mcnair. 2008. Whose rules rule? contested projects to certify ‘local production for distant consumers’. Journal of Agrarian Change 8: 408–434.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31: 1257–1274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geels, F. W. 2018. Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science 37: 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodman, D. 2003. The quality “turn” and alternative food practices: Reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman, D., and E. M. DuPuis. 2002. Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production–consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 42: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman, M. K., D. Maye, and L. Holloway. 2010. Ethical foodscapes? Premises, promises, and possibilities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42: 1782–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guthman, J. 2004. The trouble with ‘organic lite’in California: A rejoinder to the ‘conventionalisation’debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44: 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henson, S., and J. Humphrey. 2010. Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies 46: 1628–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinrichs, C. C. 2014. Transitions to sustainability: A change in thinking about food systems change? Agriculture and Human Values 31: 143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9479-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jänicke, M. 2008. Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Konefal, J., M. Mascarenhas, and M. Hatanaka. 2005. Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values 22: 291–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6046-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamine, C., H. Renting, A. Rossi, J. S. C. Wiskerke, and G. Brunori. 2012. Agri-food systems and territorial development: innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 229–256. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamine, C., J.-M. Audergon, S. Penvern, S. Simon, and J. Pluvinage. 2014a. From genetics to marketing (… and through complex connexions and interdependencies): an integrative approach of the ecologisation of fruit production. In Proceedings of the 2014 European IFSA SymposiumFarming systems facing global challenges: capacities and strategies. Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Lamine, C., M. Navarrete, and A. Cardona. 2014b. Transitions towards organic farming at the farm and at the local scales: the role of innovative production and organisational modes and networks. In Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures, 423–438. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamine, C., S. Bui, and G. Ollivier. 2015. Pour une approche systémique et pragmatique de la transition écologique des systèmes agri-alimentaires. Cahiers de recherche sociologique 58: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Velly, R., I. Dufeu, and L. Le Grel. 2016. Les systèmes alimentaires alternatifs peuvent-ils se développer commercialement sans perdre leur âme? Analyse de trois agencements marchands. Économie Rurale 6: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsden, T. K., A. Flynn, and M. Harrison. 2000. Consuming Interests: the Social Provision of Foods. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  37. McCullough, E. B., P. L. Pingali, and K. G. Stamoulis. 2010. Small farms and the transformation of food systems: An overview. In Looking East Looking West. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Pub.Google Scholar
  38. Oosterveer, P., J. S. Guivant, and G. Spaargaren. 2007. Shopping for green food in globalizing supermarkets: Sustainability at the consumption junction. In Sage Handbook on Environment and Society, 411–428. London: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Renting, H., T. K. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35: 393–411.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a3510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richards, C., H. Bjørkhaug, G. Lawrence, and E. Hickman. 2013. Retailer-driven agricultural restructuring—Australia, the UK and Norway in comparison. Agriculture and Human Values 30: 235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9408-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human values. New-York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Saccomandi, V. 1998. Agricultural market economics: a neo-institutional analysis of the exchange, circulation and distribution of agricultural products. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2010. The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society 15: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sonnino, R., and T. K. Marsden. 2006. Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 181–199.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spaargaren, G., and A. P. J. Mol. 1992. Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources 5: 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Ploeg, J. D., R. van Broekhuizen, G. Brunori, R. Sonnino, K. Knickel, T. Tisenkopfs, and H. Oostindie. 2008. Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development. In Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development, European Perspectives on Rural Development, 1–28. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  47. Vanloqueren, G., and P. V. Baret. 2008. Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study. Ecological Economics 66: 436–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiskerke, J. S. C. 2009. On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies 14: 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wittmayer, J. M., F. Avelino, F. van Steenbergen, and D. Loorbach. 2017. Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wrigley, N. 1994. Retailing and the arbitrage economy: market structure, regulatory frameworks, investment regimes, and spatial outcomes. Paper presented at the Harold Innes Centenary Conference. Toronto, Canada, 23–25 September 1994.Google Scholar
  51. Zwart, H. 2000. A short history of food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Philosophy of LawUniversity of LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.Solvay Brussels School of Economics and ManagementUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Département Sciences et Gestion Environnement, SEEDUniversity of LiègeArlonBelgium

Personalised recommendations