Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 441–454 | Cite as

The construction of an alternative quinoa economy: balancing solidarity, household needs, and profit in San Agustín, Bolivia

Article

Abstract

Quinoa farmers in San Agustín, Bolivia face the dilemma of producing for a growing international market while defending their community interests and resources, meeting their basic household needs, and making a profit. Farmers responded to a changing market in the 1970s by creating committees in defense of quinoa and farmer cooperatives to represent their interests and maximize economic returns. Today farmer cooperatives offer high, stable prices, politically represent farmers, and are major quinoa exporters, but intermediaries continue to play an important role in the local economy. Meanwhile, some farmers rebuff the national cooperatives and intermediaries in favor of a denomination of origin and closer association with local cooperatives. This article, based on 4 months of ethnographic research, explores the reasons for the continued presence of intermediaries on the market landscape and how farmers have worked to create a quinoa economy embedded with fair trade values. Farmers demand stable prices, flexible standards, provision of services, and promises of maintaining the distinctive qualities of San Agustín quinoa. They frame their trades in economic, utility, and solidarity terms to reflect their livelihood strategies, farming capabilities, and personal concepts of fair trade. Meanwhile cooperatives, development initiatives, and intermediaries each argue that their particular buying practices allow farmers to attain household goods, credit, and cash for food and economic security.

Keywords

Quinoa Quinua real Bolivia Fair trade Intermediaries Denomination of origin Alternative development Value 

References

  1. Appadurai, A. 1986. Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In The social life of things, ed. A. Appadurai, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arce, A. 2009. Living in times of solidarity: Fair trade and the fractured life worlds of Guatemalan coffee farmers. Journal of International Development 21: 1031–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon, C., V.E. Mendez, S.R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J.A. Fox. 2008. Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods, and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barham, E. 2003. Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borja, R., and D. Soraide. 2007. Estudio del Consumo de la Quinua en la Ciudad de Potosí. Oruro: Fundación AUTAPO.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, S., and A.Valenzuela Zapata. 2009. Geographical indications, terroir, and socioeconomic and ecological sustainability: The case of Tequila. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, B. 2010. Cooperatives for “fair globalization”? Indigenous people, cooperatives, and corporate social responsibility in the Brazilian Amazon. Latin American Perspectives 37: 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cáceres, Z., A. Carimentrand, and J. Wilkinson. 2007. Fair trade and quinoa from the southern Bolivian Altiplano. In Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization, ed. L. Raynolds, D. Murray, and J. Wilkinson, 180–199. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Carlos-Aroni, J., M. Cayoja, and M.A. Laime. 2009. Situación Actual al 2008 de la Quinua Real en el Altiplano Sur de Bolivia. Oruro: Fundación AUTAPO.Google Scholar
  10. Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. 2009. Fighting like a community: Andean civil society in an era of Indian uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Colloredo-Mansfeld, R., and J. Antrosio. 2009. Economic clusters or cultural commons? The limits of competition-driven development in the Ecuadorian Andes. Latin American Research Review 44: 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, I. 2004. Follow the thing: Papaya. Antipode 36(4): 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daviron, B., and S. Ponte. 2005. The coffee paradox: Global markets, commodity trade, and the elusive promise of development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  14. Egoavil-Arce, M. 1983. Comercialización de la Quinua en el Altiplano Peruano. Lima: Universidad Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar
  15. Felix, D. 2008. Culture durable du quinoa en Bolivie: Pratiques individuelles et règles communautaires. La Paz: Ruralter.Google Scholar
  16. Felix, D., and C. Villca. 2009. Quinua y Territorio. La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
  17. Healy, K. 2001. Llamas, weavings, and organic chocolate: Multicultural grassroots development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  18. IICA (Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura). 1991. Estudio de Mercado y Comercialización de la Quinua Real de Bolivia. La Paz: IICA de Bolivia.Google Scholar
  19. Jaffee, D. 2007. Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Laguna, P. 2011. Mallas y Flujos: Acción Colectiva, Cambio Social, Quinua y Desarrollo Regional Indígena en los Andes Bolivianos. Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  21. Laguna, P. 2008. Grano Pequeño, Mercado Pequeño, Grandes Apuestas: Estudiando los Límites de la Regulación Estatal Francesa del Comercio Justo a Partir del Caso de la Quinua. Paper Presented at the Third Colloque International sur le Commerce Equitable. Montpellier: CIRAD. 14–16 May 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. 2008. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. León, G., H. Valdéz, and V.H. Vásquez. 2003. Mercado Kantuta: ¿Un Mercado Campesino?. La Paz: PIEB.Google Scholar
  24. Long, N. 2001. Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyon, S., and M. Moberg. 2010. Fair trade and social justice: Global ethnographies. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mauss, M. 2002. The gift: The form and reason for gift exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  27. McDonald, J. 1997. Privatizing the private family farmer: NAFTA and the transformation of the Mexican dairy sector. Human Organization 56(3): 321–332.Google Scholar
  28. Montoyo Choque, J.C. 2007. Estimación del Consumo de la Quinua en la Ciudad de Oruro. Oruro: Fundación AUTAPO.Google Scholar
  29. Ofstehage, A. 2011. Nusta Juira’s gift of quinoa: Peasants, trademarks, and intermediaries in the transformation of a Bolivian commodity economy. Anthropology of Work Review 32(2): 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ofstehage, A. 2010. The gift of the middleman: An ethnography of quinoa trading networks in Los Lipez of Bolivia. Master’s Thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  31. Pinget, K., and D. van der Heyden. 1994. Estudio de Comercialización de la Quinua en el Mercado Nacional: Alternativas para las Organizaciones de Productores. Potosí: PROQUIPO.Google Scholar
  32. Quisbert, J., and R. Valleur. 2009. Estudio del Impacto del Comercio Justo de la Quinua en el Altiplano Sur de Bolivia. La Paz: Agronomes et Vétérinaires sans Frontières.Google Scholar
  33. Risselborn, D. 2011. Market power of middlemen: The case of quinoa in Bolivia. Master’s Thesis, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  34. Romero, S. 2011. Quinoa’s global success creates quandary at home. Manhattan: New York Times.Google Scholar
  35. Roseberry, W. 1995. Introduction. In Coffee, society, and power in Latin America, ed. W. Roseberry, L. Gudmundson, and M. Samper Kutschbach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rojas, W., J.L. Soto, and E. Carrasco. 2004. Study on the social, environmental, and economic impacts of quinoa promotion in Bolivia. La Paz: PROINPA Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Ton, G., and J. Bijman. 2006. The role of producer organizations in the process of developing an integrated supply chain: Experiences from quinoa chain development in Bolivia. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on management in agrifood chains and networks, Ede, The Netherlands, 31 May–2 June 2006.Google Scholar
  38. Valdez, C., and F. Bajak. 2011. Quinoa’s popularity boon to Bolivians. Durham, NC: The Herald Sun.Google Scholar
  39. Vásquez-León, M. 2010. Free markets and fair trade, collective livelihood struggles, and the cooperative model: Two case studies from Paraguay. Latin American Perspectives 37: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations