Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 551–563 | Cite as

Moving from “matters of fact” to “matters of concern” in order to grow economic food futures in the Anthropocene

  • Ann HillEmail author


Agrifood scholars commonly adopt “a matter of fact way of speaking” to talk about the extent of neoliberal rollout in the food sector and the viability of “alternatives” to capitalist food initiatives. Over the past few decades this matter of fact stance has resulted in heated debate in agrifood scholarship on two distinct battlegrounds namely, the corporate food regime and the alternative food regime. In this paper I identify some of the limitations of speaking in a matter of fact way and of focusing on capitalist and neoliberal economies as the yardstick by which to assess all food economy initiatives. Using stories of bananas in Australia and the Philippines I advocate for a new mode of critical inquiry in food scholarship that focuses on matters of concern. Following Bruno Latour I use the term critical inquiry to refer to research methods and thinking practices that multiply possible ways of being and acting in the world. The new mode of critical inquiry I propose centers on enacting three broad research matters of concern. These are (1) gathering and assembling economic diversity (2) human actancy and (3) nonhuman actancy. I argue that through becoming critical minds in the Latourian sense researchers can play a key role in enacting economic food futures in the Anthropocene.


AFNs Alternative Anthropocene Bananas Community food economies Diverse economies Food regimes Latourian Post-capitalist food economies 



Alternative food network


Alter Trade Corporation


Community-supported agriculture



I would like to acknowledge the invaluable theoretical work of the Community Economies Collective that underpins this paper. Special thanks to Sarah Yallop, Gerda Roelvink, and Katherine Gibson for feedback on earlier drafts. Thanks also to the journal reviewers for their positive feedback and to Bob Fagan for the inspiration to follow bananas.


  1. Alter Trade. 2013. Vision and mission. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.
  2. Anderson, B. 2012. Banana farmers still standing after Yasi. Accessed 19 Sep 2012.
  3. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). 2011. Fact sheet—Biosecurity policy determination for bananas. Accessed 12 June 2013.
  4. Cameron, J., and J. Gerrard. 2008. Thinking and practicing values: Community enterprises in the food sector. Accessed 20 Sep 2012.
  5. Cameron, J., and R. Gordon. 2010. Building sustainable and ethical food futures through economic diversity: options for a mid-sized city. Accessed 20 Mar 2011.
  6. Cameron, J., C. Manhood, and J. Pomfrett. 2011. Bodily learning for a (climate) changing world: Registering differences through performative and collective research. Local Environment 16(6): 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, J., K. Gibson, and A. Hill. 2014. Cultivating hybrid collectives: research methods for enacting community food economies in Australia and the Philippines. Local Environment The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 19(1): 118–132.Google Scholar
  8. Crutzen, P.J., and E.F. Stoermer. 2000. The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.Google Scholar
  9. De Leon, T., and G.M. Escobido. 2004. The banana export industry and agrarian reform. Davao City: Alternative Forum for Research.Google Scholar
  10. De Puis, M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go “home” to eat?: Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Saussure, F. 1966. Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. DeLind, L. 2002. Place, work, and civic agriculture: common fields for cultivation. Agriculture and Human Values 19(3): 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLind, L. 2011. Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28(2): 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dibden, J., C. Potter, and C. Cocklin. 2009. Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fagan, R. 2005. Globalization, the WTO, and the Australia–Philippines “banana war”. In Cross-continental food chains, ed. N. Fold, and B. Pritchard, 207–222. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fagan, R. 2006. “Bananas in chains”? Reflections on global commodity chains and labor movement regulatory initiatives. Employment Relations Record 6(2): 31–46.Google Scholar
  17. Feagan, R. 2007. The place of food: Mapping out the “local” in local food systems. Progress in Human Geography 31(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Follow The Things. 2013. Follow the things. Accessed 13 Aug 2013.
  19. Gibson, K., A. Hill, P. Maclay, and M. Villalba. 2009. Building social enterprises in the Philippines: Strategies for local development. Accessed 18 Jan 2012.
  20. Gibson, K., and A. Hill. 2010. Community partnering for local development. Accessed 18 Jan 2012.
  21. Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2000. Poststructural interventions. In A companion to economic geography, ed. E. Sheppard, and T. Barnes, 95–110. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2008. Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds”. Progress in Human Geography 32(5): 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson-Graham, J.K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take back the economy: An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, D., and M. Goodman. 2009. Alternative food networks. In International encyclopedia of human geography (Volume 3), ed. R. Kitchen, and N. Thrift, 208–220. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray, S., and R. Le Heron. 2010. Globalizing New Zealand: Fonterra co-operative group and shaping the future. New Zealand Geographer 66: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guthman, J. 2008a. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39: 1171–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guthman, J. 2008b. Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy. Geoforum 39: 1241–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, E. 2009. Neoliberal subjectivities or a politics of the possible? Reading for difference in alternative food networks. Area 41(1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Healy, S. 2009. Economics, alternative. In International encyclopedia of human geography (Volume 3), ed. R. Kitchen, and N. Thrift, 338–344. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, A. 2013. Growing community food economies in the Philippines—The PhD thesis. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  32. Holloway, L., M. Kneafsey, L. Venn, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Toumainen. 2007. Possible food economies: A methodological framework for exploring food production–consumption relationships. Sociologia Ruralis 47: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarosz, L. 2000. Understanding agri-food networks as social relations. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knowledge @ Australian School of Business. 2011. The price of trade protectionism: Yes, we have no bananas! Accessed 20 Sep 2012.
  35. Koutsoukis, J. 2006. No bananas for nine months. Accessed 20 Sep 2012.
  36. Krinks, P. 2002. The economy of the Philippines: Elites, inequalities, and economic restructuring. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Latour, B. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Latour, B. 2013. An investigation into the modes of existence: An anthropology of the modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Law, J., and J. Urry. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society 33(3): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawrence, G., C. Richards, and K. Lyons. 2013. Food security in Australia in an era of neoliberalism, productivism, and climate change. The Journal of Rural Studies 29: 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Le Heron, R., and N. Lewis. 2009. Discussion. Theorizing food regimes: Intervention as politics. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marsden, T., J. Banks, and G. Bristow. 2000. Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maye, D., L. Holloway, and M. Kneafsey (eds.). 2007. Alternative food geographies: Representation and practice. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  44. Maye, D., J. Dibden, V. Higgins, and C. Potter. 2012. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: Comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A 44: 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McMichael, P. 2005. Global development and the corporate food regime. In New directions in the sociology of global development, ed. F. Buttel, and P. McMichael, 265–299. Oxford: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  46. McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime analysis of the “world food crisis”. Agriculture and Human Values 26(4): 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, S. 2008. Edible action: Food activism and alternative economics. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Morgan, K., T. Marsden, and J. Murdoch. 2008. Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nancy, J.-L. 2000. Being singular plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. O’Neill, P., and B. Fagan. 2006. Geographical takes on three decades of economic reform in Australia. Geographical Research 44(2): 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ombion, K. 2007. Alter trade corporation: From farm workers’ cooperative to profit-seeking company? Accessed 20 Sep.
  52. Puig De La Bellacasa, M. 2010. Ethical doings in nature cultures. Ethics Place and Environment 13(2): 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renting, H., T. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35: 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robbins, P., M. Emery, and J. Rice. 2008. Gathering in Thoreau’s backyard: Non-timber forest product harvesting as practice. Area 40(2): 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roelvink, G., and M. Zolkos. 2011. Climate change as experience of affect. Angelaki Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 16(4): 43–57.Google Scholar
  56. Sage, C. 2003. Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative “good food” networks in south–west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Venn, L., M. Kneafsey, L. Holloway, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Tuomainen. 2006. Researching European alternative food networks: Some methodological considerations. Area 38(3): 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watts, D., B. Ilbery, and D. Maye. 2005. Making reconnections in agro-food geography: Alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography 29(1): 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whatmore, S., P. Stassart, and H. Renting. 2003. What’s alternative about alternative food networks? Environment and Planning A 35: 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright, S. 2010. Cultivating beyond capitalist economies. Economic Geography 86(3): 297–318.Google Scholar
  61. YouTube. 2010. Banana splits. Accessed 29 Sep 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations