Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 739–749 | Cite as

Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning

  • Naomi SteenhofEmail author
  • Nicole N. Woods
  • Pascal W. M. Van Gerven
  • Maria Mylopoulos
Article

Abstract

Productive failure is an instructional approach that requires learners to struggle as they attempt to generate solutions to problems before, rather than after, receiving direct instruction on a targeted concept. Studies demonstrate that productive failure prepares students for later learning of new, related knowledge. Our study explored the effectiveness of productive failure as an instructional intervention in health professions education with respect to (a) acquisition and application of a novel concept, and (b) learners’ preparation for future learning of new, related content. Forty year-one students enrolled in the Doctor of Pharmacy program at the University of Toronto were randomly assigned to a productive failure (i.e. attempt to generate solutions before receiving instruction) or direct instruction only learning condition. After a practice phase, participants completed a series of tests designed to measure knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and preparation for future learning (new learning is required for successful problem solving). As expected, no difference in performance was seen between participants on the acquisition and application tests. However, participants in the productive failure condition outperformed those in the direct instruction condition on the preparation for future learning test. These results emphasize the role of struggle in learning and support the theory that engaging students in solving problems that are beyond their abilities can be a productive exercise in failure. The results suggest that productive failure assists learners in acquiring the conceptual knowledge needed to facilitate learning in the future.

Keywords

Adaptive expertise Clinical reasoning Innovation Pharmacy education Preparation for future learning Productive failure 

Notes

References

  1. Bjork, E., & Bjork, R. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. Gernsbacher & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1167267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harward University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cockcroft, D. W., & Gault, M. H. (1976). Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron, 16, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 552–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51, 289–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 45–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9235-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leppink, J. (2017). When I say … time on task. Medical Education, 51, 1101–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mamede, S., van Gog, T., van den Berge, K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., van Saase, J. L. C. M., van Guldener, C., et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA, 304(11), 1198–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mylopoulos, M., Brydges, R., Woods, N. N., Manzone, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2016). Preparation for future learning: A missing competency in health professions education? Medical Education, 50, 115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mylopoulos, M., Kulasegaram, K., & Woods, N. N. (2018). Developing the experts we need: Fostering adaptive expertise through education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(3), 674–677.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mylopoulos, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42, 975–981.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03153.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mylopoulos, M., & Woods, N. N. (2014). Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Medical Education, 48, 667–673.  https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mylopoulos, M., & Woods, N. N. (2017). When I say … adaptive expertise. Medical Education, 51(7), 685–686.  https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saposnik, G., Redelmeier, D., Ruff, C. C., & Tobler, P. N. (2016). Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1), 138.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz, D., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–5223.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz, D., Chase, C., Oppezzo, M., & Chin, D. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759–775.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwartz, D., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In T. M. Duffy & S. Tobias (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Schwartz, D., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Woods, N. N., & Mylopoulos, M. (2015). How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: From processing to preparation. Medical Education, 49, 952–953.  https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leslie Dan Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.The Wilson CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations