Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 119–120 | Cite as

Introduction to the symposium: Towards cross-cultural views on Community Supported Agriculture

  • J. Lagane
Article

Introduction

Abundant discourses and literature exist about the necessity to develop food system initiatives related to transition to sustainability. Alternative food network studies (Hinrichs 2000; Roep and Wiskerke 2006; Brunori 2007) show links with food citizenship (Renting et al. 2012), transition theory (Brunori et al. 2012) and ethical consumerism. The Aalborg Charter of Europeans cities and towns stands as an example of the intricate link between sustainable political orientation and food control. Though two decades have passed since its adoption, the charter, when revised in 2004 (it therefore became known as Aalborg +10Charter), recalled the necessity for European municipalities to endorse the commitment “to improve soil quality, preserve ecologically productive land and promote sustainable agriculture and forestry”.1

Moreover, it has become clear to both social scientists and the general public that the food industry tends to take a prominent place in household expenditures...

Keywords

Alternative Food Local Food System Responsible Consumption Alternative Food Network Civic Agriculture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brunori, G. 2007. Local food and alternative food networks: A communication perspective. Anthropology of food. http://aof.revues.org/430. Accessed 13 Sep 2013.
  2. Brunori, G., A. Rossi, and F. Guidi. 2012. On the New Social Relations around and beyond Food. Analysing Consumers’ Role and Action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups). Sociologia Ruralis 52: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLind, L.B. 1999. Close encounters with a CSA: The reflections of a bruised and somewhat wiser anthropologist. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henderson, E., Community Supported Agriculture. 2003. Encyclopaedia of Community. SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781412952583.
  5. Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16(3): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holloway, L., M. Kneafsey, L. Venn, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Tuomainen. 2007. Possible food economics: A methodological framework for exploring food production–consumption relationships. Sociologia Ruralis 47(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lamine, C. 2005. Settling the shared uncertainties: Local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociologia Ruralis 45(4): 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press Markets. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  9. Piorr, A., and K. Müller (eds.). 2009. Rural landscapes and agricultural policies in Europe. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Renting, Henk, Markus, Schermer, and Ada Rossi. 2012. Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19(3): 289–307.Google Scholar
  11. Roep, D., and H. Wiskerke (eds.). 2006. Nourishing networks: Fourteen lessons about creating sustainable food supply chains. Doetinchem: Rural Sociology Group of Wageningen and Reed Business Information.Google Scholar
  12. Stagl, S. 2002. Local organic food markets: Potentials and limitations for contributing to sustainable development. Empirica 29(2): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire méditerranéen de sociologie (LAMES)Aix-Marseille UniversityAix-en-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations