Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 307–322 | Cite as

Civic agriculture and community engagement

  • Brian K. Obach
  • Kathleen Tobin
Article

Abstract

Several scholars have claimed that small-scale agriculture in which farmers sell goods to the local market has the potential to strengthen social ties and a sense of community, a phenomenon referred to as “civic agriculture.” Proponents see promise in the increase in the number of community supported agriculture (CSA) programs, farmers markets, and other locally orientated distribution systems as well as the growing interest among consumers for buying locally produced goods. Yet others have suggested that these novel or reborn distribution mechanisms are still primarily means of instrumental economic exchange and that optimistic characterizations of a renewed sense of community emerging from these practices are unfounded. This study provides an empirical assessment of the extent to which these community-based agriculture markets are associated with connection to community, volunteerism, and civic and political activities. In order to assess the relationship between civic agriculture and community engagement, we surveyed over 1,300 people in the Mid-Hudson region of New York State. The study design includes “civic agriculture participants” as the unit of analysis, defined as CSA farm members, shoppers at independent health food stores, and farmers market patrons. For comparison, a telephone survey of randomly selected residents of the region’s general population was also conducted. Unlike studies that focus solely on the perceptions of certain civic agriculture participants (e.g., CSA members), by comparing the perceptions and behaviors of those engaged in a range of civic agriculture practices, we are able to identify the effects of different forms of participation. The results demonstrate higher levels of voluntarism and engagement in local politics among civic agriculture participants relative to the general population. In addition, we found variation among those engaged in different forms of civic agriculture, with those immersed in more socially embedded forms of exchange demonstrating greater community and political involvement. These findings lend empirical support to the civic agriculture thesis.

Keywords

Civic agriculture Civic engagement Sustainable agriculture Community supported agriculture Farmers markets 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and the contribution of student research assistants Chris Utzig, Carolyn Burgess, Jenna Dern, Layla Al Qaisi, Maria Davila, and Emily Sobel. The authors also wish to thank the farmers, business owners and farmers market managers who allowed us to survey their members and customers. This project was supported by funding from the Center for Research, Regional Education and Outreach at SUNY New Paltz, the United University Professions and the National Science Foundation (Award #0550550).

References

  1. Almond, G.A., and S. Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baggetta, M. 2009. Civic opportunities in associations: Interpersonal interaction, governance experience, and institutional relationships. Social Forces 88(1): 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B.R. 1995. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bellah, R.N., R. Madsen, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S.M. Tipton. 1996. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Block, F. 1990. Postindustrial possibilities: A critique of economic discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K. Lehman Schlozman. 1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehm, J., and W. Rahn. 1997. Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane, W. 1979. The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J., and J. Rogers. 1992. Secondary associations and democratic governance. In Associations and democracy, ed. E.O. Wright, 393–472. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. CNCS (Corporation for National and Community Service). 2011. Volunteering and civic engagement. Local Environment 13(3): 203–218. http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov/NY.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, J.E., E.G. Grabb, and D.E. Baer. 1992. Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries. American Sociological Review 57(2): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLind, L.B., and J. Bingen. 2008. Place and civic culture: Re-thinking the context for local agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21: 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLind, L.B. 2011. Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28: 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLind, L.B. 1999. Close encounters with a CSA: The reflections of a bruised and somewhat wiser anthropologist. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DuPuis, E.M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go home to eat? Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21(3): 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DuPuis, E.M., D. Goodman, and J. Harrison. 2006. Just values or just value? Remaking the local in agro-food studies. In Between the local and the global: Confronting complexity in the contemporary agri-food sector, ed. T. Marsden, and J. Murdoch, 241–268. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  17. Erickson, B.H., and T.A. Nosanchuk. 1990. How and apolitical association politicizes. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 27(2): 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feagan, R., and A. Henderson. 2009. Devon Acres CSA: Local struggles in a global food system. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, D. 2003. Every farm a factory: The industrial ideal in American agriculture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedland, W. 1994. The new globalization: The case of fresh produce. In From Columbus to Conagra: The globalization of agriculture and food, ed. A. Bonanno, et al., 210–231. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  21. GSS (General Social Survey). 2013. http://www3.norc.org/gss+website/.
  22. Goldschmidt, W. 1978. Large-scale farming and the rural social structure. Rural Sociology 43(3): 362–366.Google Scholar
  23. Goss, K., R. Rodefeld, and F. Buttel. 1980. The political economy of class structure in US agriculture. In The rural sociology of advanced societies, ed. F. Buttel, and H. Newby, 83–132. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld Osmum.Google Scholar
  24. Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guthman, J. 2004a. The trouble with “organic lite” in California: A rejoinder to the “conventionalism” debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44(3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guthman, J. 2004b. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Guthman, J. 2003. Fast food/organic food: Reflexive tastes and the making of “yuppie chow”. Social & Cultural Geography 4(1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heffernan, W. 1999. Consolidation in the food and agriculture system. Report to the National Farmers Union, 5 February 1999. http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/NFUFarmCrisis.htm. Accessed 24 Jan 2012.
  30. Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agriculture market. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacques, S., and L. Collins. 2003. Community supported agriculture: An alternative to agribusiness. Geography Review 16(5): 30–33.Google Scholar
  32. Janssen, B. 2010. Local food, local engagement: Community-supported agriculture in eastern Iowa. Culture and Agriculture 32(1): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kwon, H. 2004. Associations, civic norms, and democracy: Revisiting the Italian case. Theory and Society 33(2): 135–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lobao, L. 1990. Locality and inequality. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lobao, L., and K. Meyer. 2001. The great agricultural transition: Crisis, change, and social consequences of twentieth century US farming. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyson, T.A. 2004. Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lyson, T.A., R.J. Torres, and R. Welsh. 2001. Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement, and community welfare. Social Forces 80(1): 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magdoff, F., J.B. Foster, and F.H. Buttel. 2000. Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  39. Martinez, S. 2007. The US food marketing system: Recent developments, 1997–2006. Economic Research Report No. (ERR42). United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  40. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M. Brashears. 2006. Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 71: 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murdoch, J., T. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2000. Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography 76(2): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. NCOC (National Conference on Citizenship). 2006. America’s civic health index: Broken engagement. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  43. Oldenburg, R. 1991. The great good place. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  44. Pew Research. 2012. Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/. Accessed 25 Jan 2012.
  45. Piore, M.J., and C.F. Sabel. 1984. The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Pole, A., and M. Gray. 2013. Farming alone? What’s up with the “C” in community supported agriculture? Agriculture and Human Values 30: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  48. Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. The Saguaro Seminar at Harvard University. 2006. 2006 Social capital benchmark community survey. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/saguaro/measurement/2006sccs.htm Accessed 25 Jan 2012.
  50. Schnell, S.M. 2007. Food with a farmer’s face: Community-supported agriculture in the United States. The Geographical Review 97(4): 550–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheets, J.A. 2011. Food—By the people, for the people: The study of the relationship between local food networks and civic engagement. Paper presented at the Joint Annual Meetings of Agriculture, Food and Human Values Society, Association for the Study of Food and Society, and the Society for Anthropology of Food and Nutrition. June 2011, Missoula, MT.Google Scholar
  52. Skocpol, T. 2003. Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  53. Skocpol, T., M. Ganz, and Z. Munson. 2000. A nation of organizers: Institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review 94(3): 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tocqueville, A. 2003. Democracy in America. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  55. Tolbert, C.M. 2005. Minding our own business: Local retail establishments and the future of southern civic community. Social Forces 83(4): 1309–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tolbert, C.M., T. Lyson, and M.D. Irwin. 1998. Local capitalism, civic engagement, and socioeconomic well-being. Social Forces 77(2): 401–427.Google Scholar
  57. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2009. 2007 Census of agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/usv1.pdf.
  58. US BLS (United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2013. Volunteering in the US 2012. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf.
  59. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). State & county quickfacts: New York State. http://quickfacts.census.gov. Accessed 22 Jan 2012
  60. Verba, S., and N.H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  61. Verba, S., K. Lehman Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyState University of New YorkNew PaltzUSA
  2. 2.Center for Research, Regional Education and Outreach (CRREO)State University of New YorkNew PaltzUSA

Personalised recommendations