It’s not all about the money: understanding farmers’ labor allocation choices
- 878 Downloads
Using a nationally representative survey of farm operators in Ireland, this study examines the effect of non-pecuniary benefits from farm work on labor allocation choices. Results suggest that non-pecuniary benefits affect both the decision to enter the off-farm labor market and also once that decision is made, the amount of time spent working off-farm. We find our derived variable representing non-monetary benefits associated with farm work to have a substantial impact similar to the effect of other more widely reported personal and farm structural variables such as the age of the farm operator, farm size, and farming system. The existence of these non-pecuniary benefits serves to increase the implied wage to farmers for their farm work. This in turn can lead to allocations of labor that would seem suboptimal from a purely financial point of view. Rural development policies aimed at creating off-farm opportunities could fail unless returns to off-farm work are high enough to compensate the farmer for losing the benefits associated with the farming lifestyle. From a methodological perspective, our analysis indicates that failure to model off-farm labor allocation choices as a two-part process may lead to some incorrect conclusions regarding the effect of certain explanatory variables. Outside of explaining farmers’ off-farm labor supply it would be useful to incorporate farmer perceptions regarding the non-pecuniary benefits from farming in economic models of farm behavior across a range of activities as this could lead to much more accurate predictions of farmers’ responses to policy changes.
KeywordsOff-farm employment Farming values Ireland Double-hurdle model
The authors are grateful to the editor in chief and three reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript.
- Ackerman, N., D. Jenson, and D. Bailey. 1989. Major sources of satisfaction for farm families. Utah Science 50: 134–142.Google Scholar
- Colman, D., and D. Harvey. 2004. The future of UK dairy farming. Report commissioned jointly by the MDC, DIAL, and Defra. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/food/industry/sectors/milk/pdf/colman-harveyreport.pdf Accessed 11 July 2013.
- Connolly, L., A. Kinsella, G. Quinlan, and B. Moran. 2010. National farm survey. Dublin: Rural Economy Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Hennessy, T., and F. Thorne. 2005. How decoupled are decoupled payments? The evidence from Ireland. Eurochoices 4(1): 30–35.Google Scholar
- Huffman, W.E., and H. El-Osta. 1998. Off-farm work participation, off-farm labor supply, and on-farm labor demand of US farm operators. Paper presented at the 1998 Summer AAEA meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
- Keeney, M., and A. Matthews. 2000. Multiple job holding—Explaining participation in off-farm employment, labor demand, and labor supply of Irish farm households. Paper presented at the Agricultural Economics Society Conference, Manchester, UK, April 2000.Google Scholar
- Kimhi, A., and N. Nachlieli. 2001. Inter-generational succession on Israeli family farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(2): 42–58.Google Scholar
- Koontz, T.M. 2001. Money talks? But to whom? Financial versus nonmonetary motivations in land use decisions. Society and Natural Resources 14: 510–565.Google Scholar
- Kuehne, G., H. Bjornland, and B. Cheers. 2007. There’s more than one type of farmer: Acknowledging farmers’ diversity—An Australian perspective. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2: 179–186.Google Scholar
- Lass, D., J. Findeis, and M. Hallberg. 1989. Off-farm labor employment decisions by Massachusetts farm households. Northern Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics: 149–159.Google Scholar
- Long, J.S., and J. Freese. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J.C. 1967. Psychometric theory, 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Willock, J., I.J. Deary, G. Edwards Jones, G. Gibson, M.J. McGregor, A. Sutherland, J.B. Dent, O. Morgan, and R. Grieve. 1999a. The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally oriented behavior in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(2): 286–303.Google Scholar
- Willock, J., I.J. Deary, M.J. McGregor, A. Sutherland, J.B. Dent, G. Edwards Jones, R. Grieve, O. Morgan, G. Gibson, and E. Austin. 1999b. Farmers’ attitudes, objectives, behaviors, and personality traits: The Edinburgh study of decision making on farms. Journal of Vocational Behavior 54(1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. 2008. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: South Western College Publications.Google Scholar