The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics
- 2.6k Downloads
Concerns about the unsustainability of the conventional food system have brought attention to so called alternative food networks (AFNs), which are widely thought to be more sustainable. However, claims made about AFNs’ sustainability have been subject to a range of criticisms. Some of them present counterevidence, while others have pointed to problematic underlying features in the academic literature and popular discourse that may hamper our understanding of AFNs’ sustainability. Considering these criticisms, together with the fact that the literature often addresses a specific type of AFN or a specific sustainability-related issue, it is hard to form a clear overall picture of the sustainability promise of AFNs. In this article, we seek to contribute to a clearer understanding of this promise through a structured review, focusing on links between AFN characteristics and sustainability. Through an analysis of AFN conceptualizations reflected in the literature, we identify and consolidate their key characteristics. We then synthesize claims of how these characteristics may translate into sustainability, finding a wide range of potential direct and indirect impacts. Examining these from different angles, we find that the sustainability promise of AFNs found in these claims is qualified by the presence of potentially unaddressed issues, by criticisms regarding for example the evidence base of the assumed impacts and their power in addressing sustainability, and by considerations of how these impacts might play out in actual, real-life food networks. Indirect impacts of learning and participation may be highly significant for sustainability. We conclude with recommendations for research and practice.
KeywordsAlternative food networks Localized food systems Short food supply chains Sustainability
We would like to thank the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments on this paper, as well as Anne Murcott who provided helpful commentary on an earlier version. Funding from the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Foundation for Economic Education is gratefully acknowledged.
- Berry, W. 1987. A defense of the family farm. In Is there a moral obligation to save the family farm?, ed. G. Comstock, 347–360. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cone, C.A., and A. Myhre. 2000. Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization 59(2): 187–197.Google Scholar
- DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2002. The strategy for sustainable farming and food. Facing the future. DEFRA Publications. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/policy/sustainfarmfood/documents/sffs.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2014.
- Edwards-Jones, G., L. Milà i Canals, N. Hounsome, M. Truninger, G. Koerber, B. Hounsome, P. Cross, E.H. York, A. Hospido, K. Plassman, I.M. Harris, R.T. Edwards, G.A.S. Day, A.D. Tomos, S.J. Cowell, and D.L. Jones. 2008. Testing the assertion that “local food is best”: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(5): 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Commission. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF. Accessed 6 May 2014.
- FARMA. 2010. Certification—abridged rules. http://www.farmersmarkets.net/certification2.htm. Accessed 6 May 2014.
- Gold, M.V. 2007. What is organic production? United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library. http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml. Accessed 24 January 2013.
- Kemp, R., and P. Martens. 2007. Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 3(2): 5–14.Google Scholar
- Maxey, L. 2007. From “alternative” to “sustainable” food. In Alternative food geographies: Concepts and debates, ed. D. Maye, L. Holloway, and M. Kneafsey, 55–75. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Milestad, R., L. Westberg, U. Geber, and J. Björklund. 2010. Enhancing adaptive capacity in food systems: Learning at farmers’ markets in Sweden. Ecology and Society 15(3): 29.Google Scholar
- Morgan, K., T. Marsden, and J. Murdoch. 2006. Worlds of food: Place, power and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Norberg-Hodge, H., T. Merrifield, and S. Gorelick. 2002. Bringing the food economy home: Local alternatives to global agribusiness. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Redclift, M. 2002. Pathways to sustainability? Geography 87(3): 189–196.Google Scholar
- Reisch, L., U. Eberle, and S. Lorek. 2013. Sustainable food consumption: An overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 9(2): 7–25.Google Scholar
- Sustain. 2002. Sustainable food chains. Briefing paper 1. Local food; benefits, obstacles, and opportunities. Sustain: The Alliance for Better Food and Farming, London. http://www.sustainweb.org/pdf/briefing1.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2014.
- Sustain. 2013. The sustain guide to good food. Sustain: The Alliance for Better Food and Farming, London.Google Scholar
- Sustainable Development Commission. 2005. Sustainability implications for the Little Red Tractor Scheme. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=195. Accessed 28 March 2014.