Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

It’s a matter of trust: exploring the basis of program directors’ decisions about whether to trust a resident to care for a loved one

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been increased attention to and emphasis on competency-based medical education and the transformation from highly supervised medical students towards independent, entrustable physicians. We explored how program directors (PDs) justify decisions about whether they would trust finishing Post Graduate Year 1 (PGY1) residents to care for the PD or a loved one. Using an end of year survey with validity evidence, we assessed PDs’ responses (Yes, No, Not Sure) and written comments about this entrustment decision for USUHS medical students from graduating classes of 2013–2015 (PGY1). We performed a qualitative inductive content analysis to identify themes in how PDs justified their decisions as well as descriptive statistics and a contingency table analysis to examine associations between trust decisions and election to membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), or conversely, referral to the Student Promotions Committee (SPC) for remediation. Qualitative analyses revealed five themes related to this trust decision about medical residents: personal, interpersonal, knowledge, competence, and developmental. Neither AOA status, nor SPC referral status was significantly associated with the trust measure, overall, but positive trust decisions were significantly higher among those elected to AOA than in those who were not. Positive trust decisions were significantly associated with AOA status but negative trust decisions were not significantly associated with referral to the SPC. This study offers insights into what attributes may underpin trust decisions by PDs. Our findings suggest that PDs’ frequent use of personal and interpersonal characteristics to justify trust decisions contrasts with the use of clinical and knowledge based assessments during undergraduate medical education (UME), and emphasize the importance of critical intrinsic abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society Uniformed Services Chapter Bethesda, MD (n.d.) Retrieved September 10, 2017, from http://www.usuaoa.org/faq/.

  • Andolsek, K. M. (2016). Improving the medical student performance evaluation to facilitate resident selection. Academic Medicine,91(11), 1475–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyal, D. K., & Singh, T. (2017). Learning theories: The basics to learn in medical education. International Journal of Applied Basic Medical Research,7, S1–S3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowitz, S. S., Saulsbury, F. T., & Wilson, W. G. (2000). Information collected during the residency match process does not predict clinical performance. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine,154(3), 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education,15(1), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research,8(1), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury, R. J. (2016). Curriculum Inventory in Context—Effect of USMLE on U.S. Medical Education, 3(7). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, K. J., Arora, V. M., Barach, P., Johnson, J. K., & Farnan, J. M. (2014). How do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? A qualitative analysis. Journal of Hospital Medicine,9(3), 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, T., Durning, S. J., Gilliland, W. R., Swygert, K. A., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Development and initial validation of a program director’s evaluation form for medical school graduates. Military Medicine,180(4), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, S. J., Artino, A. R., Dong, T., Cruess, D. F., Gilliland, W. R., DeZee, K. J., et al. (2012). 40 years of military education: An overview of the long-term career outcome study (LTCOS). Military Medicine,177(Supplement 3), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, S. J., Pangaro, L. N., Lawrence, L. L., Waechter, D., McManigle, J., & Jackson, J. L. (2005). The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a program director’s (supervisor’s) evaluation form for medical school graduates. Academic Medicine,80(10), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1964). Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favreau, M. A., Tewksbury, L., Lupi, C., Cutrer, W. B., Jokela, J. A., & Yarris, L. M. (2017). Constructing a shared mental model for faculty development for the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Academic Medicine,92(6), 759–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4., New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation.

  • Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report,20(9), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, K. E., ten Cate, O., Boscardin, C., Irby, D. M., Iobst, W., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2014). Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice,19(3), 435–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. (2011). Educating physicians for the future: Carnegie’s calls for reform. Medical Teacher,33(7), 547–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, K. L. (2016). Numerical USMLE Step 1 scores are still important in the selection of residency applicants. Academic Medicine,91(11), 1470–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamel-El Sayed, S., & Loftus, S. (2018). Using and combining learning theories in medical education. Medical Science Educator,28(1), 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991a). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991b). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lypson, M., & Simpson, D. (2011). It all starts and ends with the program director. Journal of Graduate Medical Education,3(2), 261–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry,16(6), 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, T. M., & Omrod, J. E. (2004). Child development: Educating and working with children and adolescents (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, N. B., Hull, A., & Young, J. (2016). More on how USMLE Step 1 scores are challenging academic medicine. Academic Medicine,91, 609.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Residency Matching Program. (2014). Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2014 NRMP Program Director Survey. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pock, A. R., Pangaro, L. N., Green, C. B., & Laughlin, L. (2013). Undergraduate medical education: Past, present, and future. Military Medicine,178(5), 474–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, G. A., Vergel, J., Arredondo, M., Ariza, M. C., Gomez, P., & Pinzon-Barrios, A. M. (2016). Integrated medical curriculum: Advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Medical Education and Curriculum Development,3, 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. J., Jacob, T. M., & Sathyendra, S. (2016). Vertical integration of basic science in final year of medical education. International Journal of Applied Medical Research,6(3), 182–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S., Howard, B., Schlussel, Y. R., Lazarus, C. J., Wong, J. G., Moutier, C., et al. (2009). Does student membership in the Gold Humanism Honor Society influence selection for residency? Journal of Surgical Education,66(6), 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, D. J., Poynter, S., Burman, N., Elliott, S. P., Barnes, M., Gellin, C., et al. (in press). Justifications for discrepancies between competency committee and program director recommended resident supervisory roles. Academic Pediatrics.

  • Schuwirth, L. W., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher,33, 478–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, L., O’Sullivan, P. S., Aagaard, E. M., Tad-y, D., Harrell, H. E., Kogan, J. R., et al. (2016). How residents develop trust in interns: A multi-institutional mixed-methods study. Academic Medicine,91(10), 1406–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterkenberg, A., Barach, P., Kalkman, C., Gielen, M., & ten Cate, O. (2010). When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? Academic Medicine,85(9), 1408–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2005). Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Medical Education,39(12), 1176–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2013). Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of Graduate Medical Education,5(1), 157–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2016). Entrustment as assessment: Recognizing the ability, the right, and the duty to act. Journal of Graduate Medical Education,8(2), 261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., & Billett, S. (2014). Competency-based medical education: Origins, perspectives and potentialities. Medical Education,48(3), 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., Hart, D., Ankel, F., Busari, J., Englander, R., Glasgow, N., et al. (2016). Entrustment decision making in clinical training. Academic Medicine,91(2), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007). Viewpoint: Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Academic Medicine,82(6), 542–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., Snell, L., & Carraccio, C. (2010). Medical competence: The interplay between individual ability and the health care environment. Medical Teacher,32(8), 669–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, D. M., Daley, B. J., Sebastian, J. L., & Elnicki, D. M. (2006). Overview of current learning theories for medical education. The American Journal of Medicine,119(10), 903–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, C., Wolman, D., & Johns, M. (Eds.). (2008). Resident duty hours: Enhancing sleep, supervision, and safety. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Medical Licensing Examination. (2019). Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS). Retrieved July 28, 2019, from https://www.usmle.org/inCus/.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review,R00110, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle H. Yoon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer The opinions and assertions contained in this manuscript are strictly the private opinions of the authors, and not those of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Department of Defense (DoD), or the United States Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, M.H., Kurzweil, D.M., Durning, S.J. et al. It’s a matter of trust: exploring the basis of program directors’ decisions about whether to trust a resident to care for a loved one. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 691–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09953-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09953-x

Keywords

Navigation