Agriculture and Human Values

, 26:309 | Cite as

Breaking new ground in food regime theory: corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the ‘food from somewhere’ regime?

  • Hugh CampbellEmail author


Early food regimes literature tended to concentrate on the global scale analysis of implicitly negative trends in global food relations. In recent years, early food regimes authors like Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael have begun to consider the sites of resistance, difference and opportunity that have been emerging around, and into contestation with, new food regime relations. This paper examines the emerging global-scale governance mechanism of environmental food auditing—particularly those being promoted by supermarkets and other large food retailers—as an important new dynamic in our understanding of the politics and potentials of food regimes. Commencing with an examination of Friedmann’s corporate environmental food regime, two key dynamics are identified as being pivotal in the rise and decline of global-scale regimes: securing social legitimacy for food relations and the importance of ecological dynamics in global food relations. By extending McMichael’s notion of ‘Food from Nowhere’ versus ‘Food from Somewhere’, the paper interrogates the emergence of a cluster of relations that comprise ‘Food from Somewhere’ and examines whether this cluster of relations has the potential to change some of the constituent ecological dynamics of food regimes. These ecological dynamics have historically been problematic, amply demonstrating Marx’s metabolic rift as the early food regimes solidified relationships between ‘ecologies at a distance’. By using socio-ecological resilience theory, ‘Food from Somewhere’ is characterized as having denser ecological feedbacks and a more complex information flow in comparison to the invisibility and distanciation characterizing earlier regimes as well as contemporary ‘Food from Nowhere’. The conclusion of this article is that while ‘Food from Somewhere’ does provide one site of opportunity for changing some key food relations and ecologies, the social legitimacy of this new form of food relations does rely on the ongoing existence of the opposite, more regressive, pole of world food relations. The key question for resolving this tension appears to be whether new food relations can open up spaces for future, more ecologically connected, global-scale food relations.


Food regimes Agri-food theory Resilience Feedbacks Audit Governance Green capitalism 



This paper emerged and was refined as part of a stimulating dialogue that emerged between a group of scholars over the last 2 years. I would particularly like to acknowledge the detailed commentary and constructive engagement of Jane Dixon, Philip McMichael, Harriet Friedmann, Farshad Araghi, Ruth Beilin, Chris Rosin, Julia Haggerty and three very useful anonymous reviews on an earlier draft of this paper.


  1. Allison, H.E., and R.J. Hobbs. 2004. Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecology and Society 9 (1): 3.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.D. 2007. Resilience and agrifood systems knowledge. Paper presented to agriculture, food and human values conference, May 30–June 3, in Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
  3. Araghi, F. 2003. Food regimes and the production of value: Some methodological issues. The Journal of Peasant Studies 30 (2): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Beilin, R. 2007. Landscape with voices: Reflecting on resilience on farms in the ‘heartbreak hills’, Strzelecki ranges. Local-Global 4: 141–160.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., and D. Jolly. 2001. Adapting to climate change: Social-ecological resilience in a Canadian Western Arctic Community. Conservation Ecology 5 (2): 18.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., and C. Seixas. 2005. Building resilience in lagoon social-ecological systems: A local-level perspective. Ecosystems 8: 967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, H. 2005. The rise and rise of EurepGAP: The European (re)invention of colonial food relations? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 13 (2): 6–19.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, H. 2006. Consultation, commerce and contemporary agri-food systems: Ethical engagement of new systems of governance under reflexive modernity. Integrated Assessment Journal 6 (2): 117–136.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, H., and R. Le Heron. 2007. Supermarkets, producers and audit technologies: The constitutive micro-politics of food, legitimacy and governance. Chapter 6 in Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods, ed. G. Lawrence and D. Burch. London, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell. H., C. McLeod, and C. Rosin. 2006. Auditing sustainability: The impact of EUREP-GAP on organic exporting from New Zealand. Chapter 10 in Organic agriculture: A sociological perspective, ed. G. Holt and M. Reed. Oxon: CABI.Google Scholar
  12. Cronon, W. 1991. Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. 2001. Late Victorian holocausts: El Nino famines and the making of the third world. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedmann, H. 1993. After Midas’s feast. In Food for the future: Conditions, contradictions of sustainability, ed. P. Allen. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Friedmann, H. 2005. From colonialism to green capitalism: Social movements and the emergence of food regimes. In New directions in the sociology of global development, ed. F. Buttel, and P. McMichael. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system. Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedmann, H., and A. McNair. 2008. Whose rules rule? Contested projects to certify ‘local production for distant consumers’. Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2 & 3): 408–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guthman, J. 2000. Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haggerty, J., and H. Campbell. 2007. Feedback loops and intensive agriculture in New Zealand: Neo-liberalism, animal bodies and farmer subjectivities. Paper presented to the Association of American Geographers conference, April 21st, in San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Larner, W., and R. Le Heron. 2004. Global benchmarking: Participating ‘at a distance’ in the globalizing economy. In Global governmentality: Governing international spaces, ed. W. Larner, and W. Walters. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lawrence, G., and D. Burch (eds.). 2007. Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods. London, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Le Heron, R. 2003. Cr(eat)ing food futures: Reflections on food governance issues in New Zealand’s agri-food sector. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Heron, R. 2005. Re-constituting New Zealand’s agri-food chains for international competition. In Cross-continental food commodity chains, ed. B. Pritchard, and N. Folds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Le Heron, R., and M. Roche. 1996. Eco-commodity systems: Historical geographies of context, articulation and embeddedness under capitalism. In Globalisation and agri-food restructuring: Perspectives from the Australasia region, ed. D. Burch, R. Rickson, and G. Lawrence. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  27. MacLeod, C., and H. Moller. 2006. Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of sustainable land use. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 115: 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McMichael, P.D. 1993. World food system restructuring under a GATT regime. Political Geography 12 (3): 198–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McMichael, P.D. 2000a. The power of food. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMichael, P.D. 2000b. A global interpretation of the rise of the East Asian agro-food import complex. World Development 28 (3): 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McMichael, P.D. 2002. La Restructuration Globale des Systems Agro-Alimentaires. Mondes en Development 30 (117): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMichael, P.D. 2005. Global development and the corporate food regime. In New directions in the sociology of global development. Research in rural sociology and development, vol. 11, 269–303. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. McNeill, J. 2000. Something new under the sun: An environmental history of the 20th century. London, UK: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  34. Milestad, R., and I. Darnhofer. 2003. Building farm resilience: The prospects and challenges of organic farming. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22 (3): 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, J.W. 2000. Environmental crises and the metabolic rift in world-historical perspective. Organization and Environment 13: 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pollan, M. 2006. The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Rosin, C., H. Campbell, and L. Hunt. 2007. Audit me this! Kiwifruit producer uptake of the EurepGAP audit system in New Zealand. In Agri-food commodity chains and globalising networks, ed. C. Stringer, and R. Le Heron. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Stuart, A., and H. Campbell. 2004. ‘Business as usual’: Contextualising the GM/organic conflict within the history of New Zealand agriculture. New Zealand Sociology 19 (2): 220–239.Google Scholar
  39. Sundkvist, A., R. Milestad, and A.-M. Jansson. 2005. On the importance of tightening feedback loops for sustainable development of food systems. Food Policy 30: 224–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker, B., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kitzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9 (2): 5.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, B., and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations