Abstract
Are first impressions misleading? This commentary explores that question by drawing on the more general cognitive psychology literature aimed at understanding when, why, and how any non-analytic reasoning process can help or hurt decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequence: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274.
Barrows, H. S., Norman, G. R., Neufeld, V. R., & Feightner, J. W. (1982). The clinical reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clinical Investigative Medicine, 5, 49–56.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.
Eva, K. W. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39(1), 98–106.
Eva, K. W. (2013). Titles, Abstracts and Authors. In G. M. Hall (Ed.), How to write a paper (5th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Eva, K. W. (2018). Cognitive influences on complex performance assessment: Lessons from the interplay between medicine and psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 177–188.
Eva, K. W., & Cunnington, J. P. (2006). The difficulty with experience: Does practice increase susceptibility to premature closure. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(3), 192–198.
Eva, K. W., Neville, A. J., & Norman, G. R. (1998). Exploring the etiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Academic Medicine, 73(10 Suppl), S1–S5.
Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., Trinh, K., Wood, T. J., & Norman, G. R. (2012). Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examinations scores. Journal Of The American Medical Association, 308(21), 2233–2240.
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 61–76.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.
Klusmann, D., Knorr, M., & Hampe, W. (2022). Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: A pilot study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10151-5.
Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39(4), 418–427.
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. Bmj, 320, 768–770.
Schuwirth, L. W. T., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Medical Education, 46(1), 38–48.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.
Wood, T., Pugh, D., Touchie, C., Chan, J., & Humphrey-Murto, S. (2018). Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23, 721–732.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10151-5
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eva, K. To a fault. Adv in Health Sci Educ 28, 537–540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10181-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10181-z