Food sovereignty education across the Americas: multiple origins, converging movements

  • David Meek
  • Katharine Bradley
  • Bruce Ferguson
  • Lesli Hoey
  • Helda Morales
  • Peter Rosset
  • Rebecca Tarlau
Article

Abstract

Social movements are using education to generate critical consciousness regarding the social and environmental unsustainability of the current food system, and advocate for agroecological production. In this article, we explore results from a cross-case analysis of six social movements that are using education as a strategy to advance food sovereignty. We conducted participatory research with diverse rural and urban social movements in the United States, Brazil, Cuba, Bolivia, and Mexico, which are each educating for food sovereignty. We synthesize insights from critical food systems education and the political ecology of education in analyzing these cases. We compare the thematic similarities and difference between these movements’ education initiatives in terms of their emergence, initial goals, expansion and institutionalization, relationship to the state, theoretical inspirations, pedagogical approach, educational topics, approach to student research, and outcomes. Among these thematic areas, we find that student-centered research on competing forms of production is an integral way to advance critical consciousness about the food system and the political potential of agroecological alternatives. However, what counts, as success in these programs, is highly case-dependent. For engaged scholars committed to advancing education for food sovereignty, it is essential to reflect upon the lessons learned and challenges faced by these movements.

Keywords

Food sovereignty Critical pedagogy Education Critical food systems education Political ecology of education Social movements 

Abbreviations

ANAP

National Association of Small Farmers (Cuba)

CaC

Campesino a Campesino (Cuba)

CPATI

Colonia Pirai Agroecological Technical Institute (Bolivia)

EBUFFS

East Bay Urban Farmer Field School (USA)

FW

Food Warriors (USA)

LabVida

Laboratorios para la Vida (Mexico)

MACaC

Farmer-to-Farmer Agroecology Movement (Cuba)

MST

Landless Workers Movement (Brazil)

Notes

Acknowledgements

Each of the authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the farmers and activists with which we worked. Bradley’s work with EBUFFS was financially supported by the AFRI project: Food Dignity.

