Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 389–401 | Cite as

Cultivating values: environmental values and sense of place as correlates of sustainable agricultural practices

Article

Abstract

To assess whether and how environmental values and sense of place relate to sustainable farming practices, we conducted a study in South Kona, Hawaii, addressing environmental values, sense of place, and farm sustainability in five categories: environmental health, community engagement and food security, culture and history, education and research, and economics. We found that the sense of place and environmental values indexes showed significant correlation to each category of sustainability in both independent linear regressions and multivariate regression. In total, sense of place explained a larger share of the overall farm performance. However, each indicator showed relative strengths; environmental values showed significantly higher correlation to environmental and educational practices. Furthermore the scales were complimentary, and the use of both scales greatly improved prediction of good farming practices from a multiple-impact perspective. With implications for community and environmental impacts, results suggest that a more comprehensive view of farmers’ environmental values and place connections may help illuminate individual farmers’ decisions and sustainability-related practices.

Keywords

Environmental values Farming practices Hawaii New ecological paradigm Sense of place 

Abbreviation

NEP

New ecological paradigm

Supplementary material

10460_2015_9613_MOESM1_ESM.doc (63 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 63 kb)

References

  1. Abaidoo, S., and H. Dickinson. 2002. Alternative and conventional agricultural paradigms: evidence from farming in southwest Saskatchewan. Rural Sociology 67(1): 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahnström, J., J. Höckert, H.L. Bergeå, C.A. Francis, P. Skelton, and L. Hallgren. 2008. Farmers and nature conservation: what is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(1): 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, M.S. 2001. Gardens of Lono: archaeological investigations at the Amy BH Greenwell Ethnobotanical Garden, Kealakekua, Hawai‘i. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Altman, I., and S.M. Low. 1992. Place Attachment. In Place attachment, ed. I. Altman, and S.M. Low, 1–12. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arcury, T.A. 1990. Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization 49(4): 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardoin, N.M. 2006. Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: lessons for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 11: 112–126.Google Scholar
  7. Ardoin, N.M., J.S. Schuh, and R.K. Gould. 2012. Exploring the dimensions of place: a confirmatory factor analysis of data from three ecoregional sites. Environmental Education Research 18(5): 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beus, C.E., and R.E. Dunlap. 1994. Agricultural paradigms and the practice of agriculture. Rural Sociology 59(4): 620–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, A.S., L.E. Kruger, and S.E. Daniels. 2003. “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR). 2006. Towards sustainable agriculture: a guide for Hawai‘i’s farmers. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cordano, M., S.A. Welcomer, and R.F. Scherer. 2010. An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education 34(3): 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darnhofer, I., W. Schneeberger, and B. Freyer. 2005. Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: farmer types and their rationale. Agriculture and Human Values 22(1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. deGroot, J.I.M., and L. Steg. 2008. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 40(3): 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Department of Agriculture (DOA). 2007. Inshipment trend and its implications on Hawaii’s food security. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT). 2013. The State of Hawai‘i data book: a statistical abstract. http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/. Accessed 13 August 2013.
  16. Dietz, T., A. Fitzgerald, and R. Shwom. 2005. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30(1): 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz, T., P.C. Stern, and G.A. Guagnano. 1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30(4): 450–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlap, R.E. 2010. The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education 40(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlap, R.E., K.D. Van Liere, A.G. Mertig, and R.E. Jones. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egri, C.P. 1999. Attitudes, backgrounds and information preferences of Canadian organic and conventional farmers: implications for organic farming advocacy and extension. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 13(3): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fairhead, J., and I. Scoones. 2005. Local knowledge and the social shaping of soil investments: critical perspectives on the assessment of soil degradation in Africa. Land Use Policy 22: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fairweather, J.R., and H.R. Campbell. 2003. Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers: contrasting pathways to sustainability. Agriculture and Human Values 20: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garvill, J., T. Laitila, and M. Brydsten. 1994. Livsvärden och val av färdmedel [Life values and choice of mode of transportation]. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Transportation Research Unit.Google Scholar
  24. Gooch, M. 2002. A sense of place: ecological identity as a driver for catchment volunteering. Australian Journal on Volunteering 8(2): 23–32.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, R.K., N.M. Ardoin, and J.K. Hashimoto. 2010. Mālama the ‘āina, mālama the people on the ‘āina: the reaction to Avatar in Hawaii. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 4(4): 425–456.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, R.K., N.M. Ardoin, U. Woodside, T. Satterfield, N. Hannahs, and G.C. Daily. 2014. The forest has a story: cultural ecosystem services in Kona, Hawai‘i. Ecology and Society 19(3): 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grendstad, G. 2007. The new ecological paradigm scale: examination and scale analysis. Environmental Politics 8(4): 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groth, T.M., A. Curtis, E. Mendham, and E. Toman. 2014. Farmer identity in multifunctional landscapes: using a collective identity construct to explore the nature and impact of occupational identity. Australian Geographer 45(1): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halberg, N., G. Verschuur, and G. Goodlass. 2005. Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting for European farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105(1–2): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, J.W. 1996. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems 50(2): 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawcroft, L.J., and T.L. Milfont. 2010. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(2): 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurni, H. 2000. Assessing sustainable land management (SLM). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 81(2): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, C.Y., J.M. Bowker, and H.K. Cordell. 2004. Ethnic variation in environmental belief and behavior: an examination of the new ecological paradigm in a social psychological context. Environment and Behavior 36(2): 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jorgensen, B.S., and R.C. Stedman. 2001. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kabii, T., and P. Horwitz. 2006. A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environmental Conservation 33(1): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaltenborn, B.P. 1998. Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts. Applied Geography 18(2): 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaltoft, P. 1999. Values about nature in organic farming practice and knowledge. Sociologia Ruralis 39(1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kamehameha Schools Land Assets Division (KS-LAD). 2009. Strategic agricultural plan. Honolulu, HI: Kamehameha Schools Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kamakau, D. 1961. Ruling chiefs of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
  40. Karp, D.G. 1996. Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 28(1): 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kellert, S.R. 1998. A national study of outdoor wilderness experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  42. Lefroy, R.D.B., H.D. Bechstedt, and M. Rais. 2000. Indicators for sustainable land management based on farmer surveys in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 81(2): 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewicka, M. 2005. Ways to make people active: role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewicka, M. 2011. Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lincoln, N.K. 2014. Effect of various monotypic forest canopies on earthworm biomass and feral pig rooting in Hawaiian wet forests. Forest Ecology and Management 331: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lincoln, N.K., and T. Ladefoged. 2014. Agroecology of pre-contact Hawaiian dryland farming: the spatial extent, yield and social impact of Hawaiian breadfruit groves in Kona, Hawai‘i. Journal of Archaeological Science 49: 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lincoln, N.K., O.A. Chadwick, and P.M. Vitousek. 2014. Patterns of soil fertility and opportunities for precontact agriculture in Kona, Hawaii. Ecosphere 5: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lincoln, N.K. and N.M. Ardoin. In press. Farmer typology in South Kona, Hawai‘i: who is farming how and why. Food, Culture, and Society.Google Scholar
  49. Lincoln, N.K. and P.M., Vitousek. In press. Nitrogen fixation during decomposition of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) is an important contribution to nutrient supply in traditional dryland agricultural systems of Hawai’i. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability.Google Scholar
  50. Luo, Y., and J. Deng. 2008. The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. Journal of Travel Research 46(4): 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mallery, P., and D. George. 2010. SPSS for Windows: step by step (17.0 update). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  52. Maybery, D., L. Crase, and C. Gullifer. 2005. Categorizing farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCann, E., S. Sullivan, D. Erickson, and R. De Young. 1997. Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management 21(5): 747–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meeus, W., J. Iedema, M. Helsen, and W. Vollebergh. 1999. Patterns of adolescent identity development: review of literature and longitudinal analysis. Developmental Review 19(4): 419–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michel-Guillou, E., and G. Moser. 2006. Commitment of farmers to environmental protection: from social pressure to environmental conscience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(3): 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. National Agricultural Statistics Service Hawaii Field Office (NASS). 2009. Hawaii coffee. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii State Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  57. Nordlund, A.M., and J. Garvill. 2002. Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 34(6): 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Page, C., L. Bony, and L. Schewel. 2007. Island of Hawaii whole system project phase I report. Boulder, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.Google Scholar
  59. Patterson, M.E., and D.R. Williams. 2005. Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(4): 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Payraudeau, S., and H.M.G. Van der Werf. 2005. Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 107(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rasul, G., and G.B. Thapa. 2004. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: an assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems 79(3): 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reimer, A.P., A.W. Thompson, and L.S. Prokopy. 2012. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values 29(1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ryan, R.L., D.L. Erickson, and R.D. Young. 2010. Farmers’ motivations for adopting conservation practices along riparian zones in a mid-western agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryden, K.C. 1993. Mapping the invisible landscape: folklore, writing and sense of place. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  66. Santos, J.R.A. 1999. Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension 37(2): 1–5.Google Scholar
  67. Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2010a. Defining place attachment: a tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2010b. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(3): 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoon, B., and R. Te Grotenhuis. 2000. Values of farmers, sustainability and agricultural policy. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics 12: 17–27.Google Scholar
  70. Schultz, P.W. 2001. The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4): 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1987. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3): 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1990. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(5): 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smit, B., and J. Smithers. 1993. Sustainable agriculture: interpretations, analyses and prospects. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 3: 499–524.Google Scholar
  75. Stedman, R.C. 2002. Toward a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior 34(5): 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stedman, R.C. 2011. Is it really just a social construction: the contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16: 671–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stern, P.C. 2000a. Psychology and the science of human–environment interactions. American Psychologist 55(5): 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stern, P.C. 2000b. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G.A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology 6(2): 81–95.Google Scholar
  80. Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, and L. Kalof. 1993. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25: 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stern, P.C., L. Kalof, T. Dietz, and G.A. Guagnano. 1995. Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Psychology 25(18): 1611–1636.Google Scholar
  82. Sullivan, S., E. McCann, R. De Young, and D. Erickson. 1996. Farmers’ attitudes about farming and the environment: a survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9(2): 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. The Kohala Center. 2010. The 2010 county of Hawai‘i agricultural development plan. Kamuela, HI: Research and Development Department.Google Scholar
  84. Trentleman, C.K. 2009. Place attachment and community attachment: a primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and Natural Resources 22: 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. US Census. 2010. The 2010 US census. http://www.census.gov. Accessed 12 June 2013.
  86. Uzzell, D., E. Pol, and D. Badenas. 2002. Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior 34(1): 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Van Cauwenbergh, N., K. Biala, C. Bielders, V. Brouckaert, L. Franchois, V. Garcia Cidad, and A. Peeters. 2007. SAFE—a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 120(2–4): 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van der Werf, H.M., and J. Petit. 2002. Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 93(1–3): 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van Vugt, M., and C.D. Samuelson. 1998. The impact of personal metering in the management of a natural resource crisis: a social dilemma analysis. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 731–745.Google Scholar
  90. Vaske, J.J., and K.C. Kobrin. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 32(4): 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vogel, S. 1996. Farmers’ environmental attitudes and behavior: a case study for Austria. Environment and Behavior 28(5): 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Webster, J.P.G. 1997. Assessing the economic consequences of sustainability in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 64: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Williams, D.R., and J.J. Vaske. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49(6): 830–840.Google Scholar
  94. Williams, D.R., C.D. McDonald, C. Riden, and M. Uysal. 1995. Community attachment, regional identity, and resident attitudes towards tourism. 26th annual travel and tourism research association conference, June 10–14, 1995, in Acapulco, Mexico.Google Scholar
  95. Willock, J., I.J. Deary, M.M. McGregor, A. Sutherland, G. Edwards-Jones, O. Morgan, and E. Austin. 1999. Farmers’ attitudes, objectives, behaviors, and personality traits: the Edinburgh study of decision making on farms. Journal of Vocational Behavior 54(1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Worster, A.M., and E. Abrams. 2005. Sense of place among New England commercial fishermen and organic farmers: Implications for socially constructed environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education 11(5): 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wulfhorst, J.D., N. Rimbey, and T. Darden. 2006. Sharing the rangelands, competing for sense of place. American Behavioral Scientist 50(2): 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Tropical Plant and Soil SciencesUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.School of Education and Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations