Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 455–474 | Cite as

Gendered agrobiodiversity management and adaptation to climate change: differentiated strategies in two marginal rural areas of India

  • Federica RaveraEmail author
  • Victoria Reyes-García
  • Unai Pascual
  • Adam G. Drucker
  • David Tarrasón
  • Mauricio R. Bellon


Social and cultural contexts influence power dynamics and shape gender perceptions, roles, and decisions regarding the management of agrobiodiversity for dealing with and adapting to climate change. Based on a feminist political ecology framework and a mixed method approach, this research performs an empirical analysis of two case studies in the northern of India, one in the Himalayan Mountains and another in the Indian-Gangetic plains. It explores context-specific (i) influence of gender roles and responsibilities on on-farm agrobiodiversity management (ii) gendered expertise and knowledge related to agrobiodiversity and (iii) gendered preferences for practices and institutional arrangements for agrobiodiversity conservation linked to adaptation to climate change. In the Himalayan mountains women actively participate in crop and seed management decisions and tasks, and maintain informal institutions for seed and services exchanges in the case of crisis, which simultaneously favours high levels of agrobiodiversity and enhances women’s social status. By contrast, in the Indio-Gangetic plains, where women from better-off households are socially secluded and women from poorer households work mainly as labourer to respond to high out-migration of men, they exercise less public control over agrobiodiversity, with their role being mainly invisible at the homestead and related to post-production tasks. We finally discuss as improved understanding of the links between gendered spaces, crops, tasks, social status, and agrobiodiversity management can facilitate the design of gender-sensitive policy interventions for conservation and adaptation to climate change.


Adaptation Climate change Feminist political ecology Gender India On-farm agrobiodiversity 



Climate change, agriculture and food security research program


Consultative group on international agricultural research


Focus group discussion


Indian council of agricultural research


National bureau of plant genetic resources


Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan



This work was carried out in collaboration with Bioversity International and the Basque Centre for Climate Change. We would like to thank Dr. Prem Mathur and the entire staff of Bioversity International, India for their logistical support and assistance with data collection. We would like to acknowledge the farmers from villages in Uttarakhand and Bihar who participated in the research, as well as expressing our gratitude to Dr. Sahai and colleagues from Gene Campaign, Dr. Solanki and the staff of Rajendra Agricultural University at Pusa Campus in Bihar staff at VPKAS, Almora and staff at the NBPGR Regional Station in Bowali, Uttarakhand for their support in undertaking the field work. I would especially like to thank Ms. Puja Bisht, Ms. Kamini Kumari, Ms. Marya Zabeen and Mr. Avinash Kumar for their dedication during survey interviews and focus group discussions. Funding for this research was provided by the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organizations. The first author received funds by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (Spain) (IJCI-2015-25586) and AXA Research Fund (2017–2019).


  1. Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry and gender: An analysis and conceptual framework. World Development 29 (10): 1623–1648.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. 2002. Bargaining, gender equality and legal change: The case of india’s inheritance laws. Discussion Paper No. 165. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B. 2010. Does women’s proportional strength affect their participation? Governing local forests in South Asia. World Development 38 (1): 98–112.Google Scholar
  4. Aggarwal, P. K., S. K. Bandyopadhyay, H. Pathak, N. Kalra, S. Chander, and S. Kumar. 2000. Analysis of yield trends of the rice–wheat system in north-western India. Outlook on Agriculture 29: 259–268.Google Scholar
  5. Aguilar, L. 2009. Climate connections women and climate change: Vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities. In State of the world 2009: Into a warming world. Washington, D.C: The Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Arora-Jonsson, S. 2011. Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 744–751.Google Scholar
  7. Arora-Jonsson, S. 2014. Forty years of gender research and environmental policy: Where do we stand? Women’s Studies International Forum 47: 295–308.Google Scholar
  8. Auffhammer, M., V. Ramanathan, and J. R. Vincent. 2012. Climate change, the monsoon, and rice yield in India. Climatic Change 111 (2): 411–424. Scholar
  9. Badola, R., and S. A. Hussain. 2003. Conflict in paradise: Women and protected areas in the Indian Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 23 (3): 234–237.Google Scholar
  10. Bee, B. 2013. Who Reaps what is Sown? A feminist inquiry into climate change adaptation in two Mexican Ejidos. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 12 (1): 131–154.Google Scholar
  11. Bellon, M. R. 2004. Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Development 32 (1): 159–172.Google Scholar
  12. Bellon, M. R., and J. van Etten. 2014. Climate change and on-farm conservation of crop landraces in centres of diversity. In Plant genetic resources and climate change, eds. M. Jackson, B. Ford-Lloyd, and M. Parry, pp 137–150. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  13. Bellon, M. R., J. L. Pham, and M. T. Jackson. 1997. Genetic conservation: A role for rice farmers. In Plant conservation: The in situ approach, eds. N. Maxted, B. V. Ford-Lloyd, and J. G. Hawkes, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10 (5): 1251–1262.Google Scholar
  15. Bhattarai, B., R. Beilin, and R. Ford. 2015. Gender, agrobiodiversity, and climate change: A study of adaptation practices in the Nepal Himalayas. World Development 70: 122–132.Google Scholar
  16. Brody, A., J. Demetriades, and E. Esplen. 2008. Gender and climate change: Mapping the linkages. A scoping study on knowledge and gaps. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development studies (IDS).Google Scholar
  17. Buechler, S. 2015. Climate-water challenges and adaptation strategies of women in a Riparian Community in Sonora, Mexico. In A political ecology of women, water and global environmental change, eds. Stephanie Buechler, and Anne-Marie Hanson, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Buechler, S. 2016. Gendered vulnerabilities and grassroots adaptation initiatives in homegardens and small orchards in Northwest Mexico. Ambio 45 (3): 322–334.Google Scholar
  19. Buechler, S., and A. M. Hanson, eds. 2015. A political ecology of women, water and global environmental change. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  20. Carey, M., M. Jackson, A. Antonello, and J. Rushing. 2016. Glaciers, gender, and science. A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research. Progress in Human Geography 40 (6): 770–793.Google Scholar
  21. Carr, E. R. 2008. Men’s crops and women’s crops: The importance of gender to the understanding of agricultural and development outcomes in Ghana’s Central Region. World Development 36: 900–915.Google Scholar
  22. Carr, E. R., and M. C. Thompson-Hall. 2014. Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings: Current thinking, new directions, and research frontiers. Geography Compass 8/3: 182–197.Google Scholar
  23. Chant, S. 2010. Gendered poverty across space and time: Introduction and overview. In The international handbook of gender and poverty: Concepts, research, policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Colls, A., N. Ash, and N. Ninni Ikkala. 2009. Ecosystem-based adaptation: A natural response to climate change. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  25. Crane, T. A. 2010. Of models and meanings: Cultural resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 15: 19.Google Scholar
  26. Dankelman, I., ed. 2010. Gender and climate change: An introduction. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  27. Deb, D. 2009. Biodiversity and complexity of rice farm ecosystems: An empirical assessment. The Open Ecology Journal 2: 112–129.Google Scholar
  28. Díaz-Reviriego, I., Á. Fernández-Llamazares, M. Salpeteur, P. L. Howard, and V. Reyes-García. 2016. Gendered medicinal plant knowledge contributions to adaptive capacity and health sovereignty in Amazonia. Ambio 45: 263–275.Google Scholar
  29. Djoudi, H., and M. Brockhaus. 2011. Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. International Forestry Review 13 (2): 123–135.Google Scholar
  30. Djoudi, H., B. Locatelli, C. Vaast, K. Asher, M. Brockhaus, and B. Sijapati Basnett. 2016. Beyond dichotomies: Gender and intersecting inequalities in climate change studies. Ambio 45 (3): 248–262.Google Scholar
  31. Food Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Roles of women in agriculture. Prepared by the SOFA team and Cheryl Doss. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  32. Garikipati, S. 2009. Landless but not Assetless: Female agricultural labour on the road to better status, evidence from India. Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 517–545.Google Scholar
  33. Giri, K., and I. Darnhofer. 2010. Out migrating men: A window of opportunity for women’s participation in community forestry? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 25 (9): 55–61.Google Scholar
  34. Howard, P. L. 2003. Women and the plant world: An exploration. In Women and plants: Gender relations in biodiversity management and conservation, ed. P. Howard, London: Zed Press and Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Howard, P. L. 2006. Gender Bias in Ethnobotany: Propositions and evidence of a distorted science and promises of a brighter future. Distinguished Economic Botanist Lecture. New Royal Botanical Gardens.Google Scholar
  36. Howard, P. L., and G. N. Nabanoga. 2007. Are There Customary Rights to Plants? An Inquiry among the Baganda (Uganda) with special attention to Gender. World Development 35: 1542–1563.Google Scholar
  37. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). 2007. State of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in India (1996–2006): A Country Report. New Delhi: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, ICAR.Google Scholar
  38. Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, and L. A. Meyer (eds.). Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  39. Jewitt, S. 2000. Unequal knowledges in Jharkhand, India: Deromanticizing women’s agroecological expertise. Development and Change 31: 961–985.Google Scholar
  40. Johns, T., and B. R. Shapits. 2004. Biocultural diversity in the sustainability of developing countries food systems. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 25: 143–154.Google Scholar
  41. Joshi, D. 2014. Feminist Solidarity? Women’s Engagement in Politics and the Implications for Water Management in the Darjeeling Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 34 (3): 243–254.Google Scholar
  42. Lambrou, Y., and G. Piana. 2005. Gender: the missing component in the response to climate change. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  43. Leach, M. 1992. Women’s crops in women’s spaces. Gender relations in Mende rice farming. In Bush base: Forest farm culture, environment and development, eds. E. Croll, and D. Parkin., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Love, B., and D. Spaner. 2007. Agrobiodiversity: Its value, measurement, and conservation in the context of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 31 (2): 53–65.Google Scholar
  45. MacGregor, S. 2010. Gender and climate change: From impacts to discourses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 6: 223–238. Scholar
  46. Maharjan, A., S. Bauer, and B. Knerr. 2012. Do rural women who stay behind benefits from male out-migration. Case study in the hills of Nepal. Gender Technology and Development 16: 9–123.Google Scholar
  47. Mahmud, S., N. M. Shah, and S. Becker. 2012. Measurement of women’s empowerment in rural Bangladesh. World Development 40 (3): 610–619.Google Scholar
  48. Mehta, M. 1996. “Our lives are no different from that of our buffaloes”: Agricultural change and gendered spaces in a central Himalayan valley. In Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences, eds. D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari, 180–208. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Mehta, M. 2008. Gender Assessment of Uttarakhand Livelihoods Improvements Project in the Himalayas. ICIMOD.Google Scholar
  50. Mehta, P. S., K. S. Negi, and S. N. Ohja. 2010. Native plant genetic resources and traditional foods of Uttarakhand Himalaya for sustainable food security and livelihoods. Indian Journal of natural products and resources 1 (1): 89–96.Google Scholar
  51. Meinzen-Dick, R., C. Kovarik, and A. R. Quisumbing. 2014. Gender and sustainability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39: 29–55.Google Scholar
  52. Molden, D., R. Verma, and E. Sharma. 2014. Gender equality as a key strategy for achieving equitable and sustainable development in mountains: The case of the Hindu Kush–Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development 34 (3): 297–300.Google Scholar
  53. Momsen, J. H. 2007. Gender and Agrobiodiversity. Introduction to the special issue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  54. Nautiyal, A. 2003. Women and Development in the Garhwal Himalayas. AJWS 9(4): 93–113.Google Scholar
  55. Nautiyal, S., V. Bisht, K. S. Rao, and R. K. Maikhuri. 2008. The role of cultural values in agrobiodiversity conservation: A case study from Uttarakhand, Himalaya. Journal Human Ecology 23 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  56. Nellemann, C., R. Verma, and L. Hislop, eds. 2011. Women at the frontline of climate change: Gender risks and hopes. Arendal: UNEP Grid Arendal.Google Scholar
  57. Nelson, V., and T. Stathers. 2009. Resilience, power, culture, and climate: A case study from semi-arid Tanzania, and new research directions. Gender and Development 17 (1): 81–94.Google Scholar
  58. Nielsen, J. Ø., and A. Reenberg. 2010. Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: A case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Global Environmental Change 20 (1): 142–152.Google Scholar
  59. Nightingale, A. 2003. A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2 (1): 77–90.Google Scholar
  60. Oakley, E., and J. H. Momsen. 2007. Women and seed management: A study of two villages in Bangladesh. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28: 90–106.Google Scholar
  61. Ogra, M. V. 2008. Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum 39 (3): 1408–1422.Google Scholar
  62. Onta, N., and B. P. Resurreccion. 2011. The role of gender and caste in climate adaptation strategies in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 31 (4): 351–356.Google Scholar
  63. Padmanabhan, M. 2007. The making and unmaking of gendered crops in northern Ghana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28 (1): 57–70.Google Scholar
  64. Padmanabhan, M. 2011. Women and men as conservers, users and managers of agrobiodiversity. Journal of Socio-Economics 40 (6): 968–976.Google Scholar
  65. Paris, T., A. Singh, J. Luis, and M. Hossain. 2005. Labour outmigration, livelihood of rice farming households and women left behind: A case study in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly 40: 2522–2529.Google Scholar
  66. Pathak, H., J. K. Ladha, P. K. Aggarwal, S. Peng, S. Das, Y. Singh, B. Singh, S. K. Kamra, B. Mishra, A. Sastri, H. P. Aggarwal, D. K. Das, and R. K. Gupta. 2003. Trends of climatic potential and on-farm yields of rice and wheat in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 80: 223–234.Google Scholar
  67. Pinetti, C. 2006. Seed diversity in the drylands: Women and farming in South India. Gatekeeper series 126. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
  68. Pokhriyal, H. C. 1994. Human environment and socio-economic development in the Himalayas: An institutional study of natural and human resource management in the Garhwal and Kumaon Himalayas. New Delhi: B.R. Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Ramdas, S. R., and Yakshi, and G. Deepika 2001. Changing livelihoods, livestock, and local knowledge systems: Women stake their claim in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 8 (2): 152–174.Google Scholar
  70. Ravera, F., I. Iniesta-Arandia, B. Martín-López, U. Pascual, and P. Bose. 2016a. Gender perspectives in resilience, vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change. Ambio 45 (3): 235–247.Google Scholar
  71. Ravera, F., B. Martín-López, U. Pascual, and A. Drucker. 2016b. The diversity of gendered adaptation strategies to climate change of Indian farmers: A bottom-up feminist intersectional approach. Ambio 45 (3): 335–351.Google Scholar
  72. Resurrección, B. P. 2013. Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Studies International Forum 40: 33–43.Google Scholar
  73. Reyes-García, V., S. Vila, L. Aceituno-Mata, L. Calvet-Mir, T. Garnatje, A. Jesch, J. J. Lastra, M. Parada, M. Rigat, J. Vallès, and M. Pardo-de-Santayana. 2010. Gendered homegardens: A study in three mountain areas of the Iberian Peninsula. Economic Botany 64 (3): 235–247.Google Scholar
  74. Rocheleau, D. 1995. Maps, number, text and context: Mixing methods in feminist political ecology. Professional Geographer 47 (4): 458–466.Google Scholar
  75. Rocheleau, D., and R. Roth. 2007. Rooted networks, relational webs and powers of connection: Rethinking human and political ecologies. Geoforum 38: 433–437.Google Scholar
  76. Sahai, S. 2000. Farmers’ rights and food security. Economic and Political Weekly 11: 878–880.Google Scholar
  77. Schöley, M., and M. Padmanabhan. 2017. Formal and informal relations to rice seed systems in Kerala, India: Agrobiodiversity as a gendered social-ecological artifact. Agriculture and Human Values 34: 969–982.Google Scholar
  78. Sunderland, T., R. Achdiawan, A. Angelsen, R. Babigumira, A. Ickowitz, F. Paumgarten, V. Reyes-García, and G. Shively. 2014. Challenging perceptions about men, women and forest product use: A global comparative study. World Development 64 (81): S56–S66.Google Scholar
  79. Thompson-Hall, M., E. Carr, and U. Pascual. 2016. Enhancing and expanding intersectional research for climate change adaptation in Agrarian settings. Ambio 45 (3): 373–382.Google Scholar
  80. Tschakert, P. 2012. From impacts to embodied experiences: Tracing political ecology in climate change research. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 112: 37–41.Google Scholar
  81. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2012. Gender and climate change Asia and Pacific. Gender and adaptation. UNDP policy brief 2.Google Scholar
  82. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2011. Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation: Compilation of information. Report FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2.Google Scholar
  83. Vermeulen, S., J. Pramod, K. Aggarwal, A. Ainslie, C. Angelone, B. M. Campbell, A. J. Challinor, J. W. Hansen, J. Ingram, A. Jarvis, P. Kristjanson, Charlotte Lau, G. Nelson, P. K. Thornton, and E. K. Wollenberg. 2011. Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change. Environmental Science and Policy 14: 136–144.Google Scholar
  84. Vignola, R., B. Locatelli, C. Martínez, and P. Imbach. 2009. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: What role for policy-makers, society and scientists? Mitigation and Adaptation of Strategies for Global Change 14: 691–696.Google Scholar
  85. Wilson, M. 2003. Exchange, patriarchy and status: Women’s homegardens in Bangladesh. In Women and plants: Gender relations in biodiversity management and conservation, ed. Howard P., London: Zed Press and Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Yapa, L. 1996. Improved seeds and constructed scarcity. In Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements, eds. R. Peet, and M. Watts, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Zimmerer, K. S. 2014. Conserving agrobiodiversity amid global change, migration, and nontraditional livelihood networks: The dynamic uses of cultural landscape knowledge. Ecology and Society 19 (2): 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federica Ravera
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Victoria Reyes-García
    • 4
    • 5
  • Unai Pascual
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Adam G. Drucker
    • 9
  • David Tarrasón
    • 3
  • Mauricio R. Bellon
    • 9
  1. 1.Chair in Agroecology and Food SystemsUniversitat de Vic – Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC)VicSpain
  2. 2.FRACTAL CollectiveMadridSpain
  3. 3.CREAFCerdanyola del VallèsSpain
  4. 4.Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia AmbientalsUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellatera, BarcelonaSpain
  6. 6.Basque Centre for Climate ChangeLeioaSpain
  7. 7.Kerbasque, Basque Foundation for ScienceBilbaoSpain
  8. 8.Centre for Development and Environment University of BernBernSwitzerland
  9. 9.Bioversity InternationalMaccareseItaly

Personalised recommendations