Transitions to agroecological farming systems in the Mississippi River Basin: toward an integrated socioecological analysis
Industrial agriculture has extensive environmental and social costs, and efforts to create alternative farming systems are widespread if not yet widely successful. This study explored how a set of grain farmers and rotational graziers in Iowa transitioned to agroecological management practices. Our focus on the resources and strategies that farmers mobilized to develop opportunities for, and overcome barriers to, transitioning to alternative practices allows us to go beyond the existing literature focused on why farmers transition. We attend to both the ecological and socioeconomic context of innovation by comparing processes of technical change in two contrasting regions of Iowa. Farmers cultivated farm-level biodiversity and enterprise diversity, developed new cognitive and psychological competencies, and overcame barriers to innovation by developing external network linkages with peers, knowledge organizations, and federal policies. Our research provides insights into how biophysical, cognitive, structural and market considerations can be integrated into research efforts that aim to make sense of innovation toward sustainable agriculture.
KeywordsAgroecology Competencies Innovation Iowa Resource-based view Sustainable transitions
- Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, M. 2004. Farming for us all: Practical agriculture & the cultivation of sustainability. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
- Buttel, F.H., O. Larson, and G. Gillespie. 1990. The sociology of agriculture. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. 2003. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 249–291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- EWG [Environmental Working Group]. 2013. Farm subsidy database. http://farm.ewg.org. Accessed 20 October 2013.
- EPA SAB [Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board]. 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: an update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-08-004. EPA, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
- Gliessman, S.R. 2007. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From farming to biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Greene, C., and A. Kremen. 2003. U.S. organic farming in 2000–2001. Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 780. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
- Hassanein, N. 1999. Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- IAASTD [International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development]. 2008. http://www.agassessment.org/. Accessed 15 May 2010.
- IPCC. 2007. Mitigation of climate change: contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In Climate change 2007, ed. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, and L.A. Meyer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, B. 1995. Pasture management to sustain agriculture. In Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture, ed. M.A. Altieri, 321–348. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- NRC [National Research Council]. 2010. Toward sustainable agricultural systems in the 21 st century. Washington, D.C.: Natl. Acad. Press.Google Scholar
- Patel, R. 2007. Stuffed and starved. Markets, power and the hidden battle over the World’s Food System. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
- Patton, M.Q. 2001. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, and A. Wright. 2009. Nature’s matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Ragin, C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Savory, A. 2008. Holistic management: Embracing complexity in managing rangelands. Grassroots: Newsletter of the Grassland Society of Southern. Africa 8: 11–15.Google Scholar
- Swenson, D. 2011. Measuring the economic impacts of increased fresh fruit and vegetable production in Iowa considering metropolitan demand. A Technical Report Submitted to the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
- Tomich, T.P., S. Brodt, H. Ferris, R. Galt, W.R. Horwath, E. Kebreab, J.H.J. Leveau, D. Liptzin, M. Lubell, P. Merel, R. Michelmore, T. Rosenstock, K. Scow, J. Six, N. Williams, and L. Yang. 2011. Agroecology: A review from a global-change perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture]. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic farming. Washington, D.C.: USDA.Google Scholar
- USDA. 2007. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/index.php. Accessed 20 October 2013.
- Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolf, S. 1995. Cropping systems and conservation policy: The roles of agrichemical dealers and independent crop consultants. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50: 263–269.Google Scholar
- Wolf, S., and A. Bonanno (Eds). Forthcoming. The neoliberal regime in agri-food: Crisis, resilience and restructuring. London: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Wright, E.O. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar