Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From burden to benefit: a multi-site study of the impact of allied health work-based learning placements on patient care quality

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Allied health clinical placements take place within an increasingly overstretched health care system where demand for services often exceeds availability of resources. Within this environment, student placements are often perceived as an additional burden to an already overwhelmed workforce. This study explored whether the quality of patient care was enhanced when services were re-designed using a collaborative partnership approach to more purposefully integrate students into delivery of care. Using an embedded multiple case study design, data were collected through focus groups and interviews, patient experience surveys, and secondary administrative data sources. Cases were across physiotherapy and occupational therapy in six different hospital settings. Perception of care provided by students was viewed positively by all stakeholders, including patients. Perceived health outcomes of faster improvement of health condition, improved mobility and function identified through our qualitative findings were supported by quantitative service delivery markers such as increased therapy sessions, more patients being discharged home instead of to other care facilities and reduced length of stay. Health care providers and students alike perceived improvements in service efficiencies whilst maintaining high quality care. This study has provided preliminary evidence towards improved patient care when a partnering approach is adopted whereby students are intentionally integrated into services that otherwise might not have been delivered. Furthermore, it has shifted the associated narrative from students as additional burden to students as benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alison, J. A., McKeough, Z. J., Johnston, K., McNamara, R. J., Spencer, L. M., & Jenkins, S. C. (2017). Australian and N ew Z ealand P ulmonary R ehabilitation G uidelines. Respirology, 22(4), 800–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apke, T. L., Whalen, M., & Buford, J. (2020). Effects of student physical therapists on clinical instructor productivity across settings in an academic medical center. Physical Therapy, 100(2), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2016). Hip fracture care clinical care standard. Retrieved from Sydney: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/hip-fracture-clinical-care-standard

  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2019). The state of patient safety and quality in Australian hospitals. Retrieved from Sydney: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/state-patient-safety-and-quality-australian-hospitals-2019

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Australia's health 2018. Retrieved from Canberra: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/australias-health-2018/contents/table-of-contents

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Hospital activity. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/themes/hospital-activity

  • Barton, R., Corban, A., Herrli-Warner, L., McClain, E., Riehle, D., & Tinner, E. (2013). Role strain in occupational therapy fieldwork educators. Work, 44(3), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, J., & Pentland, D. (2020). A mapping review of models of practice education in allied health and social care professions. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(8), 488–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Co-participation: Affordance and engagement at work. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 92, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, E., Short, K., McAllister, L., & Nagarajan, S. (2019). The quantitative impact of placements on allied health time use and productivity in healthcare facilities: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broman, P., Tokolahi, E., Wilson, O. W., Haggie, M., Andersen, P., & Brownie, S. (2022). Patient outcomes from student-run health services: An integrative review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Health Information. (2017, 7 July 2022). Adult Admitted Patient Survey. Retrieved from https://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/nsw_patient_survey_program/adult_admitted_patient_survey

  • Doherty, M., Dyer, M., Wilson, E., & Russell-Thomas, D. (2020). Rehabilitation outcomes of an occupational therapy student-run free clinic for individuals with acquired brain injury. Journal of Allied Health, 49(1), 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). 23 Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 377.

  • Stroke Foundation. (2021). Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Retrieved from Melbourne: https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management

  • Hager, P. (2008). Learning and metaphors. Medical Teacher, 30(7), 679–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, M. P., Glickman, L. B., King, B. A., & Hollman, J. H. (2015). Evaluating physical therapist students’ clinical performance in acute care: A retrospective analysis comparing student-treated and staff-treated patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 29(2), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (2013). Teaching and learning in medical education: How theory can inform practice. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice, pp. 7–29.

  • Kemp, C., van Herwerden, L., Molloy, E., Kleve, S., Brimblecombe, J., Reidlinger, D., & Palermo, C. (2021). How do students offer value to organisations through work integrated learning? A qualitative study using Social Exchange Theory. Advances in Health Sciences Education, pp. 1–19.

  • Kleinsmann, M., & Valkenburg, R. (2008). Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design Studies, 29(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, L.-J., Fitzgerald, C., Costello, C., & Perkins, K. (2018). Allied health pre-entry student clinical placement capacity: Can it be sustained? Australian Health Review, 44(1), 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D. K., & Frith, P. A. (2003). The COPDX plan: Australian and New Zealand guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2003. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178(6), S1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., Lew, S., Woodward-Kron, R., Delany, C., Dodds, A., Lavercombe, M., & Hughson, J. (2018). Medical student clinical placements as sites of learning and contribution.

  • Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for mixed methods research (pp. 25–44). SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, G., McAllister, S., Morris, C., & Jennings, M. (2021). Moving beyond solutionism: Re-imagining placements through an activity systems lens. Medical Education, 55(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, N., & Cantillon, P. (2020). Why shouldn’t we do that on placement if we’re doing it in the real world? Differences between undergraduate and graduate identities in speech and language therapy. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(4), 781–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, S. R., Bulas, M., Metcalfe, A., Mix, Z., Richert, T., & Wagner, R. (2017). Meaningful functional change achieved from physical therapy provided in a student-run pro bono clinic. Journal of Allied Health, 46(3), 138–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabian, P. S., Dyson, J., & Levine, C. (2017). Physical therapist productivity using a collaborative clinical education model within an acute care setting: A longitudinal study. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 31(2), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F., Doig, E., Fleming, J., Strong, J., Birch, S., Whitehead, M. (2021). Student-resourced service delivery of occupational therapy rehabilitation groups: patient, clinician and student perspectives about the ingredients for success. Disability and Rehabilitation, pp. 1–12.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice: Sage publications.

  • Pigott, A., Patterson, F., Birch, S., Oakley, P., & Doig, E. (2022). The health service impact of an occupational therapy practice placement model: Student-resourced service delivery of groups. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 23(2), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirinen, A. (2016). The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. International Journal of Design, 10(3), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivko, S. E., Abbruzzese, L. D., Duttaroy, P., Hansen, R. L., & Ryans, K. (2016). Effect of physical therapy students’ clinical experiences on clinician productivity. Journal of Allied Health, 45(1), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • QSR International Pty Ltd. (2018). NVIVO (Version 12).

  • Reising, D. L., Allen, P. N., & Hall, S. G. (2006). Student and community outcomes in service-learning: Part 2–community outcomes. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(12), 516–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindflesch, A., Hake, M., Haack, R., Kleven, A., McPartlin, M., Strikwerda, J., & Hollman, J. (2018). Evaluating clinical performance of student physical therapists: A comparison of student-and staff-managed patient outcomes after hip arthroplasty. Journal of Allied Health, 47(3), 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romig, B. D., Tucker, A. W., Hewitt, A. M., & Maillet, J. O. S. (2017). The future of clinical education: Opportunities and challenges from allied health deans’ perspective. Journal of Allied Health, 46(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rone-Adams, S., Nof, L., Hart, D. L., Sandro, C. R., & Wang, Y.-C. (2009). Investigating physiotherapy and occupational therapy students’ outcome effectiveness. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(3), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, A., Alpert, H., & Karam-Hage, M. (2007). Smoking cessation delivered by medical students is helpful to homeless population. Academic Psychiatry, 31(5), 402–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickler, K., Sabus, C., Gustafson, H., Kueser, M., Lavaveshkul, B., & Denney, L. (2016). Pro-bono service through student-run clinics: How does physical therapy measure up? Journal of Allied Health, 45(3), 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L., Lo, K., & Maloney, S. (2018). What impact do students have on clinical educators and the way they practise? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(3), 611–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5 ed.): Sage Publications.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients, students, placement educators, allied health professionals and multidisciplinary team members who participated in this study. We would also like to acknowledge the work of the broader project team who contributed their expertise at various times throughout the project: Justine Dougherty, Christina Eagleton, Maria Quinlivan, Gerard Regan, Lily To, Reggie Daguio, Stephen Harvey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GN, TT, SM, MJ, MP, and BK contributed to the conception and design of the project. BB, LC, GN and SM lead the analysis of the qualitative data. TT led the analysis of the quantitative data. All authors were involved in the discussions for interpretation of the data. GN, TT, and SM drafted the initial versions of the manuscript with all authors contributing to subsequent versions by providing feedback. BB prepared the initial draft of Figure 1. TT prepared Figures 2-6. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Nisbet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Semi-structured focus group and interview guided questions and prompts related to impact on quality patient care

Students

Clinical Educators, Clinicians, managers and MDT

1. How do you think you have contributed to [insert discipline] services provided to patients?

Prompts:

a. Can you give an example to illustrate this? How were you involved?

b. What about to the patient’s journey through health system? What were your key contributions?

2. How do you think you have contributed to patient care outcomes?

Prompts:

a. Can you give an example to illustrate this?

b. What were your key contributions?

1. Compared with how you previously ran placements at your site / [insert allied health discipline] placements have previously run in your ward/ service/ unit, what do you see as the benefits of this current placement model?

Prompts:

  a. To how services are delivered?

    i. If so, can you give me an example?

  b. To patient care?

    ii. If so, can you give me an example?

2. Compared with how you previously ran placements at your site/ [insert allied health discipline] placements have previously run in your ward/ service/ unit, what do you see as the drawbacks or challenges of this current placement model?

Prompts:

  a. To how services are delivered?

    i If so, can you give me an example?

  b. To patient care?

    ii If so, can you give me an example?

3. Are these drawbacks or challenges ‘fixable’?

Clinical Educators only

4. How, if at all, have students contributed to patient care services? Can you give an example to illustrate this? How were the students involved?

Prompts:

  a. What about to the patient’s journey through health system?

  b. What about the range of services provided by students?

  c. Were any additional services provided by the students that would not have otherwise been provided?

5. How, if at all, have students contributed to patient care outcomes? Can you give an example to illustrate this?

Appendix 2

Items included in the Patient Experience Questionnaire (adapted from Bureau of Health Information New South Wales patient questionnaires) (Bureau of Health Information, 2017).

Item

Response options

Q1. Did your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] spend enough time with you during your hospital stay?

Yes, always

Yes, sometimes

No

Q2. Did your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] listen carefully to you?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

Q3. Did your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] explain things in a way you could understand?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

Q4. Did you have confidence and trust in your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist]?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

Q5. Did the treatment you received from [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] help you?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

Q6. Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about your [insert discipline] goals and treatment while you were in hospital?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

I was not well enough

I did not want to or need to be involved

Q7. Did your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] involve you about getting ready for leaving hospital?

Yes, definitely

Yes, to some extent

No

I was not well enough

I did not want to or need to be involved

Q8. Did your [insert discipline therapist/ student discipline therapist] make suggestions for any services you needed after you leave hospital?

Yes definitely

Yes to some extent

No

I was not well enough

I did not want to or need to be involved

Q9. Overall how would you rate the care you received from your so far during your stay in hospital?

Very good

Good

Neither good nor poor

Poor

Very poor

Q10. Do you have any other comments about the [insert discipline] care provided to you during this admission?

Open ended response

Appendix 3

Summary of results from Patient Experience Questionnaire

Question

Student responses

 

Response category

N value

%

Q1. Did your student [insert student discipline therapist] spend enough time with you during your hospital stay?

Yes, always

80

87.91%

Yes, sometimes

9

9.89%

No

1

1.10%

No answer

1

1.10%

Q2. Did your student [insert student discipline therapist] listen carefully to you?

Yes, always

85

93.41%

Yes, sometimes

4

4.40%

No

  

No answer

2

2.20%

Q3. Did your student [insert student discipline therapist] explain things in a way you could understand?

Yes, always

79

86.61%

Yes, sometimes

10

10.99%

No

1

1.10%

No answer

1

1.10%

Q4. Did you have confidence and trust in your student [insert student discipline therapist]?

Yes, always

82

90.11%

Yes, sometimes

7

7.69%

No

1

1.10%

No answer

1

1.10%

Q5. Did the treatment you received from your student [insert student discipline therapist] help you?

Yes, definitely

71

78.02%

Yes, to some extent

18

19.78%

No

  

No answer

2

2.20%

Q6. Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about your [insert student discipline therapist] goals and treatment while you were in hospital?

Yes, definitely

59

64.84%

Yes, to some extent

21

23.08%

No

  

I was not well enough

3

3.30%

I did not want to or need to be involved

1

1.10%

No answer

7

7.69%

Q7. Did your student [insert student discipline therapist] involve you about getting ready for leaving hospital?

Yes, definitely

54

59.34%

Yes, to some extent

26

28.57%

No

3

3.30%

I was not well enough

2

2.20%

I did not want to or need to be involved

  

No answer

6

6.59%

Q8. Did your student [insert student discipline therapist] make suggestions for any services or)[insert discipline] you needed after you leave hospital?

Yes, definitely

48

52.75%

Yes, to some extent

22

24.18%

No

9

9.89%

I was not well enough

4

4.40%

I did not want to or need to be involved

1

1.10%

No answer

7

7.69%

Q9. Overall how would you rate the care you received from your student [insert student discipline therapist] so far during your stay in hospital?

Very good

69

75.82%

Good

19

20.88%

Neither good nor poor

3

3.30%

Poor

 

Very poor

 

No answer

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nisbet, G., Thompson, T., McAllister, S. et al. From burden to benefit: a multi-site study of the impact of allied health work-based learning placements on patient care quality. Adv in Health Sci Educ 28, 759–791 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10185-9

Keywords

Navigation