References

  1. Apple, M.W. 2006. Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa, L.P. 2015. Educación, resistencia y movimientos sociales: La práxis educativo-política de los Sin Tierra y de los Zapatistas. Mexico City: LIBRUNAM.Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa, L.P. 2016. Educação do campo [Education for and by the countryside] as a political project in the context of the struggle for land in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1119120.Google Scholar
  4. Baronnet, B. 2008. Rebel youth and Zapatista autonomous education. Latin American Perspectives 35 (4): 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, K., and H. Herrera. 2016. Decolonizing food justice: Naming, resisting, and researching colonizing forces in the movement. Antipode 48(1): 97-114.Google Scholar
  6. Branford, S., and J. Rocha. 2002. Cutting the wire: The story of the Landless Movement in Brazil. London: Latin America Bureau.Google Scholar
  7. Cadji, J., and A. Alkon. 2014. One day, the white people are going to want these houses again. In Incomplete streets: Processes, practices and possibilities, eds. S. Zavestoski, and J. Agyeman, 154–175. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Caldart, R.S. 2004. Pedagogia do Movimento Sem Terra. Sao Paulo: Expresso Popular.Google Scholar
  9. Carnoy, M. 1985. The political economy of education. International Social Science Journal 37 (2): 157–173.Google Scholar
  10. Carolan, M.S. 2006. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agriculture and Human Values 23 (3): 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caron, P., et al. 2014. Making transition towards ecological intensification of agriculture a reality: The gaps in and the role of scientific knowledge. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8: 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, M., ed. 2015. Challenging social inequality: The Landless Rural Worker’s Movement and agrarian reform in Brazil. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, M., and H.M. Carvalho. 2015. The struggle on the land: Source of growth, innovation, and constant challenge for the MST. In Challenging social inequality: The Landless Rural Worker’s Movement and agrarian reform in Brazil, ed. M. S. Carter, Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cleaver, H.M.J. 1972. The contradictions of the Green Revolution. The American Economic Review 62 (1/2): 177–186.Google Scholar
  15. CPATI (Colonia Pirai Agroecological Technical Institute). 2015. Cuarenta Años de la Fundacion Colonia Pirai: Memoria Historica. Santa Cruz: CPATI (Colonia Pirai Agroecological Technical Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Daniel, P. 2013. Dispossession: Discrimination against African American farmers in the age of civil rights. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  17. Diniz-Pereira, J.E. 2005. Teacher education for social transformation and its links to progressive social movement: The case of the landless workers movement in Brazil. Journal for Critical Education Policy studies 3 (2): 92–123.Google Scholar
  18. Dissanayake, W. 1992. Knowledge, culture, and power: Some theoretical issues related to the agricultural knowledge and information system framework. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 5 (1): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eshuis, J., and M. Stuiver. 2005. Learning in context through conflict and alignment: Farmers and scientists in search of sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 22 (2): 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandes, B.M. 2009. Sobre a tipologia de territórios. In Territórios e territorialidades: Teoria, processos e conflitos, eds. M. A. Saquet, and E. S. Sposito, 197–215. Sao Paulo: Expressão Popular.Google Scholar
  21. Francis, C., T.A. Breland, E. Ostergaard, G. Lieblein, and S. Morse. 2013. Phenomenon-based learning in agroecology: A prerequisite for transdisciplinarity and responsible action. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37: 60–75.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, P. 1973a. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Freire, P. 1973b. Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  24. Freire, P., et al. 1986. Pedagogia: Diálogo e conflito. Sao Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
  25. Godek, W. 2015. Challenges for food sovereignty policy making: The case of Nicaragua’s Law 693. Third World Quarterly 36 (3): 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray, I., et al. 1997. Power, interests and the extension of sustainable agriculture. Sociologia ruralis 37 (1): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gruenewald, D.A. 2003. The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher 32 (4): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39: 1171–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henke, C.R. 2008. Cultivating science, harvesting power: Science and industrial agriculture in California. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heyneman, S.P. 2005. The history and problems in the making of education policy at the World Bank. In Global trends in educational policy, vol. 6, eds. A.W. Wiseman, and D.P. Baker. San Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilimire, K., S. Gillon, B.C. McLaughlin, B.M. Dowd, and K. Monsen. 2014. Food for thought: Developing curricula for sustainable food systems education programs. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38: 722–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holt-Gimenez, E. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer-to-farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  33. Ingram, J. 2008. Agronomist–farmer knowledge encounters: An analysis of knowledge exchange in the context of best management practices in England. Agriculture and Human Values 25 (3): 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IPEA. 2015. Relatório da II Pesquisa Nacional sobre a Educação na Reforma Agrária. Brasilia: Instituto de Pesquisa Aplicada.Google Scholar
  35. Klein, M. G., J.A. Girón, B. Hernández Zavaleta, M. López López, S.I. Navarro Martínez, B.C. Salazar Narvaéz, A. Saldívar Moreno, N.E. Santos Baca. 2014. Desde Chiapas: Criterios básicos para la exigencia de pertinencia cultural y lingüística en la educación, In Desenmascarar la discriminación: La violencia del sistema educativo mexicano hacia los pueblos originarios y las personas con discapacidad. eds. P.T. Baltazar, 69–94. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Mexico: Incidencia Civil en la Educación.Google Scholar
  36. Kloppenburg, J.R. 1988. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Leff, E. 2004. Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes. Significancia y sentido en la construcción de un futuro sustentable. Polis. Revista Latinoamericana 7: 1–29.Google Scholar
  38. Lerner, A.M., and H. Eakin. 2011. An obsolete dichotomy? Rethinking the rural-urban interface in terms of food security and production in the global south. Geographical Journal 177: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewontin, R., and R. Levins. 2007. Biology Under the Influence: Dialectical Essays on Ecology, Agriculture, and Health. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lieblein, G., T.A. Breland, E. Ostergard, L. Salomonsson, C. Francis. 2007. Educational perspectives in agroecology: Steps on a dual learning ladder toward responsible action. NACTA Journal 51: 37–44.Google Scholar
  41. Lomawaima, K.T., and T.L. McCarty. 2002. When tribal sovereignty challenges democracy: American Indian education and the democratic ideal. American Educational Research Journal 39 (2): 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Machín Sosa, B., A.M. Roque Jaime, D.R. Ávila Lozano, and P.M. Rosset. 2010. Revolución agroecológica: el movimiento de campesino a campesino de la ANAP en Cuba. Cuando el campesino ve, hace fe. La Habana: ANAP y La Vía Campesina. http://www.viacampesina.org/downloads/pdf/sp/2010-04-14-rev-agro.pdfGoogle Scholar
  43. Machín Sosa, B., et al. 2013. Agroecological revolution: The farmer-to-farmer movement of the ANAP in Cuba [online]. Havana and Jakarta: ANAP and La Vía Campesina. http://viacampesina.org/downloads/pdf/en/Agroecological-revolution-ENGLISH.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2016.
  44. McAdam, D., and D.A. Snow. 1997. Social movements: Readings on their emergence, mobilization, and dynamics. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  45. McCarthy, J., and M. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McClintock, N. 2011. From industrial garden to food desert: Demarcated devaluation in the flatlands of Oakland, California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, eds. A. H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 89–120. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. McCune, N., P. Rosset, T. Cruz, A. Sandíval, and H. Morales. 2016. Mediated territoriality: Rural workers and the efforts to scale out agroecology in Nicaragua. The Journal of Peasant Studies. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1233868Google Scholar
  48. Meek, D. 2015a. Learning as territoriality: The political ecology of education in the Brazilian landless workers’ movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1179–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meek, D. 2015b. Towards a political ecology of education: The educational politics of scale in southern Pará, Brazil. Environmental Education Research, 21 (3): 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meek, D. 2015c. Taking research with its roots: restructuring schools in the Brazilian landless workers’ movement upon the principles of a political ecology of education. Journal of Political Ecology 22: 410–428.Google Scholar
  51. Meek, D., and L.L. Simonian. 2016. Transforming space and society? The political ecology of education in the Brazilian Landless Workers’ Movement’s Jornada de Agroecologia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. doi:10.1177/0263775816667073.Google Scholar
  52. Meek, D., and R. Tarlau. 2015. Critical food systems education and the question of race. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 5 (4): 131–135.Google Scholar
  53. Meek, D., and R. Tarlau. 2016. Critical food systems education (CFSE): Educating for food sovereignty. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40(3): 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Molina, M.G. 2013. Agroecology and politics. How to get sustainabillty? About the necessity for a political agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37: 45–59.Google Scholar
  55. Moll, L. 2002. The concept of educational sovereignty. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education 1 (2): 1–11.Google Scholar
  56. Moll, L., and R. Ruiz. 2005. The educational sovereignty of Latino/a students in the United States. In Latino education: An agenda for community action research, eds. P. Pedraza, and M. Rivera, 295–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Morgan, K., and J. Murdoch. 2000. Organic vs. conventional agriculture: Knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum 31 (2): 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nelson, Alondra. 2011. Body and soul: The Black Panther Party and the fight against medical discrimination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosset, P.M. 2015. Epistemes rurales y la formación agroecológica en La Campesina. Revista Ciência & Tecnologia Social 2 (1): 4–13.Google Scholar
  60. Rosset, P.M., B.M. Sosa, A.M.R. Roque Jaime, and R.A. Ávila Lozano. 2011. The Campesino-to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 161–191.Google Scholar
  61. Rosset, P., and M.E. Martinez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory and process. Ecology and Society 17 (3): 17.Google Scholar
  62. Sawyer, S. 2004. Crude chronicles: Indigenous politics, multinational oil, and neoliberalism in Ecuador. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sbicca, Joshua. 2012. Growing food justice by planting an anti-oppression foundation: Opportunities and obstacles for a budding social movement. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (4): 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schiavoni, C.M. 2016. Historical, relational and interactive perspectives in food sovereignty research, ICAS Review Paper Series, no. 7.Google Scholar
  65. Shepherd, C.J. 2005. Imperial science: The Rockefeller Foundation and agricultural science in Peru, 1940–1960. Science as Culture 14 (2): 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tarlau, R. 2012. Soviets in the countryside: The MST’s remaking of socialist educational practices in Brazil. Logics of Socialist Education, 53–72. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Tarlau, R. 2015a. How do new critical pedagogies develop? Educational innovation, social change, and Landless Workers in Brazil. Teachers College Record 117 (11): 1–36.Google Scholar
  68. Tarlau, R. 2015b. Education of the countryside at a crossroads: Rural social movements and national policy reform in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1157–1177.Google Scholar
  69. Tarrow, S.G. 1994. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Thompson, J., and I. Scoones. 1994. Challenging the populist perspective: Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research, and extension practice. Agriculture and Human Values 11 (2): 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. White, M.M. 2010. Shouldering responsibility for the delivery of human rights: A case study of the D-Town Farmers of Detroit. Race/ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 3(2): 189–211.Google Scholar
  72. White, M.M. 2011. Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 5(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
  73. Wittman, H. 2011. Food sovereignty: A new rights framework for food and nature? Environment and Society: Advances in Research 2: 87–105.Google Scholar
  74. Wittman, H. 2015. From protest to policy: The challenges of institutionalizing food sovereignty. Canadian Food Studies 2 (2): 174–182.Google Scholar
  75. Wright, E.O. 2012. Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review 78 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright, A., and W. Wolford. 2003. To inherit the earth: The Landless Movement and the struggle for a new Brazil. Oakland: Food First!.Google Scholar
  77. Yin, R.K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Meek
    • 1
  • Katharine Bradley
    • 2
  • Bruce Ferguson
    • 3
  • Lesli Hoey
    • 4
  • Helda Morales
    • 3
  • Peter Rosset
    • 5
  • Rebecca Tarlau
    • 6
  1. 1.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.University of California-DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.ECOSURSan Cristóbal de Las CasasMexico
  4. 4.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.La Via Campesina/ECOSURSan Cristóbal de Las CasasMexico
  6. 6.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations