Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 3–17 | Cite as

Front and back of the house: socio-spatial inequalities in food work

  • Carolyn Sachs
  • Patricia Allen
  • A. Rachel Terman
  • Jennifer HaydenEmail author
  • Christina Hatcher
Article

Abstract

Work on farms and in restaurants is characterized by highly gendered and racialized divisions of labor, low wages, and persistent inequalities. Gender, race, and ethnicity often determine the spaces where people work in the food system. Although some research focuses on gendered divisions of labor in restaurants and on farms, few efforts look more broadly at intersectional inequalities in food work. Our study examines how inequality is perpetuated through restaurant and farm work in the United States and, specifically, how gender and race/ethnicity influence where people work, their tasks and responsibilities, and their work experiences. In describing restaurant work, people in the restaurant industry typically refer to the front and back of the house to distinguish between different working spaces, jobs, and workers. We use this spatial metaphor of front and back of the house to analyze intersectional inequalities of food work in restaurants and on farms. The data derive from conversations with 63 restaurant and farm owners, managers, and workers in California and Pennsylvania. Our findings suggest that gendered and racialized bodies often define who works in the front and back of the “house,” and that owners and workers often naturalize gender and racial divisions of labor in food work. Despite these patterns, we found evidence of attempts to reduce these inequalities on farms and in restaurants.

Keywords

US food system Workers Migrant labor Gendered labor Inequality regime Food work Restaurant Farm 

References

  1. Acker, J. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20(4): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, J., and D.R. Van Houten. 1974. Differential recruitment and control: The sex structuring of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 19(2): 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Associated Press. 2010. Arizona immigration crackdown, Sizzler restaurants raided, 9 arrested. Christian Science Monitor June 3.Google Scholar
  4. Barndt, D. 1999. Women working the NAFTA food chain: Women, food, and globalization. Toronto: Second Story Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandth, B. 1994. Changing femininity: The social construction of women farmers in Norway. Sociologia Ruralis 34(2–3): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandth, B. 1995. Rural masculinity in transition: Gender images in tractor advertisements. Journal of Rural Studies 11(2): 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandth, B. 1999. Modernity, feminism and farm women. Unpublished paper given at Gender and Transformation in Rural Europe, Wageningen, Netherlands, 14–17 October 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Brandth, B. 2002. Gender identity in European family farming: A literature review. Sociologia Ruralis 42(3): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britton, D. 2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society 14(3): 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant, L. 1999. The detraditionalization of occupational identities in farming in South Australia. Sociologia Ruralis 39(2): 236–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campos-Soria, J.A., A. Marchante-Mera, and M.A. Ropero-García. 2010. Patterns of occupational segregation by gender in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30(1): 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coldwell, I. 2010. Masculinities in the rural and the agricultural: A literature review. Sociologia Ruralis 50(2): 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, P.H. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Crenshaw, K.W. 1995. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crompton, R., and K. Sanderson. 1990. Gendered jobs and social change. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  16. Dolan, C. 2004. On farm and packhouse: Employment at the bottom of a global value chain. Rural Sociology 69(1): 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fine, G.A. 2008. Kitchens: The culture of restaurant work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gabriel, Y. 1990. Working lives in catering. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, E.J. 1993a. Waitering/waitressing: Engendering the work of table servers. Gender & Society 7(3): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, E.J. 1993b. Smiling, deferring, and flirting. Work and Occupations 20(4): 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, M., and J. Jargon. 2011. Cases target illegal labor: Immigration crackdown widens with criminal probe and arrests at restaurant chains. Wall Street Journal April 21.Google Scholar
  24. Kearney, M., and C. Nagengast. 1989. Anthropological perspectives on transnational communities in rural California. Working Group on Farm Labor and Rural Poverty Working Paper No. 3. Davis, CA: California Institute for Rural Studies.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, E., S.K. Ammons, and P. Moen. 2010. Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender & Society 24(3): 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kidder, T., and K. Raworth. 2004. “Good jobs” and hidden costs: Women workers documenting the price of precarious employment. Gender & Development 12(2): 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jonsson, I.M., M.P. Ekström, and T. Nygren. 2008. Key concepts towards a stance on gender in the restaurant. Journal of Foodservice 19(1): 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaPointe, E. 1992. Relationships with waitresses: Gendered social distance in restaurant hierarchies. Qualitative Sociology 15(4): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leckie, G. 1996. ‘They never trusted me to drive’: Farm girls and the gender relations of agricultural information transfer. Gender, Place and Culture 3(3): 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Massey, D.B. 1984. Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Naples, N., and C. Sachs. 2000. Standpoint epistemology and the uses of self-reflection in feminist ethnography: Lessons from rural sociology. Rural Sociology 65(2): 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pfeffer, M.J. 1983. Social origins of three systems of farm production in the United States. Rural Sociology 48(4): 540–562.Google Scholar
  33. Purcell, K. 1997. Women’s employment in UK tourism: Gender roles and labour markets. In Gender, work and tourism, ed. M.T. Sinclair, 33–56. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Romm, D. 1989. “Restauration” theater: Giving direction to service. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 29(4): 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sachs, C. 1996. Gendered fields: Rural women, agriculture, and environment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Saugeres, L. 2002. Of tractors and men: Masculinity, technology and power in a French farming community. Sociologia Ruralis 42(2): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sommerville, K.L. 2007. Hospitality employee management and supervision: Concepts and practical applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Trauger, A., C. Sachs, M. Barbercheck, K. Brasier, and N.E. Kiernan. 2010. “Our market is our community”: Women farmers and civic agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Agriculture and Human Values 27(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trautner, M.N. 2005. Doing gender, doing class: The performance of sexuality in exotic dance clubs. Gender & Society 19(6): 771–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012a. Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by detailed occupation and sex. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.htm. Accessed 8 April 2013.
  41. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012b. Occupational Employment Statistics: May 2012 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States. http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#35-0000. Accessed 8 April 2013.
  42. US Department of Agriculture. 2007. The Census of Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Fact_Sheets/index.asp. Accessed 20 Jan 2012.
  43. US Department of Labor. 2000. Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey, 199798: A demographic and employment profile of United States farmworkers. Research Report No. 8. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  44. US Department of Labor. 2010. National Agricultural Workers Survey, 20072009. Employment and Training Administration. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, C. 1995. Still a man’s world: Men who do “women’s work”. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn Sachs
    • 1
  • Patricia Allen
    • 2
  • A. Rachel Terman
    • 4
  • Jennifer Hayden
    • 4
    Email author
  • Christina Hatcher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Women’s StudiesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Food Systems and SocietyMarylhurst UniversityMarylhurstUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  4. 4.Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural SociologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations