Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 649–653 | Cite as

The problem with the farmer’s voice

Article

Abstract

In this essay we present three biases that make it difficult to represent farmer voices in a meaningful way. These biases are information bias, individual bias, and short-term bias. We illustrate these biases through two case studies. One is the case of Golden Rice in the Philippines and the other is the case of Bt cotton in India.

Keywords

Agriculture Indigenous knowledge Biotechnology 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. 1991. Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review 16(3): 586–612.Google Scholar
  2. Beckwith, J.A., T. Hadlock, and H. Suffron. 2003. Public perceptions of plant biotechnology: A focus group study. New Genetics and Society 22(2): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch. 1992. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy 100: 992–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, P. 2007. Mali’s farmers’ jury: an attempt to democratise policy-making on biotechnology. In Biotechnology Policy in Africa, ed. N.G. Clark, J. Mugabe, and J. Smith. African Centre of Technology Studies: Nairobi.Google Scholar
  5. Chong, M. 2003. Acceptance of golden rice in the Philippine ‘rice bowl’. Nature Biotechnology 21(9): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J.I., and R. Paarlberg. 2004. Unlocking crop biotechnology in developing countries—A Report from the field. World Development 32(9): 1563–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GRAIN. 2001. Apomixis: The plant breeder’s dream. Seedling Sept. :9–17.Google Scholar
  8. Gruère, G.P., and D. Sengupta. 2011. Bt cotton and farmer suicides: An evidence-based assessment. Journal of Development Studies 47(2): 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henrich, J. 2001. Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: Adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. American Anthropologist 103(4): 992–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herring, R J. 2008. Bt cotton: Why do so many smart people get it so wrong? The Hindu, 28 August.Google Scholar
  11. IRRI. 2013. Clarifying recent news about Golden Rice. Web posting, 21 Feb. http://irri.org/blogs/item/clarifying-recent-news-about-golden-rice.
  12. ISAAA. 2011. Farmers voice should be heard, Bt eggplant benefits at stake. Blog posting, 18 Feb. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=7394.
  13. James, C. 2013. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications).Google Scholar
  14. Kathage, J., and M. Qaim. 2012. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(29): 11652–11656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lalitha, N., Bharat Ramaswami, and P.K. Viswanathan. 2009.India’s experience with Bt Cotton: Case studies from Gujarat and Maharashtra. R. Tripp, ed. Pp. 135–167, Vol. Biotechnology and agricultural development: Transgenic cotton, rural institutions and resource-poor farmers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Pain, P. 2013. Battling India’s Monsanto Protection Act, Farmers demand end to GMO. Blog posting, 19 Aug. http://www.occupy.com/article/battling-indias-monsanto-protection-act-farmers-demand-end-gmo.
  17. Patel, N., et al. 2010. Avaaj Otalo—A Field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India. In CHI 2010 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Pimbert, M.P., and T. Wakeford. 2002. Prajateerpu: A citizens jury/scenario workshop on food and farming futures for Andhra Pradesh, India. London and Sussex: IIED and IDS.Google Scholar
  19. Qaim, M., and D. Zilberman. 2003. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299: 900–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramaswami, B., C.E. Pray, and N. Lalitha. 2012. The spread of illegal transgenic cotton varieties in India: Biosafety regulation, monopoly, and enforcement. World Development 40(1): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnurr, M.A., and S. Mugabi-Muguzi. This issue. ‘No one asks for a meal they’ve never eaten;’ Or, do African farmers want Genetically Modified crops? Agriculture and Human Values forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Selva, Meera. 2006. Mali farmers reject GM crops as attack on their way of life. The Independent, 31 Jan. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/mali-farmers-reject-gm-crops-as-attack-on-their-way-of-life-525259.html.
  23. Shiva, V. 2012. Women farmers want non-GM heirloom seeds for food security India. Womens News Network, 17 July. http://womennewsnetwork.net/2012/07/17/india-women-farmers-seeds-food-security/.
  24. Soleri, D., and D.A. Cleveland. 2001. Farmers’ genetic perceptions regarding their crop populations: An example with maize in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Economic Botany 55: 106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soleri, D., et al. 2008. Testing assumptions underlying economic research on transgenic food crops for Third World farmers: Evidence from Cuba, Guatemala and Mexico. Ecological Economics 67: 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, G.D. 2002. Biotechnology and suicide in India. Anthropology News 46(5).Google Scholar
  27. Stone, G.D. 2004. Social constraints on crop biotechnology in developing countries. AgBioForum 7(1&2): 76–79.Google Scholar
  28. Stone, G.D. 2007. Agricultural deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology 48: 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stone, G.D. 2011. Field versus farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields, and larger questions. World Development 39(3): 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stone, G.D. 2012. Constructing facts: Bt cotton narratives in India. Economic and Political Weekly 47(38): 62–70.Google Scholar
  31. Stone, G.D., A. Flachs, and C. Diepenbrock. 2014. Rhythms of the herd: Long term dynamics in seed choice by Indian farmers. Technology in Society 36: 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang, G., et al. 2012. b-Carotene in Golden Rice is as good as b-carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 96: 658–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vasavi, A.R. 2012. Shadow space: Suicides and the Predicament of Rural India. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.Google Scholar
  34. Yap, D.J. 2013. Environmentalists, farmers’ groups raise alarm on ‘Golden Rice.’ Philippine Daily Inquirer, 3 Sept. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/480423/environmentalists-farmers-groups-raise-alarm-on-genetically-modified-golden-rice.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations