Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 321–332 | Cite as

You can know your school and feed it too: Vermont farmers’ motivations and distribution practices in direct sales to school food services

  • David Conner
  • Benjamin King
  • Jane Kolodinsky
  • Erin Roche
  • Christopher Koliba
  • Amy Trubek
Article

Abstract

Farm to School (FTS) programs are increasingly popular as methods to teach students about food, nutrition, and agriculture by connecting students with the sources of the food that they eat. They may also provide opportunity for farmers seeking to diversify market channels. Food service buyers in FTS programs often choose to procure food for school meals directly from farmers. The distribution practices required for such direct procurement often bring significant transaction costs for both school food service professionals and farmers. Analysis of data from a survey of Vermont farmers who sell directly to school food services explores farmers’ motivations and distribution practices in these partnerships. A two-step cluster analysis procedure characterizes farmers’ motivations along a continuum between market-based and socially embedded values. Further bivariate analysis shows that farmers who are motivated most by market-based values are significantly associated with distribution practices that facilitate sales to school food services. Implications for technical assistance to facilitate these sales are discussed.

Keywords

Farm to School Local food Farmer motivations Food distribution Vermont 

Abbreviations

FTS

Farm to School

NSLP

National School Lunch Program

VAAFM

Vermont Agency of Agriculture Food and Markets

VT FEED

Vermont Food Education Every Day

References

  1. Allen, P., and J. Guthman. 2006. From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alreck, P.L., and R.B. Settle. 2004. The survey research handbook. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series in Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  3. Bagdonis, J.M., C.C. Hinrichs, and K.A. Schafft. 2009. The emergence and framing of farm-to-school initiatives: Civic engagement, health and local agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkenkamp, J. 2006. Making the farm/school connection: Opportunities and barriers to greater use of locally-grown produce in public schools. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  5. Block, F. 1990. Postindustrial possibilities: A critique of economic discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Center for Food and Justice. 2010. http://www.farmtoschool.org. Accessed 10 May 2010.
  7. Conner, D., B. King, C. Koliba, J. Kolodinsky, and A. Trubek. 2011a. Mapping farm to school networks: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 6: 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conner, D., A. Nowak, J. Berkenkamp, G. Feenstra, J. Van Soelen Kim, T. Liquori, and M. Hamm. 2011b. Value chains and sustainable procurement in large school districts: Scholar and practitioner efforts to foster partnerships. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1(4): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croom, E. 2005. Farm to school programs as leverage points to changing the school food system. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  10. Derwingson, A. 2008. Lunchtime! Next steps for farm to school programs in Oregon. Terminal Project Paper, Department of Planning, Public Policy & Management. University of Oregon. http://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/jspui/bitstream/1794/8644/1/Derwingson%20Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  11. Graham, H., G. Feenstra, A.M. Evans, and S. Zidenberg-Cherr. 2004. Davis school program supports life-long healthy eating habits in children. California Agriculture 58(4): 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haase, M., A. Azuma, R. Gottlieb, and M. Vallianatos. 2004. Fresh from the farm and into the classroom. Los Angeles: Center for Food and Justice, Urban and Environmental Policy Institute, Occidental College. http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/cfj/publications/Fresh_From_the_farm.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  13. Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16(3): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IBM SPSS. 2009. Statistical package for the social sciences. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  15. Izumi, B.T., K. Alaimo, and M.W. Hamm. 2010a. Farm-to-school programs: Perspectives of school food service professionals. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 42(2): 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Izumi, B.T., O.S. Rostant, M.J. Moss, and M.W. Hamm. 2006. Results from the 2004 Michigan farm-to-school survey. Journal of School Health 76(5): 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Izumi, B.T., D.W. Wright, and M.W. Hamm. 2009. Farm to school programs: Exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks. Agriculture and Human Values 27(3): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Izumi, B.T., D.W. Wright, and M.W. Hamm. 2010b. Market diversification and social benefits: Motivations of farmers participating in farm to school programs. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4): 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshi, A., A.M. Azuma, and G. Feenstra. 2008. Do farm-to-school programs make a difference? Findings and future research needs. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3(2/3): 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi, A., and M. Beery. 2007. A growing movement: A decade of farm to school in California. Los Angeles: Center for Food and Justice, Urban and Environmental Policy Institute, Occidental College. http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/publications/a_growing_movement.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  21. Kantor, L.S. 2001. Community food security programs improve food access. FoodReview 24(1): 20–26.Google Scholar
  22. Kloppenburg, J., and N. Hassanein. 2006. From old school to reform school? Agriculture and Human Values 23: 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kloppenburg, J., D. Wubben, and M. Grunes. 2007. If you serve it, will they come? Farm-to-school lessons from the Wisconsin homegrown lunch project. Madison: Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  24. Kloppenburg, J., D. Wubben, and M. Grunes. 2008. Linking the land and the lunchroom: Lessons from the Wisconsin Homegrown Lunch Project. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3(4): 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorr, M. 1983. Cluster analysis for social scientists: Techniques for analyzing and simplifying complex blocks of data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Manly, B.F.J. 2005. Multivariate statistical methods: A primer. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  27. Minnesota School Nutrition Association and Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. 2008. Minnesota school foodservice director survey: Farm-to-school. Minneapolis: Minnesota School Nutrition Association and Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, K., and R. Sonnino. 2008. The school food revolution: Public food and the challenge of sustainable development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, J., M. Briggs, and S. Zidenberg-Cherr. 2000. School-based gardens can teach kids healthier eating habits. California Agriculture 54(5): 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Farm to School Network, Community Food Security Coalition, and School Food Focus. 2009. Nourishing the nation one tray at a time: Farm to school initiatives in the child nutrition reauthorization. http://www.foodsecurity.org/NourishingtheNation-OneTrayataTime.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2011.
  31. Ratcliffe, M.M., and H.C. Smith. 2007. Results from the 2007 survey of school food service providers in oregon. Portland State University.Google Scholar
  32. Ryan, J. 2006. Impact assessment of Vermont Farm2School program: Prepared for the Vermont FEED partnership. Richmond: Development Cycles.Google Scholar
  33. Sage, C. 2003. Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative ‘good food’ networks in South West Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saris, W.E., and I.N. Gallhofer. 2007. Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  35. Schafft, K.A., C.C. Hinrichs, and J.D. Bloom. 2010. Pennsylvania farm-to-school programs and the articulation of local context. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 5(1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strohbehn, C.H., and M.B. Gregoire. 2001. Innovations in school food purchasing: Connecting to local food. Journal of Child Nutrition and Management 25(2): 62–65.Google Scholar
  37. Tropp, D., and S. Olowolayemo. 2000. How local farmers and school food service buyers are building alliances: Lessons learned from the USDA small farm/school meals workshop, May 1, 2000. Washington, DC: USDA Agricultural Marketing Service.Google Scholar
  38. USDA Food and Nutrition Service. National School Lunch Program Fact Sheet. 2009. http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/AboutLunch/NSLPFactSheet.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2009.
  39. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). 2007. Table 5. Net cash farm income of operations and operators: 2007 and 2002 (National Data). http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/index.asp. Accessed 9 Sept 2011.
  40. Vermont Food Education Every Day (VT FEED). 2004. Analysis of school food and local purchasing in Vermont schools 2003–2004. http://www.vtfeed.org/sites/default/files/staff-files/site-downloads/FEED%20Economic%20Analysis.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2011.
  41. Vermont Food Education Every Day (VT FEED). 2011. Vermont farm to school fact sheet. http://www.vtfeed.org/sites/default/files/staff-files/Farm%20to%20School%20Month/Farm%20to%20School%20Month%20Sample%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2011.
  42. Vermont Food Education Every Day (VT FEED). no date. What is Vermont FEED. http://www.vtfeed.org/about. Accessed 27 Jan 2011.
  43. Vogt, R.A., and L. Kaiser. 2008. Still a time to act: A review of institutional marketing of regionally-grown food. Agriculture and Human Values 25(2): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weisberg, H.F. 2005. The total survey error approach: A guide to the new science of survey research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Conner
    • 1
  • Benjamin King
    • 1
  • Jane Kolodinsky
    • 1
  • Erin Roche
    • 1
  • Christopher Koliba
    • 1
  • Amy Trubek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Community Development and Applied EconomicsUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition and Food SciencesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations