Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 605–614 | Cite as

CSA membership and psychological needs fulfillment: an application of self-determination theory

  • Lydia Zepeda
  • Anna Reznickova
  • Willow Saranna Russell
Article

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the relevance of self-determination theory to explain retention and attrition in community supported agriculture (CSA). Using a focus group study of CSA members, we examined whether belonging to a CSA supports basic psychological needs for autonomy, competency and relatedness. We found that it did for continuing members. However, for those who did not renew, membership reduced their sense of autonomy, competency, and relatedness. For continuing members, the intensity of their involvement did not affect their needs satisfaction, though it did influence how those needs were met. Continuing CSA members were also intrinsically motivated and internalized extrinsic motivations.

Keywords

Community supported agriculture (CSA) Self-determination theory (SDT) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the focus group participants, as well as to Claire Strader, the managing farmer at Troy Community Farm, and to Dr. Marcia Caton Campbell. We also thank the W.K. Kellogg Foundation who funded the original data collection via a grant entitled “UW-Troy Gardens Sustainable Urban Agriculture Learning Community Project,” and to the UW-Madison Community and Regional Food Systems Project for funding this analysis. Special gratitude is extended to an anonymous reviewer for all their suggestions.

References

  1. Adams, D.C., and M.J. Salois. 2010. Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25: 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S., K.E. Thompson, and J. Engelken. 2004. Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK. European Journal of Marketing 38(8): 995–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, K.W., and T. Kasser. 2005. Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research 74: 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan, S.M. 2012. Official: US needs more young farmers, ranchers. The Washington Post 9 April 2012. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nations-farmers-ranchers-aging-usda-fears/2012/04/08/gIQAPCem5S_story.html. Accessed 10 April 2012.
  5. Cone, C.A., and A. Myhre. 2000. Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization 59(2): 187–197.Google Scholar
  6. Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLind, L.B. 1999. Close encounters with a CSA: The reflections of a bruised and somewhat wiser anthropologist. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeLind, L.B., and A.E. Ferguson. 1999. Is this a women’s movement? The relationship of gender to community-supported agriculture in Michigan. Human Organization 58(2): 190–200.Google Scholar
  10. Fairshare. 2012. CSA health insurance rebate. In CSA health insurance rebate. http://www.csacoalition.org/our-work/csa-insurance-rebate/. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  11. Farnsworth, R.L., S.R. Thompson, K.A. Drury, and R.E. Warner. 1996. Community supported agriculture: Filling a niche market. Journal of Food Distribution Research 27(1): 90–98.Google Scholar
  12. Feagan, R., and A. Henderson. 2009. Devon acres CSA: Local struggles in a global food system. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardesty, S.D., and P. Leff. 2009. Determining marketing costs and returns in alternative marketing channels. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(1): 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayden, J., and D. Buck. 2012. Doing community supported agriculture: Tactile space, affect, and effects of membership. Geoforum 43: 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hokanen, P., B. Verplanken, and S.O. Olsen. 2006. Ethical values and motives driving food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(5): 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Howaldt, J., and M. Schwarz. 2010. Social innovation: Concepts, research fields, and international trends. www.internationalmonitoring.com. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  17. Indian Line Farm. n.d. Community supported agriculture at Indian Line Farm. http://www.indianlinefarm.com/csa.html. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  18. Jekanowski, M.D., D.R. Williams II, and W.A. Schiek. 2000. Consumers’ willingness to purchase locally produced agricultural products: An analysis of an Indiana survey. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(8): 43–53.Google Scholar
  19. Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3): 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolodinsky, J.M., and L.L. Pelch. 1997. Factors influencing the decision to join a community supported agriculture (CSA) farm. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 10(2/3): 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lang, B.K. 2005. Expanding our understanding of community supported agriculture (CSA): An examination of member satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 26(2): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lusk, J.L., and B.C. Briggeman. 2009. Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(1): 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McFadden, S. 2004. The history of community supported agriculture, part I. Community farms in the 21st century: Poised for another wave of growth? Rodale Institute. http://newfarm.rodaleinstitute.org/features/0104/csa-history/part1.shtml. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  24. Moulaert, F., F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, and S. Gonzalez. 2005. Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies 42(11): 1669–1990.Google Scholar
  25. Onianwa, O., G. Wheelock, and M. Mojica. 2005. Determinants of farmer-to-consumer direct-market shoppers. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(1): 130–134.Google Scholar
  26. Osbaldiston, R., and K.M. Sheldon. 2003. Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behaviors: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pelletier, L.G., S. Dion, K. Tuson, and I. Green-Demers. 1999. Why do people fail to adopt environmental protective behaviors? Toward a taxonomy of environmental amotivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(1): 2481–2504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phills, J.A., Jr., K. Deiglmeier, and D.T. Miller. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review Fall http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation/. Accessed 9 April 2012.
  29. Pole, A., and M. Gray. 2012. Farming alone? What’s up with the ‘‘C’’ in community supported agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9391-9.Google Scholar
  30. Press, M., and E.J. Arnould. 2011. How does organizational identification form? A consumer behavior perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 38: 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roininen, K., A. Arvola, and L. Lahteenmaki. 2006. Exploring consumers’ perceptions of local food with two different techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference 17(1): 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Russell, W.S., and L. Zepeda. 2008. The adaptive consumer: Shifting attitudes, behavior change, and CSA membership renewal. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23(2): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(11): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt, M.C., J.M. Kolodinsky, T.P. DeSisto, and F.C. Conte. 2011. Increasing farm income and local food access: A case study of a collaborative aggregation, marketing, and distribution strategy that links farmers to markets. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1(4): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Summer, J., H. Mair, and E. Nelson. 2010. Putting the culture back into agriculture: Civic engagement, community, and the celebration of local food. Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8(1/2): 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, J.B. 1970. Introducing social innovation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 6(1): 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trauger, A., C. Sachs, M. Barbercheck, K. Brasier, and N.E. Kiernan. 2010. “Our market is our community”: Women farmers and civic agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Agriculture and Human Values 27: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. USDA (US Department of Agriculture). 2009. Table 44 Selected Practices: 2007. Census of agriculture 2007. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/st99_2_044_044.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  39. Van En, R. 1997. Eating for your community. In Context: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture. http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC42/VanEn.htm. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  40. Villacorta, M., R. Koestner, and N. Lekes. 2003. Further validation of the motivation toward the environment scale. Environment and Behavior 35(4): 486–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wells, B., and S. Gradwell. 2001. Gender and resource management: Community supported agriculture as caring-practice. Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zepeda, L., and C. Leviten-Reid. 2004. Consumers’ views on local food. Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(3): 1–6.Google Scholar
  43. Zepeda, L., and J. Li. 2006. Who buys local food? Journal of Food Distribution Research 37(3): 1–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lydia Zepeda
    • 1
  • Anna Reznickova
    • 2
  • Willow Saranna Russell
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Human EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Nelson Institute of Environmental StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Social Venture Partners SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations