Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 71–83 | Cite as

Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious

Article

Abstract

In this paper we argue that over the last 40 years the context of agronomic research in the developing world has changed significantly. Three main changes are identified: the neoliberal turn in economic and social policy and the rise to prominence of the participation and environmental agendas. These changes have opened up new spaces for contestation around the goals, priorities, methods, results and recommendations of agronomic research. We suggest that this dynamic of contestation is having important effects on how agronomic research is planned, managed, implemented, evaluated and used, and is therefore worthy of detailed study. This is particularly so at a time when food security, rising food prices and the potential impacts of climate change on agriculture are in the policy spotlight. We outline a research agenda that should help illuminate the drivers, dynamics and impacts of this new ‘political agronomy’.

Keywords

Conservation agriculture SRI Agricultural research Political ecology 

References

  1. Akram-Lodhi, A.H. 2007. Land reform, rural social relations and the peasantry. Journal of Agrarian Change 7: 554–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almekinders, C.J.M., and A. Elings. 2001. Collaboration of farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122: 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri, M.A. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 93: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J.R. 1998. Selected policy issues in international agricultural research: On striving for international public goods in an era of donor fatigue. World Development 26: 1149–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, J., and K.E. Giller. 2012. On heretics and God’s blanket salesmen: contested claims for Conservation Agriculture and the politics of its promotion in African smallholder farming. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ashby, J.A., A.R. Braun, T. Gracia, M.P. Guerrero, L.A. Hernandez, C.A. Quiros, and J.A. Roa. 2000. Investing in Farmers as Researchers: Experiences with Local Agricultural Research Committees in Latin America. Cali: CIAT.Google Scholar
  7. Bardwell, L.V. 1991. Problem-framing: A perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environmental Management 15: 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, R.H. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, E. 1981. Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Agenda for Action. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Biggs, S.D. 1995. Farming systems research and rural poverty: Relationships between context and content. Agricultural Systems 47: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bijman, J. 2001. Restructuring the life science companies. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 44–45: 26–30.Google Scholar
  12. Bonneuil, C. 2000. Development as experiment: Science and state building in late colonial and postcolonial Africa, 1930–1970. Osiris 15: 258–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks, S., and S.E. Johnson-Beebout. 2012. Contestation as continuity? Biofortification research and the CGIAR. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Busch, L. 1981. Science and agricultural development. In Science and Agricultural Development. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Buttel, F.H. 2005. Ever since Hightower: The politics of agricultural research activism in the molecular age. Agriculture and Human Values 22: 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buttel, F.H., and L. Busch. 1988. The public agricultural research system at the crossroads. Agricultural History 62: 303–324.Google Scholar
  17. Byerlee, D. 1998. The search for a new paradigm for the development of national agricultural research systems. World Development 26: 1049–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byerlee, D., and G.E. Alex. 1998. Strengthening National Agricultural Research Systems: Policy Issues and Good Practice. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. CGIAR. 2003. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Annual General Meeting and Stakeholder Meeting, October 29–30 (2003, Nairobi, Kenya: Summary Record of Proceedings Washington,. DC: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  21. CGIAR. 2006. A Strategic Framework for Engagement Between the CGIAR and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs)—The CGIAR Perspective.. Washington, DC: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Secretariat.Google Scholar
  22. Chambers, R. 1993. Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural Development. London: IT Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Chambers, R. 1986. Normal Professionalism, New Paradigms and Development. Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
  24. Chambers, R. 1997. Whose Reality Counts: Putting the Last First. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Chambers, R., and B.P. Ghildyal. 1985. Agricultural-research for resource-poor farmers: The farmer-first-and-last model. Agricultural Administration 20: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L.A. Thrupp (eds.). 1989. Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: IT Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Chivenge, P.P., H.K. Murwira, K.E. Giller, P. Mapfumo, and J. Six. 2007. Long-term impact of reduced tillage and residue management on soil carbon stabilization: Implications for conservation agriculture on contrasting soils. Soil & Tillage Research 94: 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chong, D., and J.N. Druckman. 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Collinson, M.P. (ed.). 2000. A History of Farming Systems Research In A History of Farming Systems Research. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
  30. Conway, G. 1985. Agroecosystem analysis. Agricultural Administration 20: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cook, K.A. 1989. The environmental era of U.S. agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44: 362–366.Google Scholar
  32. Cooke, B. 2003. A new continuity with colonial administration: Participation in development management. Third World Quarterly 24: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cooke, B., and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? In Participation: The New Tyranny?, ed. B. Cooke, and U. Kothari. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Cornwall, A. 2003. Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development 31: 1325–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dale, C. 1981. Agricultural research as state intervention. In Science and Agricultural Development, ed. L. Busch. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun & Co.Google Scholar
  36. Dalton, T.J., and R.G. Guei. 2003. Productivity gains from rice genetic enhancements in West Africa: Countries and ecologies. World Development 31: 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Daviter, F. 2007. Policy framing in the European union. Journal of European Public Policy 14: 654–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dawe, D., R. Robertson, and L. Unnevehr. 2002. Golden rice: What role could it play in alleviation of vitamin A deficiency? Food Policy 27: 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Jager, A., D. Onduru, M.S. van Wijk, J. Vlaming, and G.N. Gachini. 2001. Assessing sustainability of low-external-input farm management systems with the nutrient monitoring approach: A case study in Kenya. Agricultural Systems 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. de Janvry, A., and E. Sadoulet. 2010. Agriculture for development in Africa: Business-as-usual or new departures? Journal of African Economies 19: ii7–ii39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. de Lattre-Gasquet, M., and J.F. Merlet. 1996. Agricultural research networks in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of the situation and its consequences. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 9: 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dobermann, A. 2004. A critical assessment of the system of rice intensification (SRI). Agricultural Systems 79: 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and K. Amanor. 2012. Anthropogenic dark earths and Africa: A political agronomy of research disjunctures. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Farmer, B.H. 1981. The “Green Revolution” in South Asia. Geography 66: 202–207.Google Scholar
  46. Feldman, Shelley, and Stephen Biggs. 2012. The politics of international assessments: the IAASTD process, reception and significance. Journal of Agrarian Change 12: 144–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Foresight. 2011. The future of food and farming: Challenges and choices for global sustainability. Final Project Report. The Government Office for Science: London.Google Scholar
  48. Franke, R., and B. Chasin. 1980. Seeds of Famine: Ecological Destitution and the Development Dilemma in the West African Sahel. Montclair/New York: Allanheld, Osmun/Universe Books.Google Scholar
  49. Freire, P. 2007. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  50. Gardner, B., and W. Lesser. 2003. International agricultural research as a global public good. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 692–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. GFAR. 2011. The GCARD Road Map: Transforming Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) Systems for Global Impact. Rome: GFAR/FAO.Google Scholar
  52. Giller, K.E., M. Corbeels, J. Nyamangara, B. Triomphe, F. Affholder, E. Scopel, and P. Tittonell. 2011. A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems. Field Crops Research 124: 468–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Giller, K.E., E. Witter, M. Corbeels, and P. Tittonell. 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research 114: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Glover, D. 2010. The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor. Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Goldberger, J.R. 2008. Non-governmental organizations, strategic bridge building, and the “scientization” of organic agriculture in Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Govaerts, B., N. Verhulst, A. Castellanos-Navarrete, K.D. Sayre, J. Dixon, and L. Dendooven. 2009. Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: Between myth and farmer reality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 28: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gow, D., and J. Vansant. 1983. Beyond the rhetoric of rural development participation: How can it be done? World Development 11: 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gowing, J.W., and M. Palmer. 2008. Sustainable agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa: The case for a paradigm shift in land husbandry. Soil Use and Management 24: 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Greenland, D.J., E.T. Craswell, and M. Dagg. 1987. International networks and their potential contribution to crop and soil management research. Outlook on Agriculture 16: 42–50.Google Scholar
  60. Hadwiger, D.F. 1982. The Politics of Agricultural Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  61. Hall, A., G. Bockett, S. Taylor, M.V.K. Sivamohan, and N. Clark. 2001. Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development 29: 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harwood, R.R., F. Place, A.H. Kassam, and H.M. Gregersen. 2006. International public goods through integrated natural resources management research in CGIAR partnerships. Experimental Agriculture 42: 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Haverkort, B., J. van der Kamp, and A. Waters-Bayer. 1991. Joining Farmers’ Experiments: Experiences in Participatory Technology Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Hobbs, P.R. 2007. Conservation agriculture: What is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hobbs, P.R., K. Sayre, and R. Gupta. 2008. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363: 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jansen, Kees, and Aarti Gupta. 2009. Anticipating the future: `Biotechnology for the poor’ as unrealized promise? Futures 41: 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jayne, T.S., J. Govereh, A. Mwanaumo, J.K. Nyoro, and A. Chapoto. 2002. False promise or false premise? The experience of food and input market reform in Eastern and Southern Africa. World Development 30: 1967–1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jenrich, M. 2011. Potential of precision conservation agriculture as a means of increasing productivity and incomes for smallholder farmers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66: 171A–174A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kassam, A., T. Friedrich, F. Shaxson, and J. Pretty. 2009. The spread of conservation agriculture: Justification, sustainability and uptake. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7: 292–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Keeley, J., and I. Scoones. 2003. Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa. Earthscan: London & Sterling VA.Google Scholar
  71. Lal, R. 2009. Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 28: 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Latif, M.A., M.R. Islam, M.Y. Ali, and M.A. Saeque. 2005. Validation of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 93: 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Leach, M., I. Scoones, and I. Stirling. 2010. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  74. Leal, PabloAlejandro. 2007. Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice 17: 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lele, U., and C. Gerrard. 2003. Global public goods, global programs, and global policies: Some initial findings from a World Bank evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 686–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Loevinsohn, M.E. 1987. Insecticide use and increased mortality in rural Central Luzan, Philippines. Lancet 8546: 1359–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Low, A.R.C. 1994. Environmental and economic dilemmas for farm-households in Africa: When low-input sustainable agriculture translates to high-cost unsustainable livelihoods. Environmental Conservation 21: 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Maat, H., and D. Glover. 2012. Alternative configurations of agronomic experimentation. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Maredia, M.K., D. Byerlee, and P. Pee. 2000. Impacts of food crop improvement research: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy 25: 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Maredia, M.K., and D.A. Raitzer. 2010. Estimating overall returns to international agricultural research in Africa through benefit-cost analysis: A “best-evidence” approach. Agricultural Economics 41: 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Marongwe, L.S., K. Kwazira, M. Jenrich, C. Thierfelder, A. Kassam, and T. Friedrich. 2011. An African success: The case of conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McDonald, A.J., P.R. Hobbs, and S.J. Riha. 2006. Does the system of rice intensification outperform conventional best management? A synopsis of the empirical record. Field Crops Research 96: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McDonald, A.J., P.R. Hobbs, and S.J. Riha. 2008. Stubborn facts: Still no evidence that the system of rice intensification out-yields best management practices (BMPs) beyond Madagascar. Field Crops Research 108: 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McGuire, ShawnJ. 2008. Path-dependency in plant breeding: Challenges facing participatory reforms in the Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Program. Agricultural Systems 96: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McIntyre, B.D., H.R. Herren, J. Wakhungu, and R.T. Watson. 2009. Agriculture at a Crossroads: IAASTD Global Report. In Agriculture at a Crossroads: IAASTD Global Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  86. McMichael, P. 2008. Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please. Journal of Agrarian Change 8: 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Moock, J. (ed.). 1986. Understanding Africa’s Rural Households and Farming Systems. In Understanding Africa’s Rural Households and Farming Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  88. Moser, C.M., and C.B. Barrett. 2003. The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low external-input technology: The case of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Systems 76: 1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Naseem, A., D.J. Spielman, and S.W. Omamo. 2010. Private-sector investment in R&D: A review of policy options to promote its growth in developing-country agriculture. Agribusiness 26: 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nkala, P., N. Mango, M. Corbeels, G.J. Veldwisch, and J. Huising. 2011. The conundrum of conservation agriculture and livelihoods in Southern Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 5520–5528.Google Scholar
  91. Okali, C., J. Sumberg, and J. Farrington. 1994. Farmer Participatory Research: Rhetoric and Reality. London: IT Publications.Google Scholar
  92. Orr, A. 2003. Integrated pest management for resource-poor African farmers: Is the Emperor naked? World Development 31: 831–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Orr, A., and J.M. Ritchie. 2004. Learning from failure: Smallholder farming systems and IPM in Malawi. Agricultural Systems 79: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Orr, S., J. Sumberg, O. Erenstein, and A. Oswald. 2008. Funding international agricultural research and the need to be noticed: A case study of NERICA rice. Outlook on Agriculture 37: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Owenya, M.Z., W.L. Mariki, J. Kienzle, T. Friedrich, and A. Kassam. 2011. Conservation agriculture (CA) in Tanzania: The case of the Mwangaza B CA farmer field school (FFS), Rhotia Village, Karatu District, Arusha. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 663–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pearse, A. 1980. Seeds of Plenty, Seeds of Want: Social and Economic Implications of the Green Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  98. Perez, C., C. Roncoli, C. Neely, and J.L. Steiner. 2007. Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges. Agricultural Systems 94: 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pfeiffer, WolfgangH, and Bonnie McClafferty. 2007. HarvestPlus: Breeding crops for better nutrition. Crop Science 47: S88–S105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Piepho, H.P. 1998. Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems—A review. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 180: 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pimentel, D., and M. Pimentel. 1990. Comment: Adverse environmental consequences of the Green Revolution. Population and Development Review 16: 329–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pingali, P., and M. Rosengrant. 1994. Confronting the Environmental Consequences of the Green Revolution in Asia. EPTD Discussion Paper No 2. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  103. Pistorius, R. 1997. Scientists, Plants and Politics: A History of the Plant Genetic Resources Movement. Rome: International Plant Genetics Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  104. Plucknett, D.L., and N.J.H. Smith. 1984. Networking in international agricultural research. Science 225: 989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Raitzer, D.A., and T.G. Kelley. 2008. Benefit-cost meta-analysis of investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR. Agricultural Systems 96: 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Raitzer, D., and G.W. Norton. 2009. Prioritizing Agricultural Research for Development: Experiences and Lessons. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Reij, C., and A. Waters-Bayer (eds.). 2001. Farmer Innovation in Africa: A Source of Inspiration for Agricultural Development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  108. Reijntes, C., B. Haverkort, and A. Waters-Bayer. 1992. Farming for the Future. An Introduction to Low-External-Input and Sustainable Agriculture. Leusden, NL: ILEIA.Google Scholar
  109. Richards, P. 1985. Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Production in West Africa. London: Hutchinson & Company.Google Scholar
  110. Roe, E.M. 1991. Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development. World Development 19: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ruttan, V. 1982. Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  112. Sandbrook, R. 1985. The Politics of Africa’s Economic Stagnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Satyanarayana, A., T.M. Thiyagarajan, and N. Uphoff. 2007. Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrigation Science 25: 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Scoones, I. 2009. The politics of global assessments: The case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Scoones, I., and J. Thompson (eds.). 1994. Beyond Farmer First: Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  116. Scoones, I., and J. Thompson (eds.). 2009. Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development.. London: Practical Action Publishing.Google Scholar
  117. Senthilkumar, K., P.S. Bindraban, T.M. Thiyagarajan, N. de Ridder, and K.E. Giller. 2008. Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: Yield gains and farmers’ (lack of) acceptance. Agricultural Systems 98: 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sheehy, J.E., S. Peng, A. Dobermann, P.L. Mitchell, A. Ferrer, J.C. Yang, Y.B. Zou, X.H. Zhong, and J.L. Huang. 2004. Fantastic yields in the system of rice intensification: fact or fallacy? Field Crops Research 88: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Shrum, Wesley, and Patricia Campion. 2000. Are scientists in developing countries isolated? Science Technology and Society 5: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Silici, L., P. Ndabe, T. Friedrich, and A. Kassam. 2011. Harnessing sustainability, resilience and productivity through conservation agriculture: The case of likoti in Lesotho. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sinha, S.K., and J. Talati. 2007. Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management 87: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Smith, MichaelB. 2001. Silence, Miss Carson!” science, Gender, and the reception of “Silent Spring. Feminist Studies 27: 733–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sperling, L., J.A. Ashby, M.E. Smith, E. Weltzien, and S. McGuire. 2001. A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results. Euphytica 122: 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sperling, L., and P. Berkowitz. 1994. Partners in Selection: Bean Breeders and Women Bean Experts in Rwanda. Washington DC: CGIAR.Google Scholar
  125. Spielman, D.J., F. Hartwich, and K. Grebmer. 2010. Public-private partnerships and developing-country agriculture: evidence from the international agricultural research system. Public Administration and Development 30: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Spielman, D.J., and R. Pandya-Lorch (eds.). 2009. Millions Fed: Proven Successes in Agricultural Development. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  127. Stoop, W.A., A. Adam, and A. Kassam. 2009. Comparing rice production systems: A challenge for agronomic research and for the dissemination of knowledge-intensive farming practices. Agricultural Water Management 96: 1491–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stoop, W.A., and A.H. Kassam. 2005. The SRI controversy: A response. Field Crops Research 91: 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Stoop, W.A., N. Uphoff, and A. Kassam. 2002. A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agricultural Systems 71: 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Streeten, P. 1987. Structural adjustment: A survey of the issues and options. World Development 15: 1469–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Sumberg, J. 2002. The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy 27: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Sumberg, J. 1998. Mixed farming in Africa: The search for order, the search for sustainability. Land Use Policy 15: 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sumberg, J. 2005. Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa. Food Policy 30: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sumberg, J., R. Irving, E. Adams, and J. Thompson. 2012a. Success making and success stories: agronomic research in the spotlight. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  135. Sumberg, J., C. Okali, and D. Reece. 2003. Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: Theoretical considerations. Agricultural Systems 76: 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sumberg, J., J. Thompson, and P. Woodhouse. 2012b. Contested agronomy: Agricultural research in a changing world. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  137. Tansey, G., and T. Rajotte (eds.). 2008. The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  138. Tatum, L.A. 1971. The southern corn leaf blight epidemic. Science 171: 1113–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Teubal, M. 2009. Agrarian reform and social movements in the age of globalization Latin America at the Dawn of the twenty-first century. Latin American Perspectives 36: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. The World Bank. 2007. Agriculture for Development: World Development Report 2008. Washington DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Thompson, J., and I. Scoones. 1994. Challenging the populist perspective: Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. Agriculture and Human Values 11: 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Tripp, R. 2005. Self-Sufficient Agriculture: Labour and Knowledge on Small-Scale Farming. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  143. Uphoff, N., A. Kassam, and W. Stoop. 2008. A critical assessment of a desk study comparing crop production systems: The example of the ‘system of rice intensification’ versus ‘best management practice’. Field Crops Research 108: 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Van Bueren, E.T.L., P.C. Struik, and E. Jacobsen. 2002. Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 50: 1–26.Google Scholar
  145. Van Huis, A., and F. Meerman. 1997. Can we make IPM work for resource-poor farmers in sub-Saharan Africa? International Journal of Pest Management 43: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Vanloqueren, G., and P.V. Baret. 2009. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy 38: 971–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. von Kaufmann, R. 2007. Integrated agricultural research for development: Contributing to the comprehensive Africa agricultural development programme (IAR4D in CAADP). In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. A. Bationo, B. Waswa, J. Kihara, and J. Kimetu. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  148. Weyland, K. 1996. Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development 31: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Wield, D.V., J. Chataway, and M. Bolo. 2010. Issues in the political economy of agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Agrarian Change 10: 342–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Williamson, J. 1993. Democracy and the Washington consensus. World Development 21: 1329–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Wolmer, W., and I. Scoones. 2000. The science of ‘civilized’ agriculture: the mixed farming discourse in Zimbabwe. African Affairs 99: 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Woodhouse, P. 2010. Beyond industrial agriculture? Some questions about farm size, productivity and sustainability. Journal of Agrarian Change 10: 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Woodhouse, P. 2012. Water in African agronomy. In Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, ed. James Sumberg, and John Thompson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Sumberg
    • 1
  • John Thompson
    • 1
  • Philip Woodhouse
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Development StudiesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.School of Environment and DevelopmentUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations