Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate what is known about the demographic characteristics of Twitter influencers in academic medicine. We conducted a literature search and scoping review exploring the demographic characteristics of Twitter influencers in academic medicine. Included studies evaluated Twitter influence by any metric and reported associated demographic characteristics. There were no date or language restrictions. Data points included metrics of influence, demographics, and study characteristics. From 1656 records, thirteen met inclusion criteria. Influence was variably defined based on followers, measures of centrality, measures of engagement, or through third-party software. Studies were conducted at single time points and relied heavily on facial recognition for classification of sex or gender, with no studies exploring race as a variable of interest. Twitter influencers in academic medicine were found to be disproportionately male: significantly fewer influencers were female at all levels of professional status. Two studies identified more female influencers among trainee populations. Female users were less likely to develop influence based on followers, retweets, likes, or other measures of engagement at academic meetings, despite equal or greater representation at these meetings. Results on associations between Twitter influence and number of publications or h-index varied considerably. No included studies explored race or ethnicity in relation to Twitter influence, which presents a significant gap in the literature. Our findings highlight the need for larger, user-engaged studies of inequities related to social media influence in academic medicine, especially as social media is increasingly incorporated into academic portfolios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, J. S., Wong, N. Z., Symer, M., Eckenrode, G., Watkins, A., & Yeo, H. L. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities in promotion and retention of academic surgeons. The American Journal of Surgery, 216(4), 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.020
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Arora, A., Kaur, Y., Dossa, F., Nisenbaum, R., Little, D., & Baxter, N. N. (2020). Proportion of female speakers at academic medical conferences across multiple specialties and regions. JAMA Netw Open, 3(9)
Beroual, S., Shah, C., Knoll, M., Bahig, H., Lambert, C., & Taussky, D. (2020). A portrait of current radiation oncology twitter influencers. Cureus. Doi:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10838.
Cabrera, D., Vartabedian, B. S., Spinner, R. J., Jordan, B. L., Aase, L. A., & Timimi, F. K. (2017). More than likes and tweets: Creating social media portfolios for academic promotion and tenure. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 9(4), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-17-00171.1
Carr, P. L., Raj, A., Kaplan, S. E., Terrin, N., Breeze, J. L., & Freund, K. M. (2018). Gender differences in academic medicine: Retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Academic Medicine, 93(11), 1694–1699. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002146
Cawcutt, K. (2017). Twitter me this—can social media revolutionize academic medicine? Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 38(12), 1501–1502. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.242
Choo, E., Ranney, M., & Chan, T. (2015). Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.993371
Cochran, A., Freischlag, J. A., & Numann, P. (2013). Women, surgery, and Leadership: where we have been, where we are, where we are going. JAMA Surgery, 148(4), 312. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1706
Covidence Systematic Review Software Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at https://www.covidence.org (2021)
Demailly, Z., Brulard, G., Selim, J., Compère, V., Besnier, E., & Clavier, T. (2020). Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 124(3), e178–e184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.030
Elson, N. C., Le, D. T., Johnson, M. D., et al. (2020). Characteristics of general surgery social media influencers on twitter. The American Surgeon, 15, 0003134820951427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820951427
Elson, N. C., Le, D. T., Johnson, M. D., et al. (2021). Characteristics of general surgery social media influencers on twitter. The American Surgeon, 87(3), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820951427
Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in itrategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234
Enumah, Z. O., & Kernodle, A. B. (2021). Act justly and approach humbly: Minority trainees’ perspective on learning to study race in the surgical sciences. Annals of Surgery, 273(4), e127. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004673
Fang, D., Moy, E., Colburn, L., & Hurley, J. (2000). Racial and ethnic disparities in faculty promotion in academic medicine. Journal of The American Medical Association, 284(9), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.9.1085
Ginther, D. K., Schaffer, W. T., Schnell, J., et al. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science, 333(6045), 1015–1019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196783
Hanzel, T., Richards, J., Schwitters, P., et al. (2018). #DocsOnTwitter: How physicians use social media to build social capital. Hospital Topics, 96(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2017.1354558
Hong, F. C., Devine, P., McDonald, J. J., Cologne, K., & Brady, R. R. W. (2018). Social media engagement amongst 2017 colorectal surgery tripartite meeting attendees: Updates on contemporary social media use. Colorectal Disease, 20(5), O114–O118. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14058
Jagsi, R., Griffith, K. A., Stewart, A., Sambuco, D., DeCastro, R., & Ubel, P. A. (2012). Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. Journal of The American Medical Association, 307(22), 2410–2417. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.6183
Jena, A. B., Khullar, D., Ho, O., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2015). Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. Journal of The American Medical Association, 314(11), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10680
Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016). Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(9), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284
Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2006). Personal influence: the Part played by people in the Flow of Mass Communications (1st ed.). Routledge.
Knoll, M. A., Albert, A. A., Taussky, D., et al. (2020). Survey of twitter and social media use among US radiation oncologists. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 108(3), e434–e435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2519
Lett, L. A., Orji, W. U., & Sebro, R. (2018). Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0207274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207274
Lewis, J. D., Fane, K. E., Ingraham, A. M., et al. (2018). Expanding opportunities for professional development: Utilization of twitter by early career women in academic medicine and science. JMIR Medical Education, 4(2), e11140. https://doi.org/10.2196/11140
Logghe, H., Milam, L., Tully, N., & Salles, A. (2017). Without Interruptions: Does Twitter Level the Playing Field? Presented at: SAGES Annual Meeting;
Logghe, H. J., Selby, L. V., Boeck, M. A., Stamp, N. L., Chuen, J., & Jones, C. (2018). The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery. Journal of Surgical Research, 226, viii–xii. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.049.
Madriaga, H., Lerma, E., & Desai, T. (2019). Gender Disparities in Social Media and Medical Education.J Am Soc Nephrol. ;30.
McHugh, M. L. (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica. Doi:https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Messias, J., Vikatos, P., & Benevenuto, F. (2017). White, man, and highly followed: gender and race inequalities in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence. WI ’17. Association for Computing Machinery :266–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106472
Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y. Y., Onnela, J. P., & Rosenquist, J. (2011). Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users. ICWSM. ;5(1). Accessed January 31, 2021. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14168
Negrón, J. (2019). #EULAR2018: The annual European congress of rheumatology—a twitter hashtag analysis. Rheumatology International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04249-0
Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American society for information science and technology, 47(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701201
Riddell, J., Brown, A., Kovic, I., & Jauregui, J. (2017). Who are the most influential emergency physicians on twitter? Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(2), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.11.31299
Rodríguez, J. E., Campbell, K. M., & Pololi, L. H. (2015). Addressing disparities in academic medicine: What of the minority tax? BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0290-9
Schroeder, J., Dugdale, H. L., Radersma, R., et al. (2013). Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26(9), 2063–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12198
Sotudeh, H., Dehdarirad, T., & Freer, J. (2018). Gender differences in scientific productivity and visibility in core neurosurgery journals: Citations and social media metrics. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy003
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and Ten other Social web services. PLOS ONE, 8(5), e64841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Valle, L., Chu, F. I., Smith, M. A., Lee, P., & Raldow, A. (2019). Characterizing social media influencers in radiation oncology. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 105(1), E468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1436
Valsangkar, N., Fecher, A. M., Rozycki, G. S., et al. (2016). Understanding the barriers to hiring and promoting women in surgical subspecialties. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 223(2), 387-398e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.042
Weiss, A., Lee, K. C., Tapia, V., et al. (2014). Equity in surgical leadership for women: More work to do. The American Journal of Surgery, 208(3), 494–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.11.005
Zhu, J. M., Pelullo, A. P., Hassan, S., Siderowf, L., Merchant, R. M., & Werner, R. M. (2019). Gender differences in twitter use and influence among health policy and health services researchers. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(12), 1726. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4027
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Istl, A.C., Verma, S., Jawa, N.A. et al. Across the Twitter-verse: Is Twitter an equitable tool in academic medicine? A scoping review. Adv in Health Sci Educ 28, 997–1013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10201-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10201-y