Abstract
At a time when cognitive and behavioral theories dominated the landscape of learning theories, Lave and Wenger’s situated learning theory (SLT) opened new territory by illuminating social and cultural learning processes. Many researchers and educators in the health professions embraced this theory, but few have considered how SLT has been used and what has been learned or improved through its use in health professions education (HPE). In this scoping review, the authors examine these questions and consider opportunities for future work with SLT in HPE. The authors followed Levac’s modified scoping review framework. They conducted a search of CINAHL, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles referencing SLT or related concepts in HPE between 2006 and 2016. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, then screened full text for inclusion based on substantive treatment of SLT. Two authors extracted, analyzed and synthesized data from the final set of 193 articles. The authors identified two patterns of theory use. One sought an understanding of social learning processes in a specific context. The other aimed to design and/or evaluate interventions associated with communities of practice. These patterns are similar to other literatures (e.g., general education, healthcare, and organizational development) and, according to Lave and Wenger, may reflect confusion about the purpose, stance, and terminology of SLT. The authors discuss their findings in relation to primary source literature and consider opportunities for HPE researchers to employ and contribute to SLT going forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Albert, M., Hodges, B., & Regehr, G. (2007). Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Advances in Health Sciences Education,12(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2.
Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Barton, D., & Tusting, K. (2005). Beyond communities of practice: language, power and social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Barwick, M. A., Peters, J., & Boydell, K. (2009). Getting to uptake: Do communities of practice support the implementation of evidence-based practice? Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,18(1), 16–29.
Biesta, G., Allan, J., & Edwards, R. (2011). The theory question in research capacity building in education: towards an agenda for research and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies,59(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.599793.
Bleakley, A., Bligh, J., & Browne, J. (2011). Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bordage, G. (2009). Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Medical Education,43(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x.
Brown, J., Bearman, M., Kirby, C., Molloy, E., Colville, D., & Nestel, D. (2019). Theory, a lost character? As presented in general practice research papers. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13793.
Cantillon, P., D’Eath, M., De Grave, W., & Dornan, T. (2016). How do clinicians become teachers? A communities of practice perspective. Advances in Health Sciences Education,21(5), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9674-9.
Chen, H. C., Wamsley, M. A., Azzam, A., Julian, K., Irby, D. M., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2017). The health professions education pathway: Preparing students, residents, and fellows to become future educators. Teaching and Learning in Medicine,29(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1230500.
Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., et al. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education: Description, justification and clarification. Medical Education,42(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x.
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y. (2018). Medicine as a community of practice: Implications for medical education. Academic Medicine,93(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001826.
Engestrӧm, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work,14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747.
Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: a conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies,64(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799.
Fatmi, M., Hartling, L., Hillier, T., Campbell, S., & Oswald, A. E. (2013). The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher,35(12), e1608–e1624. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802.
Gandamihardja, T. A. K. (2014). The role of communities of practice in surgical education. Journal of Surgical Education,71(4), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.006.
Hardyman, W., Bullock, A., Brown, A., Carter-Ingram, S., & Stacey, M. (2013). Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC Medical Education,13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-6.
Hayes, A. L., Mansour, N., & Fisher, R. (2015). Understanding intercultural transitions of medical students. International Journal of Medical Education,6, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.54e7.b57f.
Hean, S., Anderson, L., Green, C., John, C., Pitt, R., & O’Halloran, C. (2016). Reviews of theoretical frameworks: Challenges and judging the quality of theory application. Medical Teacher,38(6), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1075648.
Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). A constructive critique of communities of practice: moving beyond Lave and Wenger. In Presented at the OVAL research seminar, Sydney, Australia. http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv37993. Accessed 31 August 2018.
Hughes, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2007). Communities of practice: a contested concept in flux. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: critical perspectives (pp. 1–16). Abingdon and New York: Routledge. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1507614/. Accessed 31 August 2018.
Hutchings, M., Scammell, J., & Quinney, A. (2013). Praxis and reflexivity for interprofessional education: Towards an inclusive theoretical framework for learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care,27(5), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.784729.
Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D. D., & Regehr, G. (2012). Competency is not enough: Integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Academic Medicine,87(9), 1185. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182604968.
Kell, C. (2014). Placement education pedagogy as social participation: What are students really learning?: Students’ learning on placement. Physiotherapy Research International,19(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1561.
Kennedy, T. J., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., & Lingard, L. A. (2009). ‘It’s a cultural expectation…’ the pressure on medical trainees to work independently in clinical practice. Medical Education,43(7), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03382.x.
Kumasi, K. D., Charbonneau, D. H., & Walster, D. (2013). Theory talk in the library science scholarly literature: An exploratory analysis. Library & Information Science Research,35(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.02.004.
Lave, J. (2008). Epilogue: Situated learning and changing practice. In A. Amin & J. Roberts (Eds.), Community, economic creativity, and organization (pp. 283–296). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lees, A., & Meyer, E. (2011). Theoretically speaking: Use of a communities of practice framework to describe and evaluate interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care,25(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.515429.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science,5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009a). Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science,4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-27.
Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009b). Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science,4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-11.
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education,1(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603252172.
Paradise, R., & Rogoff, B. (2009). Side by side: Learning by observing and pitching in. Ethos,37(1), 102–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01033.x.
Piquette, D., Mylopoulos, M., & LeBlanc, V. R. (2014). Clinical supervision and learning opportunities during simulated acute care scenarios. Medical Education,48(8), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12492.
Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J. J., Cunningham, F. C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2011). How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research,11(1), 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-273.
Rees, C. E., & Monrouxe, L. V. (2010). Theory in medical education research: How do we get there? Medical Education,44(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03615.x.
Reeves, S., Albert, M., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B.D. (2008). Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ, 337, a949. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a949
Reeves, S., Fletcher, S., Barr, H., Birch, I., Boet, S., Davies, N., et al. (2016). A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical Teacher,38(7), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663.
Regehr, G. (2010). It’s NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education: It’s NOT rocket science. Medical Education,44(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–165). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer, L. (2014). Communities of practice, a phenomenon to explain student development in community nursing. Primary Health Care Research & Development,15(04), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423613000455.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13
Smith, C. S., Francovich, C., Morris, M., Hill, W., Langlois-Winkle, F., Rupper, R., et al. (2010). Toward an ecological perspective of resident teaching clinic. Advances in Health Sciences Education,15(5), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9134-2.
Soffer, A. K. B. (2016). Situating beyond the social: Understanding the role of materiality in Danish nursing education. Advances in Health Sciences Education,21(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9668-7.
Spilg, E., Siebert, S., & Martin, G. (2012). A social learning perspective on the development of doctors in the UK National Health Service. Social Science and Medicine,75(9), 1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.014.
Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., et al. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher,38(8), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851.
Svensson, M. S., Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2009). Embedding instruction in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Sociology of Health & Illness,31(6), 889–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x.
Tax, C. L., Doucette, H., Neish, N. R., & Maillet, J. P. (2012). A model for cultivating dental hygiene faculty development within a community of practice. Journal of Dental Education,76(3), 311–321.
Teunissen, P. W. (2010). On the transfer of theory to the practice of research and education: Commentaries. Medical Education,44(6), 534–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03637.x.
Thomas, A., Lubarsky, S., Durning, S. J., & Young, M. E. (2017). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Demystifying scoping reviews. Academic Medicine,92(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452.
Thrysoe, L., Hounsgaard, L., Dohn, N. B., & Wagner, L. (2010). Participating in a community of practice as a prerequisite for becoming a nurse—trajectories as final year nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice,10(6), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.05.004.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
Van Schalkwyk, S. C., Bezuidenhout, J., & De Villiers, M. R. (2015). Understanding rural clinical learning spaces: Being and becoming a doctor. Medical Teacher,37(6), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.956064.
Varpio, L., Farnan, J. M., & Park, Y. S. (2017). Summary: Research diseases need holistic care. Academic Medicine,92(11), S7–S11.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization,7(2), 225–246.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review,78(1), 139–145.
Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2012). Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Medical Teacher,34(2), e102–e115. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741.
Acknowledgements
Evans Whitacker for assistance with search strategy and article retrieval. Leslie Floren, Holly Nishamura, and Patrick Yuan for assistance with initial screening and article retrieval.
Funding
Society for Directors of Research in Medical Education (SDRME).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Brien, B.C., Battista, A. Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 483–509 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
Keywords
- Communities of practice
- Health professions education
- Identity
- Legitimate peripheral participation
- Scoping review
- Situated learning