Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 621–635 | Cite as

Transitions to agroecological farming systems in the Mississippi River Basin: toward an integrated socioecological analysis

Article

Abstract

Industrial agriculture has extensive environmental and social costs, and efforts to create alternative farming systems are widespread if not yet widely successful. This study explored how a set of grain farmers and rotational graziers in Iowa transitioned to agroecological management practices. Our focus on the resources and strategies that farmers mobilized to develop opportunities for, and overcome barriers to, transitioning to alternative practices allows us to go beyond the existing literature focused on why farmers transition. We attend to both the ecological and socioeconomic context of innovation by comparing processes of technical change in two contrasting regions of Iowa. Farmers cultivated farm-level biodiversity and enterprise diversity, developed new cognitive and psychological competencies, and overcame barriers to innovation by developing external network linkages with peers, knowledge organizations, and federal policies. Our research provides insights into how biophysical, cognitive, structural and market considerations can be integrated into research efforts that aim to make sense of innovation toward sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

Agroecology Competencies Innovation Iowa Resource-based view Sustainable transitions 

References

  1. Allaire, G., and S. Wolf. 2004. Cognitive representations and institutional hybridity in agrofood innovation. Science, Technology and Human Values 29: 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altieri, M., and C. Nicholls. 2008. Scaling up agroecological approaches for food sovereignty in Latin America. Development 51: 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araghi, F. 1995. Global depeasantization: 1945–1990. Sociological Quarterly 36: 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, M. 2004. Farming for us all: Practical agriculture & the cultivation of sustainability. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blesh, J., and L. Drinkwater. 2013. The impact of nitrogen source and crop rotation on nitrogen mass balances in the Mississippi River Basin. Ecological Applications 23: 1017–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boström, M., and M. Klintman. 2008. Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buttel, F.H., O. Larson, and G. Gillespie. 1990. The sociology of agriculture. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, H. 2009. Breaking new ground in food regime theory: Corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the ‘food from somewhere’ regime? Agriculture and Human Values 26: 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carolan, M.S. 2006. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agriculture and Human Values 23: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Centonze, A.L. 2010. Transitional cluster development: A case study from the New York wine industry. Economic Development Quarterly 24: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. 2003. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 249–291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Darnhofer, I., W. Schneeberger, and B. Freyer. 2005. Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: Farmer types and their rationale. Agriculture and Human Values 22: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David, M.B., L.E. Drinkwater, and G.F. McIsaac. 2010. Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Environmental Quality 39: 1657–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drinkwater, L.E., and S.S. Snapp. 2007. Nutrients in agroecosystems: Rethinking the management paradigm. Advances in Agronomy 92: 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EWG [Environmental Working Group]. 2013. Farm subsidy database. http://farm.ewg.org. Accessed 20 October 2013.
  17. EPA SAB [Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board]. 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: an update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-08-004. EPA, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  18. Fairweather, J.R. 1999. Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geels, F.W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geels, F.W. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glenna, L.L., and R.A. Jussaume. 2007. Organic and conventional Washington State farmers’ opinions on GM crops and marketing strategies. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22: 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gliessman, S.R. 2007. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glover, J.D., et al. 2010. Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328: 1638–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From farming to biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Greene, C., and A. Kremen. 2003. U.S. organic farming in 20002001. Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 780. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  26. Guthman, J. 2004. The trouble with ‘organic lite’ in California: A rejoinder to the ‘conventionalisation’ debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44: 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hassanein, N. 1999. Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hinrichs, C.C. 2003. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IAASTD [International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development]. 2008. http://www.agassessment.org/. Accessed 15 May 2010.
  30. IPCC. 2007. Mitigation of climate change: contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In Climate change 2007, ed. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, and L.A. Meyer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lockeretz, W., and P. Madden. 1987. Midwestern organic farming: A ten-year follow-up. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matson, P.A., W.J. Parton, A.G. Power, and M.J. Swift. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, B. 1995. Pasture management to sustain agriculture. In Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture, ed. M.A. Altieri, 321–348. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. NRC [National Research Council]. 2010. Toward sustainable agricultural systems in the 21 st century. Washington, D.C.: Natl. Acad. Press.Google Scholar
  37. Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41: 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Padel, S. 2008. Values of organic producers converting at different times: Results of a focus group study in five European countries. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patel, R. 2007. Stuffed and starved. Markets, power and the hidden battle over the World’s Food System. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
  40. Patton, M.Q. 2001. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, and A. Wright. 2009. Nature’s matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  42. Pratt, J. 2009. Incorporation and resistance: Analytical issues in the conventionalization debate and alternative food chains. Journal of Agrarian Change 9: 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ragin, C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Raynolds, L. 2000. Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosmann, R.L. 1994. Farmer initiated on-farm research. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 9: 34–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Savory, A. 2008. Holistic management: Embracing complexity in managing rangelands. Grassroots: Newsletter of the Grassland Society of Southern. Africa 8: 11–15.Google Scholar
  47. Stuart, D., and S. Gillon. 2013. Scaling up to address new challenges to conservation on US farmland. Land Use Policy 31: 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swenson, D. 2011. Measuring the economic impacts of increased fresh fruit and vegetable production in Iowa considering metropolitan demand. A Technical Report Submitted to the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
  49. Tomich, T.P., S. Brodt, H. Ferris, R. Galt, W.R. Horwath, E. Kebreab, J.H.J. Leveau, D. Liptzin, M. Lubell, P. Merel, R. Michelmore, T. Rosenstock, K. Scow, J. Six, N. Williams, and L. Yang. 2011. Agroecology: A review from a global-change perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner, R.E., and N.N. Rabalais. 2003. Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River Basin for 200 years. BioScience 53: 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture]. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic farming. Washington, D.C.: USDA.Google Scholar
  52. USDA. 2007. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/index.php. Accessed 20 October 2013.
  53. USDA. 2008a. Economic Research Service. Organic production. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/Organic/. Accessed 17 August 2010. USDA. 2008b. National Agricultural Statistics Service State and County data. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov (verified October 2013). USDA–NASS, Washington, DC.
  54. van der Ploeg, J.D. 2010. The peasantries of the twenty-first century: The commoditization debate revisited. Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vanloqueren, G., and P.V. Baret. 2009. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy 38: 971–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wells, B., S. Gradwell, and R. Yoder. 1999. Growing food, growing community: community supported agriculture in rural Iowa. Community Development Journal 34: 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wolf, S. 1995. Cropping systems and conservation policy: The roles of agrichemical dealers and independent crop consultants. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50: 263–269.Google Scholar
  59. Wolf, S., and P. Nowak. 1995. Development of information intensive agrichemical management services in Wisconsin. Environmental Management 19: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolf, S., and A. Bonanno (Eds). Forthcoming. The neoliberal regime in agri-food: Crisis, resilience and restructuring. London: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
  61. Wolf, S., and F. Buttel. 1996. The political economy of precision farming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolf, S., and E. Primmer. 2006. Between incentives and action: A pilot study of biodiversity conservation competencies for multifunctional forest management in Finland. Society and Natural Resources 19: 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright, E.O. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations