Pulling together and pulling apart: influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams
- 807 Downloads
Effective healthcare requires both competent individuals and competent teams. With this recognition, health professions education is grappling with how to factor team competence into training and assessment strategies. These efforts are impeded, however, by the absence of a sophisticated understanding of the the relationship between competent individuals and competent teams . Using data from a constructivist grounded theory study of team-based healthcare for patients with advanced heart failure, this paper explores the relationship between individual team members’ perceived goals, understandings, values and routines and the collective competence of the team. Individual interviews with index patients and their healthcare team members formed Team Sampling Units (TSUs). Thirty-seven TSUs consisting of 183 interviews were iteratively analysed for patterns of convergence and divergence in an inductive process informed by complex adaptive systems theory. Convergence and divergence were identifiable on all teams, regularly co-occurred on the same team, and involved recurring themes. Convergence and divergence had nonlinear relationships to the team’s collective functioning. Convergence could foster either shared action or collective paralysis; divergence could foster problematic incoherence or productive disruption. These findings advance our understanding of the complex relationship between the individual and the collective on a healthcare team, and they challenge conventional narratives of healthcare teamwork which derive largely from acute care settings and emphasize the importance of common goals and shared mental models. Complex adaptive systems theory helps us to understand the implications of these insights for healthcare teams’ delivery of care for the complex, chronically ill.
KeywordsTeamwork Collaboration Competence Complex chronic care Grounded theory Qualitative research
The study reported in this article was supporting by peer-reviewed grant funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO). We would like to thank the patients, family members and healthcare providers who participated in this study. Jeremy Chitpin provided support for the creation of narrative profiles during a summer research training program at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry.
The Heart Failure/Palliative Care Teamwork Research Group
is a multi-institutional group of co-investigators and collaborators who collaborated on this research project: The authors acknowledge the support from the Heart Failure/Palliative Care Teamwork Research group: Malcolm Arnold, Fred Burge, Samuel Burnett, Karen Harkness, Gil Kimel, Kori LaDonna, Donna Lowery, Denise Marshall, Allan McDougall, Robert McKelvie, Laura Nimmon, Stuart Smith, Patricia Strachan and Donna Ward.
- Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. In 1st Anchor Books. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Kernick, D. (2002). Complexity and healthcare organisation. In K. Sweeney & F. Griffiths (Eds.), Complexity and healthcare: An introduction (pp. 93–122). Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Lingard, L. (2012). Rethinking competence in the context of teamwork. In B. Hodges & L. Lingard (Eds.), The question of competence: Medical education in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Loeb, A. E