Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 467–480 | Cite as

What are the odds of being an organic or local food shopper? Multivariate analysis of US food shopper lifestyle segments

Article

Abstract

The growth in organic and local foods consumption has been examined using two different approaches to identify characteristics and motivations of food shoppers: market segmentation and economic models using multivariate analysis. The former approach, based on Means-end Chain theory, examines how intrinsic characteristics of foods affect food choices. The latter microeconomic approach examines economic constraints and extrinsic factors. This study demonstrates value in combining the two approaches to generate better empirical predictions of who buys organic and local food. It also supports a broader theoretical framework to explain behavior in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Using US data, an adaptation of the Food Related Lifestyle model yields four consumer lifestyles segmented by intrinsic motivations related to food. Each consumer segment exhibits distinct organic and local foods consumption behaviors. A multinomial logit model is estimated to examine the probability of being in one of these four groups as a function of extrinsic variables and economic constraints. In support of Alphabet theory and Regulatory Focus theory, we find that inclusion of extrinsic factors improves prediction of behavior and the ability to explain why they buy organic and local foods. The extrinsic variables that significantly increase the probability of being in a particular consumer food lifestyle segment include: environmental concerns, health practices, race, the presence of a farmers’ market, and to a lesser degree, family composition and income. We also find regulatory focus is most pronounced among the most active organic and local food shoppers.

Keywords

Alphabet theory Consumer behavior Lifestyle segmentation 

Abbreviation

FRL

Food related lifestyle

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Research Initiative of the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, USDA, Grant #2002–01772 and is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank all who participated in the survey.

References

  1. Adams, D.C., and M.J. Salois. 2010. Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(4): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre, J.A. 2007. The farmer’s market organic consumer of Costa Rica. British Food Journal 109: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R.P., and P.A. Dabholkar. 2000. Discursive psychology: An alternative conceptual foundation to means–end chain theory. Psychology and Marketing 17(7): 535–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, S., K.E. Thompson, and J. Engelken. 2004. Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK. European Journal of Marketing 38(8): 995–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Boer, J., C.T. Hoogland, and J.J. Boersema. 2007. Towards more sustainable food choices: Value priorities and motivational orientations. Food Quality and Preference 18: 985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsø, K., and K.G. Grunert. 1995. Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: Food-related life style. Advances in Consumer Research 22: 475–480.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsø, K., J. Scholderer, and K.G. Grunert. 2004. Closing the gap between values and behavior: A means-end theory of lifestyle. Journal of Business Research 57(6): 665–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckley, M., C. Cowan, M. McCarthy, and C. O’Sullivan. 2005. The convenience consumer and food-related lifestyles in Great Britain. Journal of Food Product Marketing 11(3): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowe, E., and E.T. Higgins. 1997. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69(2): 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, A., A.J. Titterington, and C. Cochrane. 1995. Who buys organic food? A profile of the purchasers of organic food in Northern Ireland. British Food Journal 97: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitri, C., and C. Greene. 2002. Recent growth patterns in the US organic foods market. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. AIB777.Google Scholar
  13. Eastwood, D.B., J.R. Brooker, and M.D. Gray. 1999. Location and other market attributes affecting farmers’ market patronage: The case of Tennessee. Journal of Food Distribution Research 30(1): 63–72.Google Scholar
  14. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. 2004. Irrigation and water use. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/WaterUse/. Accessed 15 October 2010.
  15. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. 2005. Land use, value and management: Overview. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/LandUse/. Accessed 15 October 2010.
  16. Goldman, B.J., and K.L. Clancy. 1991. A survey of organic produce purchases and related attitudes of food cooperative shoppers. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Govindasamy, R., J. Italia, and A. Adelaja. 2002. Farmers’ markets: consumer trends, preferences, and characteristics. Journal of Extension 40. http://www.joe.org/joe/2002feburary/rb6.html. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  18. Grunert, K.G., K. Brunsø, and S. Bisp. 1997. Food-related life-style: Development of a cross-culturally valid instrument for market surveillance. In Values, lifestyles and psychographics, ed. Lynn R. Kahle, and Larry Chiagouris, 337–354. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Guagnano, G.A., P.C. Stern, and T. Dietz. 1995. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 27: 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunter, B., and A. Furnham. 1992. Consumer profiles: An introduction to psychographics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Harper, G.C., and A. Makatouni. 2002. Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal 104(3/4/5): 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins, E.T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist 52(12): 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoogland, C.T., J. de Boer, and J.J. Boersema. 2007. Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on product standards? Appetite 49: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hokanen, P., B. Verplanken, and S.O. Olsen. 2006. Ethical values and motives driving food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(5): 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jekanowski, M.D., D.R. Williams II, and W.A. Schiek. 2000. Consumers’ willingness to purchase locally produced agricultural products: An analysis of an Indiana survey. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(8): 43–53.Google Scholar
  26. Katsaras, N., P. Wolfson, J. Kinsey, and B. Senauer. 2001. Data mining: A segmentation analysis of US grocery shoppers. Working paper 01-01. St. Paul, MN: The Retail Food Industry Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  27. Kezis, A., T. Gwebu, S. Peavey, and H. Cheng. 1998. A study of consumers at a small farmers’ market in Maine: results from a 1995 survey. Journal of Food Distribution Research 29: 91–99.Google Scholar
  28. Kolodinsky, J., and L. Pelch. 1997. Factors influencing the decision to join a community supported agriculture (CSA) farm. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 10(2/3): 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kollmus, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3): 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. La Trobe, H. 2001. Farmers’ markets: Consuming local rural produce. International Journal of Consumer Studies 25(3): 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levav, J., R. Kivetz, and C.K. Cho. 2010. Motivational compatibility and choice conflict. Journal of Consumer Research 37: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lockeretz, W. 1986. Urban consumers’ attitudes towards locally grown produce. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1(2): 83–88.Google Scholar
  33. Lusk, J.L., and B.C. Briggeman. 2009. Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(1): 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madison Area CSA Coalition. 2011. CSA health insurance rebate. http://www.csacoalition.org/our-work/community-programs/csa-insurance-rebate/. Accessed 15 April 2011.
  35. Nie, C., and L. Zepeda. 2011. Lifestyle segmentation of US food shoppers to examine organic and local food consumption. Appetite 57: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nijmeijer, M., A. Worsley, and B. Astil. 2004. An exploration of the relationships between lifestyle and vegetable consumption. British Food Journal 106(7): 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NPD Group. 2009. NPD reports “better for you” foods to grow significantly over the next decade. Port Washington, NY: The NPD Group, Inc. http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_090707a.html. Accessed 10 November 2009.
  38. Onianwa, O., G. Wheelock, and M. Mojica. 2005. Determinants of farmer-to-consumer direct-market shoppers. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(1): 130–134.Google Scholar
  39. Organic Trade Association. 2010. Industry statistics and projected growth. Green Field, MA: Organic Trade Association. http://www.ota.com/organic/mt/business.html. Accessed 6 October 2010.
  40. O’Sullivan, C., J. Scholderer, and C. Cowan. 2005. Measurement equivalence of the food related lifestyle instrument (FRL) in Ireland and Great Britain. Food Quality and Preference 16: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pérez-Cueto, F.J.A., W. Verbeke, M.D. de Barcellos, O. Kehagia, G. Chryssochoidis, J. Scholderer, and K.G. Grunert. 2010. Food-related lifestyles and their association to obesity in five European countries. Appetite 54: 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pierce, J.C., M.A.E. Steger, B.S. Steel, and N.P. Lovrich. 1992. Citizens, political communication and interest groups: A study of environmental organizations in Canada and the United States. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. Roininen, K., A. Arvola, and L. Lähteenmäki. 2006. Exploring consumers’ perceptions of local food with two different techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference 17(1): 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholderer, J., K. Brunsø, L. Bredahl, and K.G. Grunert. 2004. Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles (FRL) instrument within Western Europe. Appetite 42: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G.A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. A value-belief norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 6(2): 81–97.Google Scholar
  46. Storstad, O., and H. Bjørkhaug. 2003. Foundations of production and consumption of organic food in Norway. Agriculture and Human Values 20: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson, G.D., and J. Kidwell. 1998. Explaining the choice of organic produce: Cosmetic defects, prices, and consumer preferences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(2): 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Timmons, D., and Q. Wang. 2010. Direct food sales in the US: Evidence from state and county-level data. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34: 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tregear, A., J.B. Dent, and M.J. McGregor. 1994. The demand for organically-grown produce. British Food Journal 96: 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vyncke, P. 2002. Lifestyle segmentation: From attitudes, interests and opinions, to values, aesthetic styles, life visions and media preferences. European Journal of Communication 17(4): 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weinstein, N.D. 1988. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology 7(4): 355–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wier, M., and C. Calverly. 2002. Market potential for organic foods in Europe. British Food Journal 104(1): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Willer, H., and M. Yussefi. 2004. The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends. Bonn, Germany: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. http://orgprints.org/00002555/. Accessed 15 October 2004.
  54. Wolf, M.M., A. Spittler, and J. Ahern. 2005. A profile of farmers’ market consumers and the perceived advantages of produce sold at farmers’ markets. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(1): 192–201.Google Scholar
  55. Xu, J., K.D. Kochanek, S.L. Murphy, and B. Tejada-Vera. 2010. Deaths: Final data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports 58(19). Hyattsville, MD, USA: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm. Accessed 15 October 2010.
  56. Zepeda, L., H.-S. Chang, and C. Leviten-Reid. 2006. Organic food demand: A focus group study involving Caucasian and African-American shoppers. Agriculture and Human Values 23(3): 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zepeda, L., and D. Deal. 2009. Organic and local consumer behaviour: Alphabet theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33: 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zepeda, L., and C. Leviten-Reid. 2004. Consumers’ views on local food. Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(3): 1–6.Google Scholar
  59. Zepeda, L., and J. Li. 2006. Who buys local food? Journal of Food Distribution Research 37(3): 1–11.Google Scholar
  60. Zepeda, L., and J. Li. 2007. Characteristics of organic food shoppers. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics 39(1): 17–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Consumer ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations