Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 941–953 | Cite as

Environmental justice and care: critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse

  • Daniela Gottschlich
  • Leonie Bellina
Article
  • 525 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainability has become a powerful discourse, guiding the efforts of various stakeholders to find strategies for dealing with current and future social-ecological crises. To overcome the latter, we argue that sustainability discourse needs to be based on a critical-emancipatory conceptualization. Therefore, we engage two such approaches—environmental justice approaches informed by a plural understanding of justice and feminist political economy ones focusing on care—and their analytical potential for productive critique of normative assumptions in the dominant sustainability discourse. Both of these approaches highlight aspects of sustainability that are particularly relevant today. First, although sustainable development was conceptualized from the outset based upon a twofold notion of justice (intra- and intergenerational), the integration of justice in the dominant sustainability discourse and praxis often manifests merely as a normative aspiration. Meanwhile, the environmental justice and care approaches offer conceptualizations of justice that can act as a powerful lever and as transformation-strategy. Second, the dominant sustainability discourse largely remains within a neoliberal economic framework that continues to promote economic growth as the means to reach prosperity while neglecting the bases of every economy: care work and nature. Its focus lies solely on paid work and the market economy. By integrating (a) social and ecological ‘reproductivity’ (unpaid care and subsistence work as well as nature) and (b) democratic processes for just distribution of environmental burdens and benefits, as well as participatory equity in relevant decision making, feminist political economy and environmental justice approaches offer substantial strategies towards building humane, just and caring societies.

Keywords

Environmental justice Feminist economics Sustainability to come 

Abbreviations

DAWN

Development Alternatives for Women for a New Era

CSA

Community supported agriculture

UNCED

United Nations Conference on Environment and Development

WCED

World Commission on Environment and Development

UN Rio+20

United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development

UCCCRJ

United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice

References

  1. Adams, B., and G. Luchsinger. 2015. The 2015 declaration: Meeting great expectations (maybe). http://www.globalpolicywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/GPW2-2015_03_03.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2015.
  2. Agarwal, B. 1992. The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies 18(1): 119–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agyeman, J. 2005. Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman (eds.). 2011. Cultivating food justice: Race, class and sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alston, D. 1991. Speech delivered at the first national people of color environmental leadership summit. http://reimaginerpe.org/20years/alston. Accessed 07 September 2015.
  6. Bellina, L. 2016. Feeding cities sustainably: The contribution of a ‘zero-foodwaste-city’ to sustainable development goal 2, ‘zero hunger’. In EURSAFE. 2016. Food Futures. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., and M. Mies. 1997. Eine Kuh für Hillary: Die Subsistenzperspektive. München: Verlag Frauenoffensive.Google Scholar
  8. Biesecker, A., P. Darooka, D. Gottschlich, M. Lanuza, U. Röhr, C. Schildberg, M. Tovar-Restrepo, and V. Dias Ventura. 2014. A caring and sustainable economy: A concept note from a feminist perspective. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/10809.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2015.
  9. Biesecker, A., and S. Hofmeister. 2010. Focus: (Re)productivity: Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders. Ecological Economics 69(8): 1703–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biesecker, A., M. Mathes, S. Schön, and B. Scurrell (eds.). 2000. Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften: Auf dem Weg zu einer Ökonomie des Guten Lebens. Bielefeld: Kleine.Google Scholar
  11. Brand, U., and M. Wissen. 2011. Sozial-ökologische Krise und Imperialistische Lebensweise. In VielfachKrise, ed. A. Demirovic, J. Dück, F. Becker, and P. Bader, 79–94. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, C. 2010. On Amartya Sen and “The idea of justice”. http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/journal/24_3/review_essays/001.html. Accessed 15 January 2015.
  13. Braidotti, R., E. Charkiewicz, S. Häusler, and S. Wierings (eds.). 1994. Women, the environment and sustainable development: towards a theoretical synthesis. London: Zed books.Google Scholar
  14. Bryant, B. 2011. Environmental crisis or crisis of epistemology? Working for sustainable knowledge and environmental justice. Garden City: Morgan James.Google Scholar
  15. Bullard, R.D. 1999. Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bullard, R.D. 2005. The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  17. Carmin, J., and J. Agyeman (eds.). 2011. Environmental inequalities beyond borders. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  18. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2002. Environmental justice policy. Boston: State House.Google Scholar
  19. Curry, J.C. 2002. Care theory and “caring” systems of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 19(2): 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DAWN. 1995a. Development Alternatives for Women for a New Era. Markers on the way: The DAWN debates on alternative development. DAWN’s platform for the fourth world conference on women. Beijing, Barbados: DAWN.Google Scholar
  21. DAWN. 1995b. Rethinking social development: DAWN’s vision. World Development 23(11): 2001–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DAWN. 2015. About us. History. http://www.dawnnet.org/about.php?page=history. Accessed 15 January 2015.
  23. Del Bene, D. 2014. India’s national alliance of people’s movement: 20 years of struggle. http://www.ejolt.org/2014/11/the-rise-of-a-movement-of-movements-in-india. Accessed 5 August 2015.
  24. Derrida, J., and A. Dufourmantelle. 2000. Of Hospitality. Stanford: SU Press.Google Scholar
  25. Derrida, J. 2005. Rogues: Two essays on reason. Stanford: SU Press.Google Scholar
  26. Derrida, J. 2010 [1994]. Spectres of marx: The state of debt, the work of mourning and the new international. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Dingler, J. 2003. Postmoderne und Nachhaltigkeit: Eine diskurstheoretische Analyse der sozialen Konstruktionen von nachhaltiger Entwicklung. München: oekom.Google Scholar
  28. Escobar, A. 2011. Encountering development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. EU Commission. 2012. Sustainable growth—for a resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-a-nutshell/priorities/sustainable-growth/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 March 2015.
  30. Field, R.C. 1998. Risk and justice: Capitalist production and the environment. In The struggle for ecological democracy: Environmental justice movements in the United States, ed. D. Faber, 81–103. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fraser, N. 2000. Rethinking recognition. http://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition. Accessed 12 March 2015.
  32. General Assembly. 2012. The future we want, resolution 66/288, 11 September 2012. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/broaderprogress/pdf/GA%20Resolution%20-%20The%20future%20we%20want. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  33. Gottlieb, R., and A. Joshi. 2013. Food justice. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  34. Gottschlich, D. 2013. Kommende Nachhaltigkeit: Bausteine für ein kritisch-emanzipatorisches Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung aus feministischer, diskurstheoretischer Perspektive. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Social Science. Osnabrück: Universität Osnabrück.Google Scholar
  35. Gottschlich, D., S. Roth, A. Härtel, U. Röhr, S. Hackfort, D. Segebart, and C. König. 2014. Sustainable economy between gender, care and green economy. Debates—interfaces—blind spots. CaGE texts No. 1. http://www.cage-online.de. Accessed 26 February 2015.
  36. Guha, R. 1997. Varieties of environmentalism: Essays north and south. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Harcourt, W. (ed.). 1994. Feminist perspectives on sustainable development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. Hauff, V. 1987. Vorwort. In Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft: Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung, vol. X–XVII, ed. V. Hauff. Greven: Eggenkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Hochschild, A. 2001. Globale Betreuungsketten und emotionaler Mehrwert. In Die Zukunft des globalen Kapitalismus, ed. W. Hutton, and A. Giddens, 156–176. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  40. Hofmeister, S., C. Katz, and T. Mölders (eds.). 2013. Geschlechterverhältnisse und Nachhaltigkeit: Die Kategorie Geschlecht in den Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  41. Holt-Giménez, E. 2011. Food security, food justice, or food sovereignty? Crises, food movements, and regime change. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 309–330. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jochimsen, M., and U. Knobloch. 2000. Eine Idee wächst. In Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften: Auf dem Weg zu einer Ökonomie des Guten Lebens, ed. A. Biesecker, M. Mathes, S. Schön, and B. Scurrell, 15–16. Bielefeld: Kleine.Google Scholar
  43. Jochimsen, M. 2003. Careful economics. Integration caring activities and economic science. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, V. 2008. Green collar economy: How one solution can fix our two biggest problems. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  45. Kontos, M. 2010. Europäische Politiken im Zuge der Globalisierung von Pflegearbeit. http://www.gwi-boell.de/downloads/Kontos_Europaeische_Politiken_zu_globalisierter_Pflegearbeit_Mai2010.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2015.
  46. Kothari, A., and S. Lovera. 2015. About dignity and transformation—Where will the SDGs lead us? Blog from the global forest coalition. https://peopleforestsrights.wordpress.com/. Accessed 26 February 2015.
  47. Langer, A., and L. Bellina. 2017. Diskursanalyse und Feministische Kritik(en). In Diskursanalyse und Kritik, eds. A. Langer, M. Nonhoff, and M. Reisigl. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Massarrat, M. 2006. Kapitalismus—Machtungleichheit—Nachhaltigkeit: Perspektiven Revolutionärer Reformen. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  49. Matthews, D. 2013. The democracy to come: Notes on the thought of Jacques Derrida. http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/04/16/the-democracy-to-come-notes-on-the-thought-of-jacques-derrida/. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  50. Muraca, B. 2012. Towards a fair degrowth-society: Justice and the right to a ‘good life’ beyond growth. Futures 44(6): 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nayar, A. 2011. Rio+20 Intersessional, 15–16 December 2011, Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era on behalf of the Women’s Major Group. http://www.dawnnet.org/uploads/documents/WEBSITE_RIO20_Anita_Intervention%20at%20Rio+20%20Intersessional_2011-Dec-16.PDF. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  52. Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Oxford: OU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rajan, R. 2014. A history of environmental justice in India. Environmental Justice 7(5): 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rawls, J. 2005 [1971]. A theory of justice: Original edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  55. Redclift, M. 2005. Sustainable development (1987–2005)—An oxymoron comes of age. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ha/v12n25/a04v1225. Accessed 26 January 2015.
  56. Salleh, A. 2009. Ecological debt: Embodied debt. eco-sufficiency and global justice. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  57. Schlosberg, D. 2007. Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: OU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sen, A. 1999. Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sen, G., and C. Grown. 1987. Development, crises and alternative visions. Third world women’s perspectives. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  60. Shiva, V. 1999. Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  61. Shrader-Frechette, K. 2002. Environmental justice: Creating equity, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: OU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stephenson, M., and L.A. Schweitzer. 2011. Learning from the quest of environmental justice in the Niger River Delta. In Environmental inequalities beyond borders, ed. J. Carmin, and J. Agyeman, 45–66. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, V. 2000. Marketisation of governance: Critical feminist perspectives from the south. Cape Town: SADEP.Google Scholar
  64. Tronto, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Tronto, J. 2013. Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  66. UCCCRJ—United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. 1987. Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national report on the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. New York: United Church of Christ.Google Scholar
  67. UN—United Nations. 2002. Johannesburg declaration on sustainable development. A/CONF.199/20. http://www.un-documents.net/jburgdec.htm. Accessed 26 September 2014.
  68. United Nations. 2008. Universal rights of indigenous people. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2015.
  69. Weber, E. 2005. Deconstruction is Justice. German Law Journal 6(1): 179–184.Google Scholar
  70. Well, B.L., and S. Gradwell. 2001. Gender and resource management: Community supported agriculture as caring-practice. Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickert. 2009. The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  72. Wiltshire, R. 1992. Environment and development: Grass roots women’s perspective. Barbados: DAWN.Google Scholar
  73. WCED—World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: OU Press.Google Scholar
  74. Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. New York: NY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Diversity, Nature, Gender and Sustainability (diversu) e.V.LüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability ResearchLeuphana University LüneburgLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations