Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors’ experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?
Written tests for selection into medicine have demonstrated reliability and there is accumulating evidence regarding their validity, but we know little about the broader impacts or consequences of medical school selection tests from the perspectives of key stakeholders. In this first Australian study of its kind, we use consequential validity as a theoretical lens to examine how medical school students and applicants view and experience the Graduate Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT), and the consequences of testing. Participants (n = 447) were recruited from five graduate-entry medical schools across Australia and a publicly available online test preparation forum. An online survey was used to gather demographic information, and quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed via descriptive statistics and qualitative data were thematically analysed. The findings showed there was a considerable financial burden associated with preparing for and sitting the GAMSAT and moderate agreement regarding the GAMSAT as a fair selection method. The main unintended consequences of using the GAMSAT as a selection tool included barriers related to test affordability and language, and socialisation into the hidden curriculum of medicine. Selection tools such as the GAMSAT have some limitations when the goals are to support equitable participation in medicine and professional identity development. Our study highlights the value interpretive and theoretically-informed research in contributing to the evidence base on medical school selection.
KeywordsMedical school selection Written tests GAMSAT Consequential validity Qualitative
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) for funding this research.
The Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) funded this research.
- Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2017). Graduate medical school admissions test—Information booklet 2017. Retrieved January 3, 2017 from https://gamsat.acer.edu.au/files/GAMSAT_Information_Booklet.pdf.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). The Nature of enquiry: Setting the field, 7th ed., Chapter 1. In Research methods in education (pp. 3–30). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dhar, D., Perry, W., & Poole, P. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the undergraduate medicine and health sciences admissions test (UMAT). NZ Medical Journal, 125, 29–36.Google Scholar
- Donnelly, R. (2006). Graduate entry medicine in the UK: GAMSAT-based selection and learning outcomes. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Aptitude Tests for Admission to Medical School, 1–4 March 2006, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
- Groves, M. A., Gordon, J., & Ryan, G. (2007). Entry tests for graduate medical programs: Is it time to re-think? Medical Journal of Australia, 186, 120.Google Scholar
- Messick, S. (2000). Consequences of test interpretation and use: The fusion of validity and values in psychological assessment. In Problems and solutions in human assessment (pp. 3–20). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
- Patterson, F., Lievens, F., Kerrin, M., Zibarras, L., & Carette, B. (2012). Designing Selection Systems for Medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Selecting for Excellence Executive Group. (2014). Selecting for Excellence Final Report. Retrieved December 17, 2016 from http://www.medschools.ac.uk/AboutUs/Projects/Widening-Participation/Selecting-for-Excellence/Pages/Selecting-for-Excellence.aspx.
- Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, Number 3. Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, D., Zhang, J., Byrne, G. J., Luke, H., Ozolins, I. Z., Parker, M. H., et al. (2008). Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance. Medical Journal of Australia, 189, 235.Google Scholar