This paper focuses on the centrality of permaculture design courses (PDCs) as the principal sociopolitical strategy of the permaculture community in Canada to transform local food production practices. Building on the work of Antonio Gramsci and political agroecology as a framework of analysis, we argue that permaculture instruction remains deeply embedded within market and colonial relations, which orients the pedagogy of permaculture trainings in such a way as to reproduce the basic elements of the colonial capitalist economy among its practitioners. In the specific case of eastern Ontario, this embeddedness had the effect of diluting the transformative capacity of permaculture practitioners who were unable to create its own social movement organization. The paper then highlights key elements of the agroecological pedagogy used by the Brazilian Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) and the Escola Latinoamericana de Agroecología (Latin American School of Agroecology, or ELAA) in Paraná, Brazil. The objective is to draw lessons from these inspiring experiences, in a rather unique context of struggles that can help to critically assess the pedagogical practices and principles presently informing permaculture communities in Canada and in advanced industrialized countries more generally. We then conclude by reiterating the key arguments and lessons drawn from the Brazilian pedagogical experiences, pointing out the importance of engagement and coalition-building with established rural and urban movements, as well as progressive farmer, Indigenous, and rural associations to foster a just and sustainable transformation of agri-food systems, starting at the local and regional levels. It also emphasizes the need for the most marginalized sectors to lead the way towards an agroecological transition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Gender and racial issues are particularly relevant to analyze both in the Canadian and Brazilian contexts, but for the purpose of this paper we mostly focus on the effects of a permaculture pedagogy that is embedded in a neoliberal capitalist and colonial context, from a Gramscian perspective. Nonetheless, we recognize that an intersectional approach would be extremely useful to make visible gender and racial inequalities that persist among agroecology and permaculture communities.
Eastern Ontario is not a formal political designation. For our purpose, and as it is used in this particular region, it covers the area in Ontario east of Toronto and south of Deep River.
In Gramsci’s work, hegemony involves both consent and coercion; to maintain their power, the rulers, or dominant forces, need to build alliances with other classes and convince a majority that the prevailing order is also beneficial for them, thus obtaining their consent. However, hegemony is never complete. The constant presence of resistance forces requires the availability of coercive means to dissuade lower classes, the “ruled”, to rebel and form a counter-hegemonic movement.
PRI’s Global Permaculture site allows local permaculture institutions, teachers, and students to create their own profile, which the PRI then verifies to ensure that teachers and students did in fact complete a recognized PDC.
MST website, accessed December 10, 2017: http://www.mstbrazil.org/content/history-mst.
Paulo Freire and his well-known book the Pedagogy of the oppressed, was a popular educator who greatly inspired the MST pedagogy and liberation theology. Considering our main focus here on Gramscian insights, we decided not to include a discussion of Freire’s important influence on the MST, but see for example Barbosa (2017).
Comissão Pastoral da Terra (Pastoral Land Commission)
Community Urban Food Forest
Escola Latinoamericana de Agroecología (Latin American School of Agroecology)
Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (Landless Rural Workers Movement)
National Capital Commission
Ontario Public Interest Research Group
Permaculture Design Course
Permaculture Institute of Eastern Ontario
Permaculture Research Institute
Aiken, G. T. 2017. Permaculture and the social design of nature. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 99 (2): 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2017.1315906.
Akram-Lodhi, H. 2013. Hungry for change: Farmers, food justice and the agrarian question. Winnipeg: Fernwood.
Altieri, M. A. 1995. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.
Altieri, M. A., and I. C. Nicholls. 2017. Agroecology: A brief account of its origins and currents of thought in Latin America. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41 (3–4): 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1287147.
Altieri, M., and V. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38: 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.
Bang, J. M. 2005. Ecovillages: A practical guide to sustainable communities. New Society Publishers.
Barbosa, L. P. 2017. Educação do campo [education for and by the countryside] as a political project in the context of the struggle for land in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (1): 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1119120.
Bernardes, J. 2016. Culture is the best way to build working class unity. Friends of the MST website, 21 June, access online, April 20th, 2017: http://www.mstbrazil.org/news/culture-best-way-build-working-class-unity.
Bookchin, M. 1962. Our synthetic environment. New York: Knopf. (Published using pseudonym Lewis Herber).
Branford, S., and J. Rocha. 2002. Cutting the wire: The story of the landless movement in Brazil. London: Latin America Bureau.
Brawner, J. 2015. Permaculture in the margins: Realizing Central European regeneration. Journal of Political Ecology 22: 429–444. https://doi.org/10.2458/v22i1.21117.
Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Conford, P. 2011. The organic alternative: Farming. In The development of the organic network: linking people and themes, 1945-95, 71–135. Edinburgh: Floris Books.
Dawson, J. 2006. Ecovillages: New frontiers for sustainability, Schumacher Briefing. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Ferguson, R. S., and S. T. Lovell. 2014. Permaculture for agroecology: Design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34 (2): 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6.
Ferguson, R. S., and S. T. Lovell. 2015. Grassroots engagement with transition to sustainability: Diversity and modes of participation in the international permaculture movement. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08048-200439.
Ferguson, R. S., and S. T. Lovell. 2017a. Diversification and labor productivity on US permaculture farms. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000497.
Ferguson, R. S., and S. T. Lovell. 2017b. Livelihoods and production diversity on US permaculture farms. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41 (6): 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1320349.
Fukuoka, M. 1990. The one-straw revolution: An introduction to natural farming. (Trans. L. Korn) New York: NYRB Classics.
Gliessman, S. 2013. Agroecology: Growing the roots of resistance. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.736927.
Gordon, U. 2008. Luddites, hackers and gardeners: Anarchism and the politics of technology. In Anarchy Alive! Anti-authoritarian politics from practice to theory, 109–138. London: Pluto Press.
Gramsci, A., and Q. Hoare. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
Hadich, C., and J. M. Tardín. 2009. Escola Latino Americana de Agroecología: Experiências camponesas de agroecología. Paraná.
Holmgren, D. 2002. Permaculture: Principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Hepburn: Holmgren Design Services.
Holmgren, D. 2011. The long view. In Permaculture pioneers: Stories from the new frontier, eds. K. Dawborn, and C. Smith, 18–29. Australia: Melliodora Publishing.
Hopkins, R. 2008. The transition handbook: From oil dependency to local resilience. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Jacob, J. 1997. New pioneers: The back-to-the-land movement and the search for a sustainable future. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.
Jungck, J. R. 1985. Perennial polyculture, permaculture and preservation: The principle of diversity. The American Biology Teacher 47 (2): 72–75.
Karriem, A. 2013. Space, ecology, and politics in the praxis of the Brazilian landless movement. In Gramsci: Space, nature, politics, ed. Michael Ekers, Gillian Hart, Stephen Kipfer and Alex Loftus, 142–160. Oxford: Wiley.
Kelly-Bisson, C. 2013. Forests for the people: Resisting neoliberalism through permaculture design. Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Carleton University.
Kennedy, D. 1991. Permaculture and the sustainable city. Ekistics 58 (348/349): 210–215.
Kepkiewicz, L., and B. Dale. 2018. Keeping ‘our’ land: Property, agriculture and tensions between Indigenous and settler visions of food sovereignty in Canada. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1439929.
Lawton, G. 2011. Thinking big. In Permaculture pioneers: Stories from the new frontier, ed. K. Dawborn, and C. Smith, 87–109.
Levidow, L., M. Pimbert, and G. Vanloqueren. 2014. Agroecological research: Conforming—or transforming the dominant agro-food regime? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38: 1127–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.951459.
Mann, S. 2012. September 27. Episode 1223: The cost of a permaculture design course (Permabyte). The Permaculture Podcast. Retrieved from http://www.thepermaculturepodcast.com/2012/pdc-cost/.
Massicotte, M. J. 2014. Beyond political economy: Political ecology and La Vía Campesina’s struggle for food sovereignty through the experience of the Escola Latinoamericana de Agroecologia (ELAA), Brazil. In Globalization and food sovereignty, eds. P. Andrée, J. Ayres, M. Bosia, and M.-J. Massicotte, 255–287. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820354.
McWilliams, C. 1939. Factories in the field: The story of migratory labor in the United States. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Meek, D. 2015. Learning as territoriality: The political ecology of education in the Brazilian landless workers’ movement. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42: 1179–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.978299.
Meek, D., and R. Tarlau. 2016. Critical food systems education (CFSE): Educating for food sovereignty. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40: 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1130764.
Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, and R. Cohen. 2013. Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.736926.
Mollison, B. 1988. Permaculture: A designers manual. 2nd ed. Tyalgum: Tagari.
Mollison, B., and D. Holmgren. 1978. Permaculture one: A perennial agriculture for human settlements. Tyalgum: Tagari.
Morel K., C. Guégan, and F. Léger. 2016. Can an organic market garden based on holistic thinking be viable without motorization? The case of a permaculture farm. Acta Horticulturae. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1137.47.
Morton, A. D. 2007. Global capitalism and the peasantry in Mexico: The recomposition of class struggle. The Journal of Peasant Studies 34 (3–4): 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150701806257.
Motta, S. C. 2017. Emancipation in Latin America: On the pedagogical turn. Bulletin of Latin American Research 36: 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12526.
Movement Generation. 2013. Mission. http://www.movementgeneration.org/about-us/mission-and-history. Accessed 13 April 2013
Odum, H. T. 1971. Environment, power, and society. 1st ed. New York: Wiley.
Ontario Public Interest Research Group (OPIRG). 2012. Working Groups. Retrieved from http://www.opirgcarleton.org/.
Pahnke, A. 2015. Education of the countryside at a crossroads: Rural social movements and national policy reform in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.990444.
Permaculture Global. 2017. Worldwide permaculture projects. https://permacultureglobal.org/. Accessed 23 Mar 2017.
Permaculture Institute of Eastern Ontario. 2012. Home Page. http://eonpermaculture.ca. Accessed 13 Dec 2012
Permaculture Ottawa. 2012. Permaculture Ottawa Facebook Group. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/groups/PermacultureInOttawa/.
Pimbert, M. 2008. Towards food sovereignty: reclaiming autonomous food systems. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2010. Ethical doings in nature cultures. Ethics, Place & Environment 13 (2): 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668791003778834.
Smith, J. S. 1950. Tree crops: A permanent agriculture. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Smith, C. 2011. Introduction, ix-xx. In Permaculture pioneers: Stories from the new frontier, ed. K. Dawborn, and C. Smith, Tylagum: Melliodora Publishing.
Stedile, J. P., and B. F. Mançano. 1999. Brava gente: A trajetória do MST e a luta pela terra no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Taylor, M. 2015. The political ecology of climate change adaptation: Livelihoods, agrarian change and the conflicts of development. New York: Routledge.
Toledo, V. M., and N. Barrera-Bassols. 2017. Political agroecology in Mexico: A path toward sustainability. Sustainability 9 (2): 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020268.
Van der Ploeg, J. D. 2009. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.
Vergara-Camus, L. 2014. Land and freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and peasant alternatives to neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.
Veteto, J. R., and L. Joshua. 2008. Environmental anthropology engaging permaculture: Moving theory and practice toward sustainability. Culture & Agriculture 30 (1–2): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-486X.2008.00007.x.
Wright, S. 2014. Food sovereignty in practice: A study of farmer-led agriculture in the Philippines. In Globalization and food sovereignty: Global and local change in the new politics of food, ed. Peter Andrée et al., 199–227. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Our gratitude goes out to all interviewees and activists, especially those from the Ottawa permaculture community, the ELAA and the Brazilian MST for sharing their knowledge and expertise informing this research. Your love for your community and dream for a sustainable world is inspiring. Thanks to Patricia Ballamingie and Jill Wigle for supervising the eastern Ontario fieldwork that went into the writing of this paper, and to reviewers for providing insightful feedback to improve this article. A special thanks to Tiaraju P. D’Andrea for research assistantship, as well as Stephen Brown, Peter Andrée, Alicia Martin, and Michael J. Wigginton for offering their feedback and editing. This paper was produced with the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, and The Douglas Fullerton Award in Urban Studies.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
About this article
Cite this article
Massicotte, MJ., Kelly-Bisson, C. What’s wrong with permaculture design courses? Brazilian lessons for agroecological movement-building in Canada. Agric Hum Values 36, 581–594 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9870-8
- Emancipatory pedagogy
- Peasant movements