Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building resilience to climate change in rain-fed agricultural enterprises: An integrated property planning tool

  • In the Field
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to a drying climate, an integrated property planning tool was developed over three years to help landowners make better use of available rainfall. A sequence was identified which indicated how parts of each property are affected by soil moisture limitations. The sequence was combined with soil properties to indicate targeted strategies for each location aimed to improve soil moisture availability, biomass utilisation, and long-term viability of the farm or ranching enterprise. As a result of training of land owners and operators in use of this tool, 97% of participants indicated that they have begun or intend to make changes in land management; 78% are intending to make three or more substantial changes; and 91% felt better prepared for the impacts of climate change. The key to the success of this technique is that it identifies critical sustainable production drivers in a simple plan format and offers tailored management options which can address more variable climate conditions. The integrated planning tool has application as a driver of climate change adaptation in agricultural regions where farm units contain substantial landscape variation and seasonal rainfall is frequently limiting to production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Brower, D., A. Clowes, and B. Thompson (eds.). 1999. Physical property planning. Paterson, Australia: C.B. Alexander Agricultural College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C.P., R. Chapman, P.L. Singleton, and P.R. Thom. 2000. Shallow mechanical loosening of a soil under dairy cattle grazing: Effects on soil and pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleugh, H. 2003. Trees for shelter: A guide to using windbreaks on Australian farms. Canberra, Australia: Rural Industry Research and Development Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, R.C., W. Wang, S. Mann, and B. Henry. 2004. Soil organic matter decline and restoration. Natural Resource Management 7 (2): 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow, J.J., J.E. Amonette, and V.L. Bailey. 2006. Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration. Climate Change 80: 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys M., B. Clements, and C. Edwards. 2004. Landscan: Practical landscape and soil test interpretation workshops for sustainable farm management. Proceedings SuperSoil 2004, Australia and New Zealand Soils Conference. University of Sydney, Australia. Available at http://www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/supersoil2004/s2/oral/2103_keysm.htm. Accessed 27 Feb 2008.

  • Lodge, G.M., S.R. Murphy, and S. Harden. 2003. Effects of grazing and management on herbage mass persistence, animal production and soil water content of native pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M., N. Stenekes, and J. Russell. 2008. Climate risk and industry adaptation. Document 13917. Canberra, Australia: Bureau of Rural Sciences, Australian Government.

  • Moore, A.D., J.R. Donnelly, and M. Freer. 1997. GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian Grazing Enterprises III. Pasture growth and soil moisture submodels, and the GrassGro DSS. Agricultural Systems 55: 535–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, K. 2007. Climate change in Australia. Technical report. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.

  • Rawls, W.J., Y.A. Pachepsky, J.C. Ritchie, T.M. Sobecki, and H. Bloodwort. 2003. The effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116: 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling, G.P., D. Wheeler, E.T. Vesely, and L.A. Schipper. 2006. What is soil carbon worth? Journal of Environmental Quality 35: 548–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steed, G.R., T.A. Reeves, and S.T. Willatt. 1987. Effects of deep ripping and liming on soil water deficits, sorptivity and penetrometer resistance. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 701–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., J. Sims, and J. Walcott. 2006. Farming profitably in a changing climate: A risk management approach. Canberra, Australia: Dept. of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taddese, G., M.A. Mohamed Saleem, and W. Ayalneh. 2002. Effect of grazing on physical properties of cracking and self mulching Vertisol. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42: 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.E., B.P. Christy, A.M. Ridley, A.E. Okom, R. Murphy, W.H. Johnston, D.L. Michalk, P. Sanford, M.R. McCaskill, I.R. Johnson, D.L. Garden, D.L. Hall, and M.H. Andrew. 2003. SGS Water Theme: Influence of soil, pasture type and management on water use in grazing systems across the high rainfall zone of southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 907–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

“Landscan,” a training package authored by Mike Keys, provided a foundation for the development of the extension program outlined in this paper. Funding was provided by the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory H. Reid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reid, G.H. Building resilience to climate change in rain-fed agricultural enterprises: An integrated property planning tool. Agric Hum Values 26, 391–397 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9168-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9168-3

Keywords

Navigation