Robotic milking technologies and renegotiating situated ethical relationships on UK dairy farms
- 1.4k Downloads
Robotic or automatic milking systems (AMS) are novel technologies that take over the labor of dairy farming and reduce the need for human–animal interactions. Because robotic milking involves the replacement of ‘conventional’ twice-a-day milking managed by people with a system that supposedly allows cows the freedom to be milked automatically whenever they choose, some claim robotic milking has health and welfare benefits for cows, increases productivity, and has lifestyle advantages for dairy farmers. This paper examines how established ethical relations on dairy farms are unsettled by the intervention of a radically different technology such as AMS. The renegotiation of ethical relationships is thus an important dimension of how the actors involved are re-assembled around a new technology. The paper draws on in-depth research on UK dairy farms comparing those using conventional milking technologies with those using AMS. We explore the situated ethical relations that are negotiated in practice, focusing on the contingent and complex nature of human–animal–technology interactions. We show that ethical relations are situated and emergent, and that as the identities, roles, and subjectivities of humans and animals are unsettled through the intervention of a new technology, the ethical relations also shift.
KeywordsSituated ethics Dairy farming Robotic milking UK Technology Animal studies
Automatic milking systems
Environmental virtue ethic of care
The authors would like to thank three reviewers and the editor of this journal for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. We would also like to thank the audiences who heard various oral presentations of the paper and provided encouraging and helpful comments.
- Butler, D., L. Holloway, and C. Bear. 2012. The impact of technological change in dairy farming: Robotic milking systems and the changing role of the stockperson. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 173: 1–6.Google Scholar
- Donovan, J., and C. Adams. 2007. Feminist care tradition in animal ethics: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Emel, J., and J. Wolch. 1998. Witnessing the animal moment. In Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, ed. J. Wolch, and J. Emel, 1–24. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Francione, G.L. 2007. Reflections on “animals, property, and the law” and “rain without thunder”. Law and Contemporary Problems 70(1): 9–57.Google Scholar
- Franklin, A. 1999. Animals and modern culture: A sociology of human–animal relations in modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fraser, D. 2003. Assessing farm animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Animal Welfare 12(4): 433–443.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D.J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. (trans: Lovitt, W.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Heutinck, L., and C. Driessen. 2007. The ethics of automatic milking systems and grazing in dairy cattle. In Sustainable food production and ethics, ed. W. Zollitsch, C. Winckler, S. Waiblinger, and A. Haslberger, 249–254. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hogeveen, H., and A. Meijering, eds. 2000. Robotic milking: Proceedings of the international symposium held in Lelystad, The Netherlands 17–19 August 2000. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hogeveen, H., Y. van der Vorst, K. de Koning, and B.A. Slaghuis. 2001. Concepts et implications de la traite automatisée. In Proceedings of the 25 e symposium sur les Bovins Laitiers, Québec, Canada, 17 October 2001, 104–120. Québec, Canada: CRAAQ. http://www.agrireseau.qc.ca/bovinslaitiers/documents/2001_Hogeveen_anglais.pdf.
- Holloway, L., C. Bear, and K. Wilkinson. 2013. Re-capturing bovine life: Robot-cow relationships, freedom and control in dairy farming. Journal of Rural Studies. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.01.006.
- Latour, B. 2006. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lely, n.d. Lely’s free cow traffic: More milk, healthier cows and a happy farmer—With free cow traffic. http://www.lely.com/uploads/original/documents/Brochures/Farming_tips/Free_Cow_Traffic/Vrij_koeverkeer_-_Brochure_-_EN.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011.
- Lynn, W. 1998. Animals, ethics and geography. In Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, ed. J. Wolch, and J. Emel, 280–297. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Meijering, A., H. Hogeveen, and C.J.A.M. de Koning (eds.). 2004. Automatic milking: A better understanding. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Miele, M., and B. Boch. 2007. Competing discourses of farm animal welfare and agri-food restructuring. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15(3): 1–7.Google Scholar
- Noske, B. 1997. Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. Montréal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
- Owen, J. 2003. Evaluating robotic milking at Gelli Aur College. State Veterinary Journal 13: 15–18.Google Scholar
- Pugh, J. 2011. End for the herringbone? Farmers Guardian 8 July 2011. http://www.farmersguardian.com/home/business/business-news/end-for-the-herringbone?/40120.article. Accessed 25 July 2011.
- Rollin, B.E. 1995. Farm animal welfare: Social, bioethical, and research issues. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
- Seabrook, M.F. 1992. The perception by stockpersons of the effect on their esteem, self-concept and satisfaction of the incorporation of automatic milking into their herds. In Proceedings of the international symposium on prospects for automatic milking, Wageningen, Netherlands, 23–25 November 1992, eds. A.H. Ipema, A.C. Lippus, J.H.M. Metz, and W. Rossing, 409–413. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
- Semex. 2012. Robot Ready™ sires now available from Semex. Press release. 2 April 2012.Google Scholar
- Thierman, S. 2010. Apparatuses of animality: Foucault goes to a slaughterhouse. Foucault Studies 9: 89–110.Google Scholar
- Twine, R. 2007. Animal genomics and ambivalence: A sociology of animal bodies in agricultural biotechnology. Genomics, Society and Policy 3(2): 99–117.Google Scholar
- Twine, R. 2010. Animals as biotechnology: Ethics, sustainability, and critical animal studies. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wilkie, R.M. 2010. Livestock/deadstock: Working with farm animals from birth to slaughter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, C. 2013. Before the law: Humans and other animals in a biopolitical frame. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar