Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 515–527 | Cite as

Traditional beneficiaries: trade bans, exemptions, and morality embodied in diets

Article
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

Research on the nutrition transition often treats dietary changes as an outcome of increased trade and urban living. The Northern Food Crisis presents a puzzle since it involves hunger and changing diets, but coincides with a European ban on trade in seal products. I look to insights from economic sociology and decolonizing scholarship to make sense of the ban on seal products and its impacts. I examine how trade arrangements enact power imbalances in ways that are not always obvious. I explain how the ban’s exemption for Inuit-produced seal goods explicitly aims to protect Inuit from the harshness of capitalism and preserve their traditions. In this respect, the Northern Food Crisis is an embodiment of European visions of who Inuit are expected to be and how they are supposed to act in the global economy.

Keywords

Food Trade Nutrition transition Economic sociology Seal 

Abbreviations

EU

European Union

MEPs

Members of European Parliament

WTO

World Trade Organization

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to James Braun, Dr. Josée Johnston, Dr. Mustafa Koç, Dr. Harvey James and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. I am also grateful to supportive audiences at the 2015 CAFS annual conference, the 2015 AFHVS/ASFS annual conference, and the Animals and Society section at the 2016 ASA conference.

References

  1. Anderson, K. 2000. A recognition of being: Reconstructing native womanhood. Toronto, ON: Sumach Press.Google Scholar
  2. APTN (Aboriginal Peoples Television Network). 2013. Ban on seal products upsets Inuit. http://aptn.ca/news/2013/11/26/ban-seal-products-upsets-inuit/. Accessed 4 Jan 2014.
  3. Arnaquq-Baril, A. 2016. Angry Inuk. Nunavut: Unikkaat Studios Inc. https://www.nfb.ca/film/angry_inuk/
  4. Audia, T. 2014. The only people making money off the seal hunt are anti-sealing campaigners. The Huffington Post, 28 April, http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/terry-audla/sealing_b_5214956.html. Accessed 1 July 2015.
  5. Bandelj, N. 2002. Embedded economies: Social relations as determinants of foreign direct investment in central and eastern Europe. Social Forces 81 (2): 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandelj, N., and F. Wherry, eds. 2011. The cultural wealth of nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barry, D. 2005. Icy battleground: Canada, the international hunt for animal welfare, and the seal hunt. St John’s, NL: Breakwater Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Basu, S. 2015. The transitional dynamics of caloric ecosystems: Changes in the food supply around the world. Critical Public Health 25 (3): 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowcott, O. 2005. Gucci under fire as MPs back calls for sealskin ban. The Guardian, 15 November, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/nov/15/animalwelfare.environment. Accessed 7 July 2015.
  10. Braunsberger, K., and B. Buckler. 2009. What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research 64: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browne, A.J., V.L. Smye, and C. Varcoe. 2005. The relevance of postcolonial theoretical perspectives to research in Aboriginal health. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 37 (4): 16–37.Google Scholar
  12. Burnett, K., K. Skinner, and J. LeBlanc. 2015. From food mail to nutrition north Canada: Reconsidering federal food subsidy programs for northern Ontario. Canadian Food Studies 2 (1): 141–156.Google Scholar
  13. Cartner-Morley, J. 2005. Fashion’s appetite for fur returns to catwalk. The Guardian, 31 March, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/mar/31/environment.fashion. Accessed 7 July 2015.
  14. CBC News (Canada Broadcasting Company News). 2015. Nunavut wins EU exemption for seal hunt: move clears way for resumption of pelt sales to Europe. Canada Broadcasting Company News, 3 August, http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nunavut-wins-eu-exemption-for-seal-hunt-1.3177446. Accessed 15 Aug 2015.
  15. Chrisjohn, R., S. Young, and M. Maraun. 2006. The circle game: Shadows and subsistence in the Indian residential school experience in Canada. Penticton, BC: Theytus Books.Google Scholar
  16. Council of European Communities. 1983. Council Directive of 28 March 1983 concerning the importation into member states of skins of certain seal pups and products derived therefrom. Official Journal of the European Communities 91 (30). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:l28039. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.
  17. Damman, S., W.B. Eide, and H.V. Kuhnlein. 2008. Indigenous peoples’ nutrition transition in a right to food perspective. Food Policy 33: 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daschuk, J. 2015. CAFS Keynote Address: Food and health on the western reserves: The deep roots of Indigenous food insecurity. http://cafs.landfood.ubc.ca/en/?page_id=1179. Accessed June 2, 2015
  19. Dauvergne, P. 2008. The shadows of consumption: Consequences for the global environment. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dauvergne, P., and K.J. Neville. 2011. Mindbombs of right and wrong: Cycles of contention in the activist campaign to stop Canada’s seal hunt. Environmental Politics 20 (2): 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, J. 2015. Hunting for solutions to the Nunavut food-cost crisis. Rabble. http://rabble.ca/news/2015/02/hunting-solutions-to-nunavut-food-cost-crisis. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  22. Egeland, G.M., L. Johnson-Down, Z.R. Cao, N. Sheikh, and H. Weiler. 2011. Food Insecurity and nutrition transition combine to affect nutrient intakes in Canadian arctic communities. The Journal of Nutrition 141 (9): 1746–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. 2015. Trade in seal products. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/animal_welfare/seals/seal_hunting.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2015.
  24. European Parliament. 1983. Official Journal of the European Communities: Debates of the European Parliament No. 1-282. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7fb2f4cc-b056-49cf-aa6d-baf76b90575a/language-en. Accessed 21 Dec 2015.
  25. European Parliament. 2009. MEPs adopt strict conditions for the placing on the market of seal products in the European Union. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+IM-PRESS+20090504IPR54952+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN. Accessed 21 Dec 2015.
  26. European Parliament and Council. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of September 2009 on trade in seal products. EUR-Lex: Access to European Law. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/?uri = celex%3A32009R1007. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  27. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2015. Myths and realities of the seal harvest http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/seal-phoque/myth-eng.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
  28. Fitzgerald, P.L. 2011. “Morality” may not be enough to justify the EU seal products ban: Animal welfare meets international trade law. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 14: 85–136.Google Scholar
  29. Friedmann, H. 1999. Remaking traditions: How we eat, what we eat, and the changing political economy of food. In Women working the NAFTA food chain: Women, food, and globalization, ed. D. Barndt, 36–60. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  30. Friedmann, H. 2005. From colonialism to green capitalism: Social movements and emergence of food regimes. In Research in rural sociology and development, eds. F. Buttel, and P. McMichael, 11, 227–264. Bingely: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Ebook.Google Scholar
  31. Galloway, T. 2014. Is the Nutrition North Canada retail subsidy program meeting the goal of making nutritious and perishable food more accessible and affordable in the North? Canadian Public Health 105 (5): e395–e397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gombay, N. 2009. Sharing or commoditising? A discussion of some of the socio-economic implications of Nunavik’s hunter support program. Polar Record 45 (2): 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gombay, N. 2010. Making a living: Place, food, and economy in an Inuit community. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK: Purich Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  34. Grande, S.M.A. 1999. Beyond the ecologically noble savage: Deconstructing the white man’s. Indian Environmental Ethics 21 (3): 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grey, S., and R. Patel. 2015. Food sovereignty as decolonization: Some contributions from Indigenous movements to food system and development politics. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (3): 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hannigan, J. 2006. Environmental sociology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hansen, P. 2002. European integration, European identity and the colonial connection. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (4): 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harding, R. 2006. Historical representations of Aboriginal people in the Canadian news media. Discourse & Society 17 (2): 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harter, J.H. 2004. Environmental justice for whom? Class, new social movements, and the environment: A case study of Greenpeace Canada, 1971–2000. Labour/Le Travail 54: 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huffington Post. 2014. “Sealfies” protest Ellen DeGeneres’s anti-seal hunt stance (TWEETS). The Huffington Post, 28 March, http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/03/28/sealfies-ellen-degeneres-seal-hunt_n_5046394.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.
  41. Hughes, Z. 2015. Alaska’s Native Youth Olympics offer nest for indigenous values; Neither game nor sport, an annual tournament particular to Alaska builds on the subsistence traditions of whalers, seal hunters and life in the high north. The Guardian, 20 April, https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/apr/20/alaskas-native-youth-olympics-offer-nest-for-indigenous-values. Accessed 20 Oct 2015.
  42. Inglehart, R., and J.R. Rabier. 1978. Economic uncertainty and European solidarity: Public opinion trends. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 440: 66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. 2008. Inuit Statistical Profile. https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/InuitStatisticalProfile2008_0.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
  44. Knezevic, I. 2009. Hunting and environmentalism: Conflict or misperceptions. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koç, M., R. MacRae, E. Desjardins, and W. Roberts. 2008. Getting civil about food: The interactions between civil society and the state to advance sustainable food systems in Canada. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3 (2–3): 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuhnlein, H.V., O. Receveur, R. Soueida, and G.M. Egeland. 2004. Arctic Indigenous peoples experience the nutrition transition with changing dietary patterns and obesity. The Journal of Nutrition 134 (6): 1447–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lockie, S. 2006. Capturing the sustainability agenda: Organic foods and media discourses on food scares, environment, genetic engineering, and health. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (3): 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martens, K. 2014. APTN investigates: Reporter on story about people to turning to the dump for food: “People needed to see it.” Aboriginal Peoples Television Network. http://aptn.ca/news/2014/12/05/people-needed-see-aptn-investigates-reporter-story-people-turning-dump-food/. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.
  49. Martin, D. 2012. Nutrition transition and the public-health crisis: Aboriginal perspectives on food and eating. In Critical perspectives in food studies, eds. M. Koç, J. Sumner, and A. Winson, 208–222. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2016. Landings and landed value. http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca/stats/landings/index.html. Accessed 6 March 2015.
  51. Nunatsiaq News. 2011. Iceland to join Canada and Norway Seal Ban challenge. Nunatsiaq News.http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/article/110422_iceland_to_join_canada_and_norway_seal_ban_challenge. Accessed June 14, 2017.
  52. Nunavut Bureau of Statistics. 2016. Food price survey. http://www.stats.gov.nu.ca/en/Economic%20prices.aspx. Accessed 1 March 2017.
  53. Nunavut Department of Environment. N.d. Challenges to trade. http://www.sealingnunavut.ca/Challenges%20to%20trade. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  54. Ofstehage, A. 2012. The construction of an alternative quinoa economy: Balancing solidarity, household needs, and profit in San Agustín, Bolivia. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (4): 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pal, S., F. Haman, and M.A. Robidoux. 2013. The costs of local food procurement in two northern Indigenous communities in Canada. Food and Foodways 21 (2): 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Philips, R.B. 1999. Nuns, ladies, and “queen of the Huron:” Appropriating the savage in nineteenth-century Huron tourist art. In Unpacking culture: Unpacking art and commodity in colonial and postcolonial worlds, eds. R. B. Philips, and C. B. Steiner, 33–50. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, ebook.Google Scholar
  57. Portes, A. 2010. Economic sociology: A systematic inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Puxley, C. 2015. Voter turnout up by 270 per cent in some Aboriginal communities. The Toronto Star, 25 October, http://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/25/voter-turnout-up-by-270-per-cent-in-some-aboriginal-communities.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
  59. Radio-Canada. 2008. Un film choc. Radio-Canada. http://archives.radio-canada.ca/sports/protection_environnement/clips/5752/. Accessed 1 June 2015.
  60. Reid, J., and M. Rout. 2016. Getting to know your food: the insights of indigenous thinking in food provenance. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2): 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rennie, S. 2014. Nutrition North food subsidy program: What went wrong. Canadian Broadcasting Company News. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nutrition-north-food-subsidy-program-what-went-wrong-1.2880756. Accessed 15 July 2015.
  62. Searles, E. 2002. Food and the making of modern Inuit identities. Food & Foodways 10: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Searles, E. 2016. To sell or not to sell: Country food markets and Inuit identity in Nunavut. Food and Foodways 24 (3–4): 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simon, M. 2009. Inuit on sealing: We want your mind, not your money. The Globe and Mail, 11 March, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/inuit-on-sealing-we-want-your-mind-not-your-money/article1199793/ Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  65. Skov, L. 2005. The return of the fur coat: A commodity chain perspective. Current Sociology 53 (1): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, D.E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  67. Statistics Canada. 2013. Table 2: Amount of meat and fish eaten in the household that is country food, Inuit adults aged 15 and over, by region, 2006. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-637-x/2008004/art/art1-eng.htm. Accessed 5 March 2016.
  68. Statistics Canada. 2017. Study: Food insecurity among Inuit living in Inuit Nunangat, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/170201/dq170201a-eng.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2017.
  69. Stevenson, L. 2012. The psychic life of biopolitics: Survival, cooperation, and Inuit community. American Ethnologist 39 (3): 592–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Street, A. 2015. Food as pharma: Marketing nutraceuticals to India’s rural poor. Critical Public Health 25 (3): 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sun News. 2013. WTO approves EU seal ban: Canoe video archive interview with Auju [sic, Aaju] Peter. http://video.canoe.com/archive/source/london-free-press-category/wto-upholds-eu-seal-ban-canadian-inuit-outraged/2866235918001/page/3609#2867177004001. Accessed 3 March 2015.
  72. Sykes, K. 2014. Sealing animal welfare into the GATT exceptions: The international dimension of animal welfare in WTO disputes. World Trade Review 13 (3): 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Talaga, T. 2015. Behind the scenes on the push to rock the indigenous vote. The Star, 23 October, http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/10/23/behind-the-scenes-on-the-push-to-rock-the-indigenous-vote.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.
  74. Thow, A.M. 2009. Trade liberalisation and the nutrition transition: Mapping the pathways for public health nutritionists. Public Health Nutrition 12 (11): 2150–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tuhiwai Smith, L. 2005. On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In The landscape of qualitative research, eds. N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 113–144. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Tuhiwai Smith, L. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed. ebook.Google Scholar
  77. Veteto, J.R. 2008. The history and survival of traditional heirloom vegetable varieties in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina. Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vice Food LLC. 2015. The politics of food: Trailer. http://munchies.vice.com/show/the-politics-of-food. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  79. Waitt, G. 2014. Embodied geographies of kangaroo meat. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (4): 406–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wegge, N. 2013. Politics between science, law and sentiments: Explaining the European Union’s ban on trade in seal products. Environmental Politics 22 (2): 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wherry, F. 2007. Trading impressions: Evidence from Costa Rica. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610 (1): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. WTO (World Trade Organization). 2015. European Communities—Measures prohibiting the importation and marketing of seal products. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds400_e.htm Accessed 1 Oct 2015.
  83. Zelizer, V.A. 1979. Morals and markets: The development of life insurance in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations