Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 435–450 | Cite as

Participatory Extension as Basis for the Work of Rural Extension Services in the Amazon

  • Benno PokornyEmail author
  • Guilhermina Cayres
  • Westphalen Nunes


Public extension services play a key role in the implementation of strategies for rural development based on the sustainable management of natural resources. However, the sector suffers from restricted financial and human resources. Using experiences from participatory action research, a strategy for rural extension in the Amazon was defined to increase the efficiency and the relevance of external support for local resource users. This strategy considered activities initiated and coordinated by local people. Short-term facilitation visits provided continuous external support for the purpose of establishing locally based planning and learning mechanisms. In collaboration with the municipality of Muaná in the Eastern Amazon, the strategy was tested in two traditional communities – Monte Moriat and Boa Esperança. Both communities recognized as most important the need to reduce their dependence on açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.), the principal source of food and income. This forest resource has been overexploited, seriously affecting açaí stands and diminishing the forest benefits fundamental for survival. Two local groups decided to raise chickens as a way to reduce nutritional problems and as an alternative source of income. Supported by monthly, short-term planning and evaluation visits, the groups managed to achieve significant progress in their endeavor. The groups identified (1) the control of decision-making and information, and (2) the absence of external obligations to be the greatest advantages of the development initiative. The study confirmed the potential of participatory strategies for public extension in the Amazon. Special attention was given to realistically define the role of forests for local development. However, drastic measures are necessary to smooth the way for real participation in governmental and non-governmental organizations acting in the Brazilian Amazon.


Brazilian Amazon Forest resources Participatory extension Rural development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agarwal, B. 2000“Conceptualising environmental collective action: Why gender matters”Cambridge Journal of Economics24283310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AGRITEX (Department of Agricultural, Technical and Extension Services of the Government of Zimbabwe) 1998.Learning Together Through Participatory Extension. A Guide to an Approach Developed in ZimbabweAGRITEXHarare, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral, N. M. 2002.Manejo florestal comunitário na Amazônia brasileira: análise da participação e valorização de saberes de grupos locais na implementação de três projetos pilotos (Community Forestry in the Brazilian Amazon: Analysis of Local Participation and Valorization of Local Knowledge During the Implementation of three Pilot ProjectsFederal University of Pará, (UFPA)Belém, BrazilMSc thesis.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, A. B. 1988“Use and management of native forests dominated by açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in the Amazon estuary”Advances in Economic Botany6144154Google Scholar
  5. Anau, N., R. Iwan, M. van Heist, G. Limberg, M. Sudana, and E. Wollenberg (2002). Negotiating more than Boundaries: Conflict, Power and Agreement Building in the Demarcation of Village Borders in Malinau. Technical Report. Phase I 1997–2001. ITTO Project PD 12/97 Rev.1 (F) Forest, Science and Sustainability: The Bulungan Model Forest. (pp. 131–156). Bogor, Indonesia, CIFORGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold, J. E. M. 1997Farms, Trees and Farmers. Reponses to agricultural intensificationEarthscan Publications LtdLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. BOND (British Overseas NGOs for Development) (2002). Annual Report 2001/2002. London, UK, BONDGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmen, R. 1996.Autonomous Development: Humanising the Landscape – An Excursion into Radical Thinking and PracticeZed BooksLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmen, R., Sobrado, M. 2000.A Future for the Excluded. Job Creation and Income Generation by the Poor, Clodomir Santos the Morais and the Organization WorkshopZed BooksLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers, R. 1997.Whose Reality Counts?Institute of Development StudiesLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Colfer, C., Brocklesby, M. A., Diaw, C., Etuge, P., Günter, M., Harwell, E., McDougall, C., Porro, N., Porro, R., Prabhu, R., Salim, A., Sardjono, M., Tchikangwa, B., Tiani, A., Waldley, R., Woelfel, J., Wollenberg, E. 1999The Bag (Basic Assessment Guide for Human Well-Being) Toolbox Series 5. BogorCIFORIndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Colfer, C. and Byron Y. (eds.) (2001). People Managing Forests: The Link Between Human Well Being and Sustainability. Resources for the Future. Washington DC, Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar
  13. Colfer, C. (ed.) (2004). The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community and Resource Management. Washington DC: Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar
  14. EMATER-Pará (Empresas Estaduais de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural) (2002). Relatório de atividades 2001 (Yearly Report 2001). Belém, Brazil, EMATERGoogle Scholar
  15. Freire, P. 1980.Conscientização: teoria e prática da libertação Uma introdução ao pensamento de Paulo Freire (Conscientização: theory and practice of liberation. An introduction in the thinking of Paulo Freire)3MORAESSão Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. 1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of StructurationPolity PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Guijt, I. 1998Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment of Sustainable Agriculture InitiativesIIEDLondon, UKS.A.R.L. Discussion Paper No. 1Google Scholar
  18. Hagmann, J.,, Chuma, E., Muriwira, K., Connolly, M., Ficarelli, P. 2002“Success factors in integrated natural resource management R&D: Lessons from practice”Conservation Ecology529Google Scholar
  19. Hecht, S., Cockburn, A. 1990Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the AmazonVersoLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, W. 1992.The Process of Participatory Rural Extension. Network Paper 14d Rural Development Forestry NetworkODILondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Holling,  C. S. eds. 1978Adaptive Environmental Assessment and ManagementJohn WileyNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development) (2003). Annual Report 2002. London, UK: EarthprintGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohlhepp, G. 1991“The destruction of the tropical rain forests in the Amazon region of Brazil. An analysis of the causes and the current situation”Applied Geography and Development3887109Google Scholar
  24. Mattei, L. (2001). “Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF): Concepção, abrangência e limites observados” (National program to strengthen smallholder agriculture: conception, scope and limitations). Proceedings of the IV Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Sistemas de Produção. March 19–23, 2001. Belém, Brazil. Accessed on November 24, 2002 at http:// Scholar
  25. Monteiro, R. 2001.Contextualização e perspectivas do PRODEX (Contextualization and perspectives of PRODEX)MMA/SCA/CEXBrasilia, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  26. Moran, E. F. eds. 1983The Dilemma of Amazonian DevelopmentWestview PressBoulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. 1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic ChangeBelknap PressLondon,, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Nunes, W. 2001Potencial florestal e suas restrições de uso comercial: o caso das comunidades ribeirinhas do alto rio Atuá, Muaná/Marajó/Pará (Potential and Restrictions for Commercializing Forest Products: The Case of the Riverside Communities Located at Upstream Atuá River, Muaná/Marajó/Pará). FCAP.Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias do Pará.Belém, BrazilMSc thesis.Google Scholar
  29. Pfaff, A. S. 1999“What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management372643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinedo-Vasquez, M.,, Zarin, J. D., Coffey, K., Padoch, C., Rabelo, F. 2001“Post-boom logging in Amazonia”Human Ecology29219239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pokorny, B., Steinbrenner, M. 2000Estudo sobre o uso de critérios de sustentabilidade para organização e análise de informações para Zoneamento (Study about the use of Sustainability Criteria for the Organization and Analysis of Information Related to Economic-Ecological Zoning).GTZ/SECTAMBelem, BrazilFinal Report.Google Scholar
  32. Pokorny, B.,, Cayres, G., Nunes, W., Segebart, D., Drude, R. 2003aPilot experiences with the implementation of adaptive co-management in ParáSabogal, C.Silva, J. N. M. eds. Integrated Management of Neotropical Rain Forests by Industries and CommunitiesEmbrapa/CIFORBelém, Brazil258280Google Scholar
  33. Pokorny, B.,, Cayres, G., Nunes, W. 2003b“Participatory analysis of heterogeneity,, an approach to consolidate collaborative initiatives at community level”Forests, Trees and Livelihoods13161175Google Scholar
  34. Pokorny, B.,, Cayres, G., Nunes, W. 2004Improving collaboration between outsiders and communities in the AmazonColfer, C. eds. The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community and Resource ManagementWashington DCResources for the Future229241Google Scholar
  35. Rogez, H. 2000.Açaí: preparo, composição e melhoramento da conservação (Açaí Palm: Preparation, Composition and Improvement of Conservation)UFPABelém, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruttan, V. W. 1997“Induced innovation. Evolutionary theory and path dependence. Sources of technical change”The Economic Journal10715201529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scholz, I. 2002.O Desenvolvimento de Instituições de Política Ambiental na Amazônia a partir de 1992: a contribuição do PPG7 (The development of institutions for environmental policy in the Amazon since 1992: a contribution to PPG7)Ministério do Meio AmbienteBraslia, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  38. Senge, M. P. 1990.The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning OrganizationCurrency DoubledayNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva R. (2002). Autodiagnóstico, planejamento local e extensão rural (Self-analysis, local planning and rural extension). In Secretaria Executiva de Agricultura do Pará (SEAP)/Prorenda Rural (ed.), Planejando o Desenvolvimento Local: Conceitos, Metodologias e Experiências (Planning of Local Development: Concepts, Methods And Experiences) (pp. 81–85). Belém, Brazil: SEAPGoogle Scholar
  40. Toni, F., Kaimowitz, D. 2003Municípios e Gestão Florestal na Amazônia (Governance of forest resources by municipalities in the Amazon)A. S. EditoresNatal, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  41. Tura, L. R. 2000Notas introdutórias sobre os fundos constitucionais de financiamento e sua configuração na região norte” (Introductory Notes about Constitutional Funds for Financing the North and its Configuration)Tura , L. R.Costa, F. A. eds. Campesinato e Estado an Amazônia (Smallholders in the Amazonas State)Brasília JurídicaBrasilia, Brazil2945Google Scholar
  42. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992). “Agenda 21: Deforestation.” In Final Report of the UNCED June 3–14, 1992. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. New York, New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  43. Uphoff, N. 1985Fitting projects to peopleCernea, M. eds. Putting People First. Sociological Variables in Rural DevelopmentOxford University PressOxford, UK447506Google Scholar
  44. Utting, P. 1993.Trees, People and Power: Social Dimensions of Deforestation and Forest Protection in Central AmericaEarthscan PublicationsLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  45. Walters, C. 1986.Adaptive Management of Renewable ResourcesMcMillan Publishing CompanyNew York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. World Bank,  1996.The World Bank Participation SourcebookWorld BankWashington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benno Pokorny
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guilhermina Cayres
    • 1
  • Westphalen Nunes
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for International Forestory ResearchRegional Office in BelémBelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations