Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 121–132 | Cite as

From “Food from Nowhere” to “Food from Here:” changing producer–consumer relations in Austria

Article

Abstract

The notion of a “third food regime” implies simultaneous processes of further global concentration and integration and at the same time resistance through new emerging producer–consumer relations. This paper examines these processes by looking at Austria over the last 30 years. While direct producer–consumer cooperatives established at an early point, today forms of community supported agriculture (CSA) are rare. This paper explains this by identifying a shift of the entire food system from “food from nowhere” to “food from here.” The account follows the early emergence of alternative food networks through the political appeal to consumer patriotism in connection with Austria joining the EU, to a sustained positioning of retail chains with regional and national food products. The paper argues that this satisfies the needs of a large proportion of consumers and discourages the emergence of new food initiatives. The paper follows the development of different approaches and their transformations until today. Thus a picture evolves of changing, and partly progressing consumer–producer relations in response to wider societal and political transformation processes. The results explain why the movement towards CSA is currently weak in Austria, but demonstrate at the same time how alternative food networks may contribute to a transformation of the food system.

Keywords

Food regime Consumer–producer relations Austria Agri-food system Civic food networks 

Abbreviations

AMAP

Association de maintien de l’agriculture paysanne (Association in support of smallholder Agriculture)

AMA

Agricultural marketing board of Austria

BMLFUW

Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Umwelt und Wasserschutz (Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture)

BSE

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy

CAP

Common Agricultural Policy

CSA

Community supported agriculture

EU

European Union

OeAR

Österreichische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für eigenständige Regionalentwicklung (Austrian Association for Endogenous Development)

OeBV

Österreichische Bergbauernvereinigung (Austrian Hill Farmers Association)

References

  1. Alber, J., and U. Kohler. 2008. Informal food production in the enlarged European Union. Social Indicators Research 89: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvay, C. 2012. Der große Bioschmäh. Vienna, AT: Carl Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
  3. AMA. 2014. RollAMA Total/Bio. http://www.ama-marketing.at/home/groups/7/Marktentwicklung_bio.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  4. Bio Austria. 2012(a). Infoportal der Biobäuerinnen und BiobauernÖsterreich. http://www.bio-austria.at/startseite/statistik. Accessed 10 May 2014.
  5. Bio Austria. 2012(b). Zum Buch „Der große Bio-Schmäh“. http://www.bio-austria.at/biobauern/aktuell/oesterreichweit__1/zum_buch_der_grosse_bio_schmaeh. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  6. BMLFUW. 2010. Lebensmittelbericht Österreich 2010. Vienna: BMLFUW. http://www.lebensministerium.at/lebensmittel/lebensmittelbericht/lebensmittelbericht.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2013.
  7. BMLFUW. 2012. Das österreichische Lebensmittelmodell. http://www.lebensministerium.at/lebensmittel/qs-lebensmittel/lebensmittelpolitik-oe/lebensmittelmodell.html. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  8. Brunori, G., A. Rossi, and V. Malandrin. 2011. Co-producing transition: Innovation processes in farms adhering to Solidarity Purchase Groups (SGPs) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 18(1): 28–53.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman. 1997. From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2005. Supermarket own brands supply chains and the transformation of the agri-food system. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 13(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  11. Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2007. Supermarket own brands, new foods and the reconfiguration of agri-food supply chains. In Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods, ed. D. Burch, and G. Lawrence, 100–128. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2009. Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, H., and R. Le Heron. 2007. Supermarkets, producers and audit technologies: The constitutive micro-politics of food, legitimacy and governance. In Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods, ed. D. Burch, and G. Lawrence, 131–153. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, H. 2009. Breaking new ground in food regime theory: Corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the ‘food from somewhere’ regime? Agriculture and Human Values 26: 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colombo, L. 2013. The GAS as laboratories of civil economy. http://www.aiccon.it/ricerca_scheda.cfm?wid=297&archivio=C. Accessed 28 July 2014.
  16. Darnhofer, I., T. Lindenthal, R. Bartel-Kratochvil, and W. Zollitsch. 2010. Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30(1): 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedmann, H. 1987. International regimes of food and agriculture since 1870. In Peasants and peasant societies, ed. T. Shanin, 258–276. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Friedmann, H. 2005. From colonialism to green capitalism: Social movements and the emergence of food regimes. In New directions in the sociology of global development: Research in rural sociology and development, vol. 11, ed. F. Buttel, and P. McMichael, 227–264. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: the rise and fall of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29(2): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedmann, H., and A. McNair. 2008. Whose rules rule? Contested projects to certify ‘local production for distant consumers’. Journal of Agrarian Change 8(2 & 3): 408–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genussregion Österreich n.d. Vision und Mission. http://www.genuss-region.at/initiative/vision-und-mission.html. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  22. Groier, M., and N. Gleirscher. 2005. Bio-Landbau in Österreich im internationalen Kontext Forschungsbericht 54. Vienna, AT: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.Google Scholar
  23. Gutes vom Bauernhof n.d. Gutes vom Bauernhofdie Profis unter den Direktvermarktern. http://www.gutesvombauernhof.at/oesterreich/gutes-vom-bauernhof.html#content_top. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  24. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hamm, U., and F. Groneveld. 2004. The European market for organic food: Revised and updated analysis. Aberystwith: School of Management and Business.Google Scholar
  26. Holt, G., and V. Amelien. 2007. Introduction: From local food to localized food. Anthropology of Food (2). http://aof.revues.org/405. Accessed 28 Jan 2013.
  27. Hoppichler, J. 2007. Was brachte der EU-Beitritt der österreichischen Landwirtschaft? Facts & Features 39. Vienna, AT: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.Google Scholar
  28. Hovorka, G. 1999. Das Förderungssystem in der österreichischen Landwirtschaft in Landwirtschaft und Agrarpolitik in den 90er Jahren. Österreichische Gesellschaft für kritische Geografie (ÖGKG). Vienna, AT: Promedia-Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Jaklin, U. 2013. Kleinbäuer*innen und die Foodcoop D’Speis (Wien). Gründe für die Teilnahme an einem alternativen Lebensmittelnetzwerk. Unpublished diploma thesis, University Vienna. http://foodcoops.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/DA_JAKLIN_final_02.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
  30. Krammer, J., and G. Scheer. 1978. Das österreichische Agrarsystem. Vienna, AT: BMLF.Google Scholar
  31. Kurzmann, D., and P. Sitzwohl. 1985. Lebenszeichen—Initiativen aus dem Waldviertel. Gföhl, AT: Waldviertler Bildungs und Wirtschaftinitiative.Google Scholar
  32. Lamine, C., H. Renting, A. Rossi, J. Wiskerke, and G. Brunori. 2012. Agri-food systems and territorial development: Innovations: New dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. In Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic, ed. I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, and B. Dedieu, 227–255. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Legner, M. 2013. Positionierung und Vernetzung der FoodcoopsUntersuchung eines alternativen Raums. Unpublished bachelor thesis, University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
  34. Lenz, E. 2011. Dierktvermarktung neu orientieren Landwirtschaftskammer Österreich press release. http://www.lko.at/?id=2500%2C1629056%2C%2C. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  35. Little, R., D. Maye, and B. Ilbery. 2010. Collective purchasing: Moving local and organic foods beyond the niche market. Environment and Planning A 42(8): 1797–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madreiter, M. 1995. Eingangsvoraussetzungen für ein zentrenspezifisches Agrarmarketingkonzept; Ergebnisse einer kontingenz- und clusteranalytischen Untersuchung am Beispiel der Bauernmärkte in Österreich. Vienna, AT: Unpublished Diploma Thesis. Universität für Bodenkultur.Google Scholar
  37. Matscher, A., and M. Schermer. 2010. Zusatznutzen Berg Argumente für den Konsum von Bergprodukten. Agrarwirtschaft 58(2): 125–134.Google Scholar
  38. McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meadows, D.H., D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  40. MIRAMAP n.d. Mouvement inter-regional des AMAP. http://miramap.org/-Les-AMAP-.html. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  41. Moore, O. 2006. What farmers’ markets say about the post-organic movement in Ireland. In Sociological perspectives of organic agriculture—from pioneer to practice, ed. Georgina Holt, and Matthew Reed, 18–36. Wallingford: Cabi International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. NETs.werk. 2013. Geschichte. http://netswerk.at/index.php/team-steyr-2/geschichte/. Accessed 12 March 2014.
  43. Nielsen. 2008. The environment#1 corporate priorityaccording to the world’s consumers. Breakingnews, October. http://at.nielsen.com/pubs/documents/CSR_Global_BN.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.
  44. OeAR. 2009. Impulse newsletter 01_2009. http://oearat.web06.vss.kapper.net/wp-content/uploads/Impulse_2009.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  45. OEKONSULT. 2012. Lieber aus der Region. http://www.oekonsult.eu/regional-essen-mailfile.pdf. Accessed on 22 Aug 2013.
  46. Pechlaner, G., and G. Otero. 2008. The third food regime: Neoliberal globalism and agricultural biotechnology in North America. Sociologia Ruralis 48(4): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Petrovics, S., N. Chioncel, S. Karner, and I. Salzer. 2010. Organic plus—(re)politisation of the food sector? Reflections on two case studies. In Building sustainable rural futures proceedings of the 9th European IFSA symposium, 4–7 July 2010, eds. I. Darnhofer and M. Grötzer, 1783–1792. Vienna, AT: http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2010/2010_WS4.3_Petrovics.pdf. Assessed 20 Feb 2012.
  48. Priebe, H. 1985. Die subventionierte Unvernunft. Berlin, DE: Siedler.Google Scholar
  49. Raith, D., and B. Ungericht. 2011. Nachhaltigkeit und CSR im österreichischen Lebensmitteleinzelhandel Endbericht. http://uni-graz.at/fswecsr/nahaleh/nahaleh_endbericht.pdf. Acessed 22 Aug 2013.
  50. Renting, H., M. Schermer, and A. Rossi. 2012. Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19(3): 289–307.Google Scholar
  51. Riegler, J. 1988. Zielsetzungen für die österreichische Landwirtschaft. In Chance Landwirtschaft—Wege und Perspektiven für die neunziger Jahre, ed. F. Schneider, and M. Hofreiter, 319–331. Vienna, AT: Österreichischer Agrarverlag.Google Scholar
  52. Rohrmoser, A. 2004. Gemeinwesenarbeit und eigenständige Regionalentwicklung. In GemeinWesenArbeit im ländlichen Raum, ed. A. Rohrmoser, 35–68. Innsbruck/Wien, AT: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Sassatelli, R., and A. Scott. 2001. Novel food, new markets and trust regimes, responses to the erosion of consumers’ confidence in Austria, Italy and the UK. European Societies 3(2): 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schermer, M. 2008a. Organic policy in Austria: Greening and greenwashing. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7(1/2): 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schermer, M. 2008b. The decline of farmers direct marketing in Austria: Consequences and counter strategies. In Empowerment of rural actors: A renewal of farming systems perspectives, Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA symposium 6–10, July 2008, ed. B. Dedieu, and S. Zasser-Bedoya, 211–220. Clermont Ferrand, FR: INRA SAD.Google Scholar
  56. Schermer, M. 2011. Consumer engagement in the food chain: Of pro-sumers, co-sumers and no-sumers. Paper presented at the XXIV ESRS Congress 22–25 August 2011, Chania, Greece.Google Scholar
  57. Tregear, A. 2011. Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 27(4): 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Willer, H., and J. Lernoud eds. 2014. The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2014. FIBL-IFOAM Report. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (Fibl) Frick and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1636-organic-world-2014.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2014.
  59. Winter, M. 2003. Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. World Commission on Environment and Development (ed.). 1987. Our common future. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wright, E.O. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. Zoklits, M. 1990. Das Brot der Pessimisten. Forschungsbericht Nr.25. Vienna, AT: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mountain Agriculture Research Unit, Department of SociologyUniverstät InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations