Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: A comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Certification and labeling initiatives that seek to enhance environmental and social sustainability are growing rapidly. This article analyzes the expansion of these private regulatory efforts in the coffee sector. We compare the five major third-party certifications – the Organic, Fair Trade, Rainforest Alliance, Utz Kapeh, and Shade/Bird Friendly initiatives – outlining and contrasting their governance structures, environmental and social standards, and market positions. We argue that certifications that seek to raise ecological and social expectations are likely to be increasingly challenged by those that seek to simply uphold current standards. The vulnerability of these initiatives to market pressures highlights the need for private regulation to work in tandem with public regulation in enhancing social and environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algra J. (2004). “Tendencias del mercado y situación actual de los cafés especiales.” (Market tendencies and current situation of specialty coffees), Powerpoint presentation. Montelimar, Nicaragua: Twin Trading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon C. (2005). Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua? World Development 33(3): 497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham E. (2002). Towards a theory of values-based labeling. Agriculture and Human Values 19(4): 349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos S. (2000). Globalization and ethical trade: What are the implications for development? Journal of International Development 12(4): 559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray D. B., J. L. Plaza Sánchez, E. Contreras Murphy (2002). Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: Lessons for eco-labeling initiatives. Society and Natural Resources 15(5): 429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch L., C. Bain (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology 69(3): 321–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B., G. Auld, D. Newsom (2004). Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • CCCC (Common Code for the Coffee Community) (2005). CCCC homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.sustainable-coffee.net

  • Dankers C., P. Liu (2003). Environmental and Social Standards, Certification and Labelling for Cash Crops. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Daviron B., S. Ponte (2005). The Coffee Paradox: Commodity Trade and the Elusive Promise of Development. London, UK: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan C., J. Humphrey (2000). Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: The impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry. Journal of Development Studies 37(2): 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbenshade J. (2004). Monitoring Sweatshops. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • FLO (Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International) (2005). FLO homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.fairtrade.net

  • FLO (Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International) (2006). Delivering opportunities: Annual report 2004/2005. Accessed on March 15, 2006 at www.fairtrade.net

  • Freidberg S. E. (2003). Cleaning up down south: Supermarkets, ethical trade and African horticulture. Social & Cultural Geography 4(1): 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G. (1994). “The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains”. In Gereffi G. and M. Korzeniewicz (eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism (pp. 95–122). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger

  • Gereffi G., R. Garcia-Johnson, E. Sasser (2001). The NGO-industrial complex. Foreign Policy 125: 56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G., J. Humphrey, T. Sturgeon (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D. (2001). Sustainable Coffee Survey of the North American Specialty Coffee Industry. Long Beach, California: Specialty Coffee Association of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D., F. J. Koekoek (2003). The State of Sustainable Coffee: A Study of Twelve Major Markets. London, UK: International Coffee Organization and International Institute for Sustainable Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D., S. Ponte (2005). Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy 30: 284–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold D. (2000). The future of sustainable coffee. Gourmet Retailer 21(11): 48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins V., G. Lawrence (eds.) (2005). Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation. London, UK: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes A. (2001). Global commodity networks, ethical trade and governmentality: Organizing business responsibility in the Kenyan cut flower industry. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(4): 390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements) (2005). IFOAM homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.ifoam.org

  • Jessop B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism. Economy and Society 24(3): 307–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck M., K. Sikkink (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilcher L., M. Schäfer, T. Richter, P. van den Berge, J. Milz, R. Foppen, A. Theunissen (2002). Organic Coffee, Cocoa and Tea: Market, Certification and Production Information for Producers and International Trading Companies. Frick, Switzerland: FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein N. (1999). No Logo. New York, NY: Picador Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Konefal J., M. Mascarenhas, M. Hatanaka (2005). Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values 22(3): 291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin B., D. Giovannucci, P. Varangis (2004). Coffee Markets: New Paradigms in Global Supply and Demand. Washington, DC: The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T., A. Flynn, M. Harrison (2000). Consuming Interests: The Social Provision of Foods. New York, NY: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch J., T. Marsden, J. Banks (2000). Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography 76(2): 107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray D., L. T. Raynolds, P. Taylor (2003). One Cup at a Time: Poverty Alleviation and Fair Trade Coffee in Latin America. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutersbaugh T. (2005). Fighting standards with standards: Harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environment and Planning A 37: 2033–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutersbaugh T. (2002). The number is the beast: A political economy of organic-coffee certification and producer unionism. Environment and Planning A 34(7): 1165–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCA (National Coffee Association of USA) (2004). National Coffee Drinking Trends. New York, NY: National Coffee Association of USA

  • O’Rourke D. (2003). Outsourcing regulation: Analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor Standards and monitoring. The Policy Studies Journal 31(1): 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott S. and T. Dietsch (2005). Bird-friendly and Fair Trade Certification: Linking Consumers to Sustainability. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center

  • Ponte S. (2004). Standards and Sustainability in the Coffee Sector. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S. (2002). The ‚latte revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Development 30(7): 1099–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S., P. Gibbon (2005). Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and Society 34: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RA (Rainforest Alliance) (2005). Rainforest alliance homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.rainforest-alliance. org

  • Raynolds L. T. (2004). The globalization of organic agro-food networks. World Development 32(5): 725–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L. T. (2002). Consumer/producer links in fair trade coffee networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42(4): 404–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L. T. (2000). Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L. T., D. Murray, P. L. Taylor (2004). Fair trade coffee: Building producer capacity via global networks. Journal of International Development 16(8): 1109–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard M. C. (2005). Quality certification, regulation and power in fair trade. Journal of Rural Studies 21(4): 419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice R. A. (2001). Noble goals and challenging terrain: Organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global marketplace. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(1): 39–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCS (Scientific Certification Systems) (2005). Starbucks C.A.F.E. practices. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.scscertified.com/csrpurchasing/starbucks.html

  • Slob B., J. Oldenziel (2003). Coffee and Codes: Overview of Codes of Conduct and Ethical Trade Initiatives in the Coffee Sector. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SOMO (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations)

    Google Scholar 

  • SMBC (Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center) (2005). Bird friendly coffee. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.nationalzoo.si.edu/conservationandscience/migratorybirds/coffee

  • Talbot J. M. (2004). Grounds for Agreement: The Political Economy of the Coffee Commodity Chain. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J. G., P. J. Scharlin (2004). Smart Alliance: How a Global Corporation and Environmental Activists Transformed a Tarnished Brand. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot L. (1995). “Des marchés aux normes (Markets in norms)”. In Allaire G. and R. Boyer (eds.), Régulation et Conventions dans L’Agriculture et L’Agro-Alimentaire. (Regulation and conventions in agriculture and agro-foods) (pp. 33–51). Paris, France: INRA

  • TransFair USA (2005). TransFair USA homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.transfairusa.org

  • UK (Utz Kapeh) (2005a). Utz Kapeh homepage. Accessed on November 8, 2005 at www.utzkapeh.org

  • UK (Utz Kapeh) (2005b). Frequently asked questions about Utz Kapeh. Accessed on April 9, 2005 at www.utzkapeh.org/index.php?pageID=10#whatdiff

  • Vallejo N., P. Hauselmann (2004). Governance and Multi-Stakeholder Processes. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston M. (2002). NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics and International Affairs 16(1): 71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the representatives of the certification initiatives analyzed here for taking the time to explain their organization’s strategies and procedures. We also thank the Ford Foundation, Community and Resource Development Program for funding research that informs this analysis. The views presented here are the responsibility of the authors and should not be attributed to these individuals or organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sociology Department, Colorado State University, Clark Building, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Laura T. Raynolds, Douglas Murray & Andrew Heller

Authors
  1. Laura T. Raynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura T. Raynolds.

Additional information

Laura T. Raynolds is Professor of Sociology and Co-Director of the Center for Fair & Alternative Trade Studies (http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/cfats/index.html) at Colorado State University. She has published extensively on organic and Fair Trade certification and globalization and has an edited volume forthcoming, Raynolds, L. T., D. Murray, and J. Wilkinson (eds.) (2007) Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization. London: Routledge Press.

Douglas Murray is Professor of Sociology and Co-Director of the Center for Fair & Alternative Trade Studies at Colorado State University. His research and publications focus on global certification and regulatory initiatives, development, environment, and pesticide issues particularly in Latin America.

Andrew Heller is PhD Candidate in Sociology and student affiliate of the Center for Fair & Alternative Trade Studies at Colorado State University. He is researching the impacts of certification on Guatemalan small scale coffee producers for his dissertation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raynolds, L.T., Murray, D. & Heller, A. Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: A comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agric Hum Values 24, 147–163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9047-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9047-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation