Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 347–359 | Cite as

Food sovereignty in US food movements: radical visions and neoliberal constraints

  • Alison Hope AlkonEmail author
  • Teresa Marie Mares


Although the concept of food sovereignty is rooted in International Peasant Movements across the global south, activists have recently called for the adoption of this framework among low-income communities of color in the urban United States. This paper investigates on-the-ground processes through which food sovereignty articulates with the work of food justice and community food security activists in Oakland, California, and Seattle, Washington. In Oakland, we analyze a farmers market that seeks to connect black farmers to low-income consumers. In Seattle, we attend to the experiences of displaced immigrant farmers from Latin America and their efforts to address their food needs following migration. In both cases, we find that US based projects were constrained by broader forces of neoliberalism that remained unrecognized by local activists. In Oakland, despite a desire to create a local food system led by marginalized African Americans, emphasis on providing green jobs in agriculture led activists to take a market-based approach that kept local food out of the economic grasp of food-insecure neighborhood residents. In Seattle, the marginalization of the immense agroecological knowledge of Latino/an immigrant farmers rendered local food projects less inclusive and capable of transformative change. Taken together, these very different cases suggest that a shift towards food sovereignty necessitates a broad acknowledgement of and resistance to neoliberalism.


Food sovereignty Food justice Community food security Social movements Neoliberalism 


  1. Anderson, M. 2008. Rights-based food systems and the goals of food system reform. Agriculture and Human Values 25(4): 59–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, P. 1999. Reweaving the food security net: Mediating entitlement and entrepreneurship. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, P., and Julie Guthman. 2006. From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values 23(4): 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balassa, B. 1982. The theory of economic integration. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  7. Bello, W. 2008. How to manufacture a global food crisis. Development 51: 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breitbach, C. 2007. The geographies of a more just food system: Building landscapes for social reproduction. Landscape Research 32(5): 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. Varigated neoliberalisation: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10(2): 182–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burawoy, M., A. Burton, A. Arnett Ferguson, and K.J. Fox. 1991. Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burch, D., and J. Lawrence. 2009. Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chappell, M.J., and L.A. LaValle. 2011. Food Security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 28(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chossudovsky, M. 2003. The globalization of poverty and the new world order. Quebec: Global Research.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, J. 2004. Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy 33(1): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Community Food Security Coalition. n.d. What is community food security? Community Food Security Coalition Website. Accessed 24 June 2010.
  16. Del Clarke Jr., V.J., and C.L. Jocoy. 2008. Intervention: Neoliberal subjectivities, the “New” homelessness, and struggles over spaces of/in the city. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 40(2): 192–199.Google Scholar
  17. Desmarais, A.A. 2007. La Via Campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gilbert, J., G. Sharp, and S. Felin. 2002. The loss and persistence of black-owned farms and farmland: A review of the research literature and its implications. Southern Rural Sociology 18: 1–30.Google Scholar
  19. Glasser, B., and A. Struass. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategy for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. Gold, M.E. 1996. The privatization of prisons. Urban Law Review 28: 359–380.Google Scholar
  21. Gottlieb, R., and A. Fisher. 1996. First feed the face: Environmental justice and community food security. Antipode 28(2): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39: 1171–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guthman, J. 2011. Weighing in: Obesity, food justice and the limits of capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harper, A., A. Shattuck, E. Holt-Gimenez, A. Alkon, and F. Lambrick. 2009. Food policy councils: Lessons learned. Oakland, CA: Food First.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heany, J., and T. Hayes. n.d. Redlining food: How to ensure community food security. Accessed 5 Jan 2012.
  27. Holt-Gimenez, E. 2011. Food Security, food justice, or food sovereignty? Crises, food movements, and regime change. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 309–330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Holt-Gimenez, E. 2006. Campesino a campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  29. Krahmann, E. 2010. States, citizens and the privatization of security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawson, L. 2005. City bountiful: A century of community gardening in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. McClintock, N. 2011. From industrial garden to food desert: Unearthing the root structure of urban agriculture in Oakland, California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 89–120. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McMichael, P. 2005. Global development and the corporate food regime. In New directions in the sociology of global development (Research in rural sociology and development, Volume 11), ed. F.H. Buttel, and P. McMichael, 265–299. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Mo’ Better Foods. N.d. Accessed 2005–2008.Google Scholar
  35. Peck, J. 2010. Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3): 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pudup, M.B. 2008. It takes a garden: Cultivating citizen-subjects in organic gardens. Geoforum 39: 1228–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosset, P. 2008. Food sovereignty and the contemporary food crisis. Development 51(4): 460–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schiavoni, C. 2009. The global struggle for food sovereignty: From Nyéléni to New York. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3): 682–689.Google Scholar
  41. Shah, A. 2010. A Primer on neoliberalism. Global Issues. Available from Accessed 5 Jan 2011.
  42. Shiva, V. 2005. Earth democracy. New York: South End Press.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, W.C., Carlos H. Acuña, and E. Gamarra. 1994. Democracy, markets, and structural reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  44. Stephenson, N. 2003. Interrupting neo-liberal subjectivities. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 17(2): 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Via Campesina. 2009. Nyéléni declaration. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3): 673–676.Google Scholar
  46. Vorley, W.T. 2001. The chains of agriculture: Sustainability and the restructuring of agri-food markets. WSSD Paper. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  47. Williamson, J. 1990. What Washington means by policy reform. In Latin American adjustment: How much has happened?, ed. John Williamson. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  48. Wittman, H. 2009. Interview: Paul Nicholson, La Via Campesina. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3): 676–682.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of the PacificSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations