Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 47–61 | Cite as

Independence and individualism: conflated values in farmer cooperation?

Article

Abstract

Social scientists have long examined the changing role of the individual, and the influence of individualism in social and economic arrangements as well as behavioral decisions. With respect to co-operative behavior among farmers, however, the ideology of individualism has been little theorized in terms of its relationship to the longstanding virtue of independence. This paper explores this relationship by combining analysis of historical literature on the agricultural cooperative movement with the accounts of contemporary English farmers. I show that the virtue of independence is deployed to justify a variety of cooperative (formal and informal) and non-cooperative practices and that, despite apparently alternative interpretations, independence is most often conflated with individualistic premises. That conflation, I argue, leads farmers to see their neighbors as natural competitors: as those from whom which independence must be sought. This has the effect of masking the structural dependencies which farmers face (such as lenders and large purchasers) and limits the alternatives available to them to realize a view of independence that is maintained, rather than opposed, by interdependent collective action. Thus perceived, individualism is an ideological doctrine that succeeds by appealing to the virtue of independence, while simultaneously denying its actual realization.

Keywords

Independence Farmers Individualism Cooperation Autonomy Anthropology 

References

  1. Bauman, Z. 2001. Foreword: individually together. In Individualization, ed. U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim, xiv–xix. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beal, G.M. 1954. The roots of participation in farmer cooperatives. Ames, IA: College Book Store.Google Scholar
  3. Blackstock, K., K. Brown, B. Davies, and P. Shannon. 2006. Individualism, cooperation, and conservation in Scottish farming communities. In Rural governance: International perspectives, ed. L. Cheshire, V. Higgins, and G. Lawrence, 191–207. Hoboken: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cogeca 2010. Agricultural co-operation in Europe—main issues and trends. In Agricultural co-operation in Europemain issues and trends. Brussels: Cogeca.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, A.P. 1994. Self-consciousness: An alternative anthropology of identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooperatives UK 2012. The UK co-operative economy 2012: Alternatives to austerity. In The UK co-operative economy 2012: Alternatives to austerity. Manchester: Cooperatives UK Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Desmarais, A.A. 2002. PEASANTS SPEAK—the Vía Campesina: consolidating an international peasant and farm movement. The Journal of Peasant Studies 29: 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumont, L. 1986. Essays on individualism: Modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Elias, N. 1991. The society of individuals. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Emery, S.B. 2010. In better fettle: Improvement, work, and rhetoric in the transition to environmental farming in the North York Moors. Doctoral thesis. Department of Anthropology, Durham University. Available from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/379/.
  11. Emery, S.B. 2014. Hard work, productivity, and the management of the farmed environment in anthropological perspective. In Contemporary issues in management, ed. L. Hamilton, L. Mitchell, and A. Mangan, 90–104. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Emery, S.B., and J.R. Franks. 2012. The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? Journal of Rural Studies 28: 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fearne, A. 1998. The evolution of partnerships in the meat supply chain: Insights from the British beef industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 3: 214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. 1976. The will to knowledge: History of sexuality: 1. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gasson, R. 1973. Goals and values of farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics 24: 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasson, R. 1977. Farmers’ participation in cooperative activities. Sociologia Ruralis 17: 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldschmidt, W. 1971. Independence as an element in pastoral social systems. Anthropological Quarterly 44: 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gröger, B.L. 1981. Of men and machines: Co-operation among French family farmers. Ethnology 20: 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Henrich, N., and J. Henrich. 2007. Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holstein, J.A., and J.F. Gubrium. 1995. The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ilbery, B.W. 1983. Goals and values of hop farmers. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 8: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawton, J., P. Brotherton, V. Brown, C. Elphick, A. Fitter, J. Forshaw, R. Haddow, S. Hilborne, R. Leafe, and G. Mace 2010. Making space for nature: A review of England’s wildlife sites and ecological network. Report to DEFRA.Google Scholar
  24. Lukes, S. 2006 [1973]. Individualism. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  25. Macfarlane, A. 1978. The origins of English individualism: Some surprises. Theory and Society 6: 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsden, T., R. Munton, S. Whatmore, and J. Little. 1986. Towards a political economy of capitalist agriculture: A British perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 10: 498–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsden, T., R. Munton, S. Whatmore, and J. Little. 1989. Strategies for coping in capitalist agriculture: An examination of the responses of farm families in British agriculture. Geoforum 20: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maxey, L. 2006. Can we sustain sustainable agriculture? Learning from small-scale producer-suppliers in Canada and the UK. The Geographical Journal 172: 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. May, D.E. 2012. Non-economic drivers influencing farmers’ incentives to cooperate: Do they remain robust through policy changes? Journal of Rural Cooperation 40: 217–238.Google Scholar
  30. May, D.E., and G.J. Tate. 2011. Exploring economic and social–psychological factors in explaining farmers’ willingness to participate in cooperative alliances. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances 2: 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKenzie, A.J., S.B. Emery, J.R. Franks, and M.J. Whittingham. 2013. FORUM: Landscape-scale conservation: Collaborative agri-environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate? Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 1274–1280.Google Scholar
  32. Morley, J. 1975. British agricultural cooperatives. London: Hutchinson Benham.Google Scholar
  33. Nielsen Farmers’ Panel. 1963. A Nielsen Farmers’ Panel study of cooperatives and buying groups. In Farmers’ Panel study of cooperatives and buying groups, ed. A. Nielsen. Oxford: Nielsen Farmers’ Panel Special Research Division.Google Scholar
  34. Niska, M., H.T. Vesala, and K.M. Vesala. 2012. Peasantry and entrepreneurship as frames for farming: reflections on farmers’ values and agricultural policy discourses. Sociologia Ruralis 52: 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pimbert, M.P. 2008. Towards food sovereignty: Reclaiming autonomous food systems. London: International institute for environment and development (IIED).Google Scholar
  36. Polanyi, K. 1945. Origins of our time: The great transformation. London: Victor Gallancz Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Pretty, J. 1991. Farmers’ extension practice and technology adaptation: Agricultural revolution in 17–19th century Britain. Agriculture and Human Values 8: 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rew, R.H. 1913. An agricultural faggot: A collection of papers on agricultural subjects. Westminster: P.S. King and Son.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riches, D. 2000. The holistic person; or, the ideology of egalitarianism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi, A.M., and C.C. Hinrichs. 2011. Hope and skepticism: Farmer and local community views on the socio-economic benefits of agricultural bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 1418–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sargent, M. 1982. Agricultural co-operation. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  42. Schneider, S., and P.A. Niederle. 2010. Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: The construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott, L. 1922. Preface. In Agricultural cooperation in England and Wales, ed. W.H. Warman. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  44. Siebert, R., M. Toogood, and A. Knierim. 2006. Factors affecting European farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis 46: 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, L.P.F. 1961. The evolution of agricultural co-operation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Spriggs, J., J. Hobbs, and A. Fearne. 2000. Beef producer attitudes to coordination and quality assurance in Canada and the UK. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stock, P.V., and J. Forney forthcoming. A theory of farmer autonomy: A comparison of Switzerland and New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies.Google Scholar
  48. Stofferahn, C. 2004. Individualism or cooperation: Preferences for sharing machinery and labor. Journal of Cooperatives 18: 1–17.Google Scholar
  49. Stofferahn, C.W. 2010. South Dakota soybean processors: The discourse of conversion from cooperative to limited liability corporation. Journal of Cooperatives 24: 13–43.Google Scholar
  50. Sullivan, S., E. McCann, R. De Young, and D. Erickson. 1996. Farmers’ attitudes about farming and the environment: A survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9: 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutherland, L.-A., and R.J.F. Burton. 2011. Good farmers, good neighbors? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis 51: 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van der Ploeg, J.D. 2008. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  53. Warman, W.H. 1922. Agricultural co-operation in England and Wales. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  54. Weber, M. 1930. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, R. 1973. The country and the city. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  56. Wittman, H., A.A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe. 2010. Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature, and community. Oxford: Pambazuka.Google Scholar
  57. Worsley, P. 1971. Two blades of grass: rural cooperatives in agricultural modernization. In Two blades of grass: Rural cooperatives in agricultural modernization. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations