Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 441–456 | Cite as

Drawing lines in the cornfield: an analysis of discourse and identity relations across agri-food networks

  • Sarah Rotz
Article

Abstract

In this article, I analyze discourse and identity relations within so-called ‘conventional’ agri-food networks as well as how the conventional sphere perceives, constructs and responds to alternative food movements in Canada. The paper is structured around three primary research questions: (1) How are conventional actors understanding conditions, changes, and challenges within conventional networks? (2) How do conventional actors apply this understanding in advancing conventional interests and discourses, and defending conventional networks? (3) How do conventional actors and discourse construct AFMs? For this research, I draw from survey, focus group, and in-depth interview data alongside text analysis from online sources. I elucidate the interests and motivations behind the identities, stories and messages emerging from the conventional sphere. I conclude that relationship building and communication between diverse agri-food actors may help to expand the range of agricultural knowledge, philosophies and solutions available to farmers, especially those whom are currently quite divided.

Keywords

Agri-food networks Power Discourse Identity Conventional agriculture Alternative food movements (AFM) 

Abbreviations

AFM

Alternative food movement

DSS

Decision support systems

GMO

Genetically modified organism

FCC

Farm Credit Canada

OMAFRA

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. As well, thank you to all of the research participants. This work is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships program (Grant No. CGV-SSHRC-00433).

References

  1. Agriculture More Than Ever. 2017a. Agriculture more than ever: A positive voice for Canadian agriculture. Agriculture More Than Ever.Google Scholar
  2. Agriculture More Than Ever. 2017b. Why doesn’t Ag more than ever speak to consumers? Agriculture More Than Ever.Google Scholar
  3. Agriculture More Than Ever. 2017c. Top 10 reasons to celebrate Canadian agriculture. Agriculture More Than Ever.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. C. 1992. Citizen and enemy as symbolic classification: On the polarizing discourse of civil society. In: Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality, ed. Michèle Lamont, 289–308. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alkon, A. H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. The food movement as polyculture. Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. Alison Hope Alkon and Julian Agyeman, 1–20. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Altieri, M. 1995. Agroecology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Altieri, M., and V. M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 38: 587–612. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrée, P., J. Dibden, V. Higgins, and C. Cocklin. 2010. Competitive productivism and Australia’s emerging “alternative” agri-food networks: Producing for farmers’ markets in Victoria and beyond. Australian Geographer 41: 307–322. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2010.498038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrée, P., P. Ballamingie, and B. Sinclair-Waters. 2014. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in Eastern Ontario. Local Environment 9839: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.908277.Google Scholar
  10. Bain, C., T. Selfa, T. Dandachi, and S. Velardi. 2017. “Superweeds” or “survivors”? Framing the problem of glyphosate resistant weeds and genetically engineered crops. Journal of Rural Studies 51: 211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Banham, Russ. 2014. Who owns farmers’ big data? Forbes.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, S. E., A. Hullinger, and L. Brislen. 2015. Manipulated masculinities: Agribusiness, deskilling, and the rise of the businessman-farmer in the United States. Rural Sociology 80: 285–313. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowman, A. 2014. Stop letting “crunchy mommas” tell your story. In: Pork network. Lenexa, KS: Vance Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Bronson, K., and I. Knezevic. 2016. Food studies scholars can no longer ignore the rise of big data. Canadian Food Studies 3: 9–19. doi: 10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.138.Google Scholar
  15. Bryant, R. L., and M. K. Goodman. 2004. Consuming narratives: The political ecology of “alternative” consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29: 344–366. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bufkin, M. 2015. The truth about “agvocating”. In: The truth about agriculture. Logan: Utah State University.Google Scholar
  17. Burton, R. J. F. 2004. Seeing through the “good farmer”s’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of “productivist” behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis 44: 195–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burton, R. J. F. 2012. Understanding farmers’ aesthetic preference for tidy agricultural landscapes: A bourdieusian perspective. Landscape Research 37: 51–71. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.559311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bye, L. M. 2009. “How to be a rural man”: Young men’s performances and negotiations of rural masculinities. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 278–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cadieux, K. V., and R. Slocum. 2015. What does it mean to do food justice?. Journal of Political Ecology 22: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Camargo, G. G. T., M. R. Ryan, and T. L. Richard. 2013. Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. BioScience 63: 263–273. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caplan, P. 2013. Food, health and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Carbonell, I. M. 2016. The ethics of big data in big agriculture. Internet Policy Review 5: 1–13. doi: 10.14763/2016.1.405.Google Scholar
  24. Carolan, M. 2005. Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology 70: 387–413. doi: 10.1526/0036011054831233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carolan, M. 2016. Publicising food: Big data, precision agriculture and co-experimental techniques of addition. Sociologia Ruralis 0: 2–31. doi: 10.1002/acr.22212.Google Scholar
  26. Coldwell, I. 2007. New farming masculinities: “More than just shit-kickers”, we’re “switched-on” farmers wanting to “balance lifestyle, sustainability and coin”. Journal of Sociology 43: 87–103. doi: 10.1177/1440783307073936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Connell, R. W. 2001. Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities. Social Thought & Research 24: 13–31.Google Scholar
  28. Crop Life International. 2017. @CropLifeIntl [Twitter profile]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/CropLifeIntl.
  29. Daynard, K. 2015. Speak up for agriculture: How to talk to consumers about ag and food. Farm & Food Care Ontario. Agriculture More Than Ever.Google Scholar
  30. Dixon, J., and C. Richards. 2016. On food security and alternative food networks: Understanding and performing food security in the context of urban bias. Agriculture and Human Values 33: 191–202. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9630-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farms.com. 2017. Precision agriculture. Farms.com.Google Scholar
  32. Flick, U. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Garnett, T., M. C. Appleby, A. Balmford, I. J. Bateman, T. G. Benton, P. Bloomer, and B. Burlingame, et al. 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science Magazine 341: 33–34. doi: 10.1126/science.1234485.Google Scholar
  34. Gliessman, S. 2007. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grossberg, L. 1986. On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with stuart hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10: 45–60. doi: 10.1177/019685998601000204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39: 1171–1183. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.908277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guthman, J., and S. Brown. 2015. I will never eat another strawberry again: The biopolitics of consumer-citizenship in the fight against methyl iodide in California. Agriculture and Human Values 33: 575–585. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9626-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guthman, J. and Michael Watts. 2011. Excess consumption or over-production? US farm policy, global warming, and the bizarre attribution of obesity. In Global political ecology, ed. Richard Peet, 51–66. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, S., and P. Du Gay. 1996. Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Higgins, V., J. Dibden, and C. Cocklin. 2015. Private agri-food governance and greenhouse gas abatement: Constructing a corporate carbon economy. Geoforum 66: 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Howard, P. H. 2009a. Consolidation in the North American Organic Food Processing Sector, 1997 to 2007. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food 16: 13–30.Google Scholar
  42. Howard, P. H. 2009b. Organic industry structure. Media-N: Journal of the New Media Caucus 5. http://median.s151960.gridserver.com/?.
  43. Jaffee, D., and P. H. Howard. 2009. Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values 27: 387–399. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9231-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janzen, T. 2017. America’s first Ag data case. Janzen Ag Law.Google Scholar
  45. Jarosz, L. 2000. Understanding agri-food networks as social relations. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 279–283. doi: 10.1023/A:1007692303118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leach, B. 2011. Gender in a global/local world: Reshaping gender and class in rural spaces. Farnham: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Levkoe, C. Z. 2006. Learning democracy through food justice movements. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 89–98. doi: 10.1007/s10460-005-5871-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Levkoe, C. Z. 2014. The food movement in Canada: A social movement network perspective. Journal of Peasant Studies 41: 385–403. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.910766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levkoe, C. Z., M. Bebee, S. Wakefield, E. Castel, and C. Dávila. 2012. Propagating the food movement: Provincial networks and social mobilization in Canada. Montreal: Food Secure Canada.Google Scholar
  50. Liamputtong, P. 2012. Qualitative research methods, 4th edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. License to Farm. 2016. Berteig imaging.Google Scholar
  52. Liepins, R. 2000. Making men: The construction and representation of agriculture-based masculinities in Australia and New Zealand. Rural Sociology 65: 605–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00046.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lockie, S. 2006. Networks of agri-environmental action: Temporality, spatiality and identity in agricultural environments. Sociologia Ruralis 46: 22–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00400.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lockie, S. 2009. Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: Assembling the “citizen consumer”. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 193–201. doi: 10.1007/s10460-008-9155-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lyndsey Smith. 2016. @realloudlyndsey [Twitter moment]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/realloudlyndsey.
  56. Lynch, D., R. MacRae, and R. C. Martin. 2011. The carbon and global warming potential impacts of organic farming: Does it have a significant role in an energy constrained world? Sustainability 3: 322–362. doi: 10.3390/su3020322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. MacRae, R., D. Lynch, and R. C. Martin. 2010. Improving energy efficiency and GHG mitigation potentials in Canadian organic farming systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34: 549–580. doi: 10.1080/10440046.2010.484704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Matson, P. A., W. J. Parton, A. G. Power, and M. J. Swift. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504–509. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McInnes, A., E. Fraser, Z. Gedalof, and J. Silver. 2017. A quantitative analysis of food movement convergence in four Canadian provinces. Agriculture and Human Values. doi: 10.1007/s10460-017-9775-y.Google Scholar
  60. Morgan, K., and J. Murdoch. 2000. Organic vs. conventional agriculture: Knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum 31: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Murdoch, J. 2000. Networks: A new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 16: 407–419. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nagel, C. 2016. Real Dirt on farming: Communicating your message with confidence. Farm & Food Care.Google Scholar
  63. O’Neill, K. J. 2014. Situating the “alternative” within the “conventional”: Local food experiences from the East Riding of Yorkshire, UK. Journal of Rural Studies 35: 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ortner, S. B. 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Woman, culture, and society, eds. M. Z. Rosaldo, and L. Lamphere, 68–87. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Pini, B. 2004. Managerial masculinities in the Australian sugar industry. Rural Society 14: 22–35. doi: 10.5172/rsj.351.14.1.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Practical Pathways to Drive Real Results. 2015. Precision agriculture conference. London, ON: Practical Pathways to Drive Real Results.Google Scholar
  67. Rotz, S., and E. D. G. Fraser. 2015. Resilience and the industrial food system: Analyzing the impacts of agricultural industrialization on food system vulnerability. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5: 459–473. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0277-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rotz, S., E. D. G. Fraser, and R. C. Martin. 2017. Situating tenure, capital and finance in farmland relations: Implications for stewardship and agroecological health in Ontario, Canada. The Journal of Peasant Studies. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1351953.Google Scholar
  69. Ruby, M. B., and S. J. Heine. 2011. Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite 56: 447–450. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. SaskCanola. 2016. License to farm. Saskatoon: SaskCanola.Google Scholar
  71. Sbicca, J. 2015. Food labor, economic inequality, and the imperfect politics of process in the alternative food movement. Agriculture and Human Values 32: 675–687. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9582-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneider, M. 2015. Wasting the rural: Meat, manure, and the politics of agro-industrialization in contemporary China. Geoforum. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.001.Google Scholar
  73. Sonnino, R., and T. Marsden. 2006. Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 181–199. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Statistics Canada. 2011. 2011 census of agriculture. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  75. Vogt, W. 2016. On a mission to “agvocate”. Farm Industry News, October 4.Google Scholar
  76. Weis, T. 2013. The meat of the global food crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies 40: 65–85. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.752357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winson, A. 2004. Bringing political economy into the debate on the obesity epidemic. Agriculture and Human Values 21: 299–312. doi: 10.1007/s10460-003-1206-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Winson, A. 2013. The industrial diet: The degradation of food and the struggle for healthy eating. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wolf, S. A., and F. H. Buttel. 1996. The political economy of precision farming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright, D. 2015. Monsanto’s precision agriculture pipeline and strategy. In Precision agriculture conference. London: Ontario.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations