Skip to main content

Capturing the Sustainability Agenda: Organic Foods and Media Discourses on Food Scares, Environment, Genetic Engineering, and Health

Abstract

This paper undertakes a content analysis of newspaper articles from Australia, the UK, and the US concerned with a variety of issues relevant to sustainable food and agriculture from 1996 to 2002. It then goes on to identify the various ways in which sustainability, organic food and agriculture, genetic engineering, genetically modified foods, and food safety are framed both in their own terms and in relation to each other. It finds that despite the many competing approaches to sustainability found in scientific and agricultural production discourses, media discourses tend to reduce this complexity to a straightforward conflict between organic and conventional foods. Despite regular reporting of viewpoints highly critical of organic food and agriculture, this binary opposition produces discourses in which organic foods are seen as more-or-less synonymous with safety, naturalness and nutrition, and their alternatives as artificial, threatening, and untrustworthy. Particularly controversial food-related issues such as genetic engineering, food scares, chemical residues, and regulatory failure are treated as part of the same problem to which organic food offers a trustworthy and easily understood solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Barr N., Cary J. (1992). Greening a Brown Land: The Australian Search for Sustainable Land Use Macmillan, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunton, R. (2000). “Turning tables on monster makers.” Courier Mail, August 5 (Section: Features): 30

  • Burns, G. (2002). “Europe shows little taste for U.S. biotech crops.” Chicago Tribune, October 30 (North Sports Final Edition, Section: Business): 1

  • Burros, M. (2000). “Green Britain: Organics have gained a mainstream following in England.” Chicago Tribune, October 18 (Northwest Edition, Section: Good Eating): 3B

  • Condor, B. (2002). “The market for organics blossoms.” Chicago Tribune, October 13 (Chicagoland Final Edition): Q1

  • Corner J., Richardson K. (1993). Environmental communication and the contingency of meaning: A research note. In Hansen A. (ed.), The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester University, Leicester, UK, pp 222–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. and J. Carr-Brown (1999). “What’s eating us?” Sunday Times (London), February 21 (Section: Features): np

  • Foucault M. (1980). Power/Knowledge Harvester, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, L. (1999). “Genetic stew boils in Brazil: South American giant struggles to decide whether to plant a genetically modified soy crop, a risky proposition.” Chicago Tribune, August 5 (Chicago Sports Final Edition, Section: News): 1

  • Guthman J.. (2000). Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman J.. (2004). The trouble with ‚organic lite’ in California: A rejoinder to the ‚conventionalisation’ debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44(3): 301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan J. (1995). Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Approach Routledge, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralambos M., van Krieken R., Smith P., Holborn M. (1996). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives, Australian Edition Longman, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, W. (1999). “Britons skirmish over genetically modified crops.” The New York Times, August 23 (Late Edition – Final): A3

  • Kaiser, R. (2002). “Farmers make a natural progression: Organic trend continues its strong growth.” Chicago Tribune, October 13 (Chicagoland Final Edition, Section: Business): 1

  • Kite, M. and M. Henderson (2002). “GM demonstrators are ignorant, says Blair.” The Times (London), May 24 (Section: Home News): np

  • Kleinman D., Kloppenburg J. jun (1991). Aiming for the discursive high ground: Monsanto and the biotechnology controversy. Sociological Forum 6(3): 427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg J. jun (1991). Alternative agriculture and the new biotechnologies. Science as Culture 4: 482–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law J. (1994). Organizing Modernity Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow L.. (1995). Agricultural biotechnology as clean surgical strike. Social Text 13(3): 161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S.. (2002). ‚The invisible mouth’: Mobilizing ‚the consumer’ in food production–consumption networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42(2): 278–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S., Lyons K., Lawrence G., Mummery K.. (2002). Eating ‚green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis 42(1): 20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M., Riechert B. (2000). Interest group strategies and journalistic norms: News media framing of environmental issues. In Allan S., Adam B., Carter C. (eds.) Environmental Risks and the Media. Routledge, London, UK, pp 45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, G. (2001). “The hidden agenda.” Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), January 21 (Section: Newsfront): 48

  • Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2003). Public Sentiment About Genetically Modified Food. Retrieved from http://pewagbiotech.org/polls/ on August 26, 2004

  • Pretty J. (1998). The Living Land: Agriculture, Food and Community Regeneration in Rural Europe. Earthscan, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, S. (2002). “It’s alive! It’s alive!” The New York Times, May 5 (Late Edition – Final, Section 4): 16

  • Teeman, T. (1999). “The most important issue of our time.” The Times (London), November 6 (Section: Features): np

  • Vanclay F. (1992). The social context of farmers’ adoption of environmentally sound farming practices. In Lawrence G., Vanclay F., Furze B. (eds.), Agriculture, Environment and Society: Contemporary Issues for Australia. Macmillan, Melbourne, Australia, pp 94–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Nell Salem for her invaluable assistance in the collection and processing of data for this paper, along with the rest of the Greening Foods research team, Professor Geoffrey Lawrence, and Dr. Kristen Lyons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stewart Lockie.

Additional information

Stewart Lockie is Associate Professor of Rural and Environmental Sociology and Associate Dean (Research) in the Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Health at Central Queensland University. His main research interests lie in the greening of food and agriculture, food commodity networks, and natural resource management. Recent co-edited books include Rurality Bites: The Social and Environmental Transformation of Rural Australia and Consuming Foods, Sustaining Environments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockie, S. Capturing the Sustainability Agenda: Organic Foods and Media Discourses on Food Scares, Environment, Genetic Engineering, and Health. Agric Hum Values 23, 313–323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9007-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9007-3

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • Discourse
  • Genetic engineering
  • Organic food