Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 283–297 | Cite as

There’s certainly a lot of hurting out there: navigating the trolley of progress down the supermarket aisle

  • Jane DixonEmail author
  • Bronwyn Isaacs


For the past decade, supermarket chains have been positioned as the pre-eminent actor in global and national food systems. Some agri-food scholars argue that their ever-expanding transnational supply chains have established an era of stable production-consumption relations (or Food Regime), while others point to the conflicts they are encountering with governments, social movements and ‘alternative’ consumers. However, remarkably little attention has been paid to their relationship with communities and to community system sustainability. Based on fieldwork conducted in the Goulburn Valley, Australia, we argue that supermarket operations are contributing to community tensions through contestation over valued symbols and narratives about what desirable ‘progress’ looks like. We identified three interrelated points of tension being intensified by supermarket chains: whether progress is encapsulated by being an agricultural production or a modern consumption centre; whether progress should be based on a model of corporate capital or the local small business; and to what extent modern citizens can and should support community shopping instead of convenience shopping. For long-time residents, supermarkets are paradoxical actors appealing to, as well as, challenging the narrative of a community whose economic strength was based on the surrounding natural environment and local people’s endeavours. The concepts of solastalgia and structural nostalgia are relevant, with the former referring to the place-based distress experienced by residents whose local area is changing profoundly and the latter describing a process amplifying that distress. Through exploring the political paradoxes of community solastalgia, we raise new questions about supermarket authority within contemporary Food Regimes.


Australian supermarkets Rural communities Solastalgia Structural nostalgia Food Regimes 



This study was part-funded by the Australian Research Council (Project No. DP 0773092) ‘From Seedling to Supermarket: The Social and Environmental Implications for Australia of the Restructuring of Agri-food Supply Chains’. The authors are also grateful to discussions with Michael Herzfeld, Harvard University, regarding the concept of structural nostalgia.


  1. Albrecht, G., G.-M. Sartore, L. Connor, N. Higginbotham, S. Freeman, B. Kelly, H. Stain, A. Tonna, and G. Pollard. 2007. Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australian Psychiatry 15(Suppl 1): S95–S98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht, G. 2012. The age of solastalgia. The Conversation. 7 August Accessed 1 Sept 2012. Accessed 7 Aug 2012.
  3. Albrecht, G. 2010. Solastalgia and the creation of new ways of living. In Nature and culture: Rebuilding lost connections, ed. S. Pilgrim, and J. Pretty, 217–324. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, M. Goodman, and K. Warner. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: The tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BTRS. Bureau of Transport and Regional Services. 2003. Investment trends in the lower Murray–Darling Basin. Working Paper 58. Canberra: Department of Transport and Regional Services.Google Scholar
  6. Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2005. Supermarket own-brands, supply chains and the transformation of the agri-food system. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 13(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  7. Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2007. Supermarket own brands, new foods and the reconfiguration of agri-food supply chains. In Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods, ed. D. Burch, and G. Lawrence, 100–128. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, H., and J. Dixon. 2009. Introduction to the special symposium: Twenty years of food regimes theorising. Agriculture and Human Values 26(4): 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carden, A., C. Courtemanche, and J. Melners. 2009. Does Wal-Mart reduce social capital? Public Choice 138: 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrington, K., and N. Marshall. 2008. Building multicultural social capital in regional Australia. Rural Society 18(2): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CSIRO. 2008. Water availability in the Murray–Darling Basin. Canberra: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, S., and S. Macintyre. 2006. Food enveironments and obesity—Neighbourhood or nation? International Journal of Epidemiology 35(1): 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Planning and Community Development. 2008. Goulburn Valley Region. Department of Planning and Community Development Spatial Analysis and Research Branch. Melbourne: Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Primary Industries. 2006. Goulburn. Department of Primary Industries. Melbourne: Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  15. Dixon, J. 2003. Authority, power and value in contemporary industrial food systems. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food 11(1): 31–39.Google Scholar
  16. Dixon, J. 2008. Operating upstream and downstream: How supermarkets exercise power in the food system. In A sociology of food & nutrition: The social appetite, ed. J. Germov, and L. Williams, 100–123. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, J. 2011. Diverse food economies or multi-variant capitalism: The community dynamic shaping contemporary-food systems. Community Development Journal 46(Suppl 1): i20–i35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowler, E., M. Kneafsey, R. Cox, and L. Holloway. 2009. ‘Doing food differently’: Reconnecting biological and social relationships through care for food. The Sociological Review 57: 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fishman, C. 2006. The Walmart effect: How an out-of-town superstore became a superpower. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  20. Freidberg, S. 2007. Supermarkets and imperial knowledge. Cultural Geographies 14: 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system. Sociologia Ruralis XXXIX(2): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gereffi, G., and M. Christian. 2009. The impacts of Wal-Mart: The rise and consequences of the world’s dominant retailer. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 573–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glackin, S. 2012. Kind-making, objectivity, and political neutrality; the case of solastalgia. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1): 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goetz, S., and A. Rupasingha. 2006. Wal-Mart and social capital. Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(5): 1304–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greater Shepparton Council. 2012. Economic profile. Accessed 1 Sept 2012.
  26. Guthman, J. 2008. Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practices. Cultural Geographies 15: 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guy, C., G. Clarke, and H. Eyre. 2004. Food retail change and the growth of food deserts: A case study of Cardiff. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 32: 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, M. 2007. The rise of supermarkets and asymmetries of economic power. In Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains, ed. D. Burch, and G. Lawrence, 51–73. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Herzfeld, M. 2005. Cultural intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, A. 2005. Responsible retailers? Ethical trade and the strategic re-regulation of cross-continental food supply chains. In Cross-continental food chains, ed. N. Fold, and B. Pritchard, 141–154. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Humphery, K. 1998. Shelf life: Supermarkets and the changing culture of consumption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Johnston, J., A. Biro, and N. MacKendrick. 2009. Lost in the supermarket: The corporate-organic foodscape and the struggle for food democracy. Antipode 41(3): 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirwan, J. 2004. Alternative strategies in the UK agro-food system: Interrogating the alterity of farmers’ markets. Sociologia Ruralis 44(4): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lobao, L., and C. Stofferahn. 2008. The community effects of industrialized farming: Social science research and challenges to corporate farming laws. Agriculture and Human Values 25(2): 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mather, C., and B. Kenny. 2005. The difficulties of ‘emerging markets’: Cross-continental investment in the South African dairy sector. In Cross-continental food chains, ed. N. Fold, and B. Pritchard, 179–190. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. McMichael, P., and H. Friedmann. 2007. Situating the ‘retailing revolution’. In Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods, ed. D. Burch, and G. Lawrence, 291–319. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira, P. 2008. Population health needs beyond ratifying the Kyoto protocol: A look at occupational deprivation. Rural and Remote Health Journal (online). Accessed 28 Aug 2012.
  39. Popke, J. 2006. Geography and ethics: Everyday mediations through care and consumption. Progress in Human Geography 30(4): 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sayre, N. 2011. Commentary: Scale, rent, and symbolic capital: Political economy and emerging rural landscapes. Geoforum 76: 437–439.Google Scholar
  41. Simms, A. 2007. Tescopoly: How one shop came out on top and why it matters. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, K., and K. Lyons. 2012. Negotiating organic, fair and ethical trade: Lessons from smallholders in Uganda and Kenya. In Food system failure, ed. C. Rosin, P. Stock, and H. Campbell, 182–202. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, B., N. Abel, J. Anderies, and P. Ryan. 2009. Resiliance, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecology and Society 14(1):12. htpp:// Accessed 7 Aug 2010.
  44. White, M. 2007. Food access and obesity. Obesity Reviews 8(Suppl 1): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright, W. 2005. Fields of cultural contradictions: Lessons from the tobacco patch. Agriculture and Human Values 22(4): 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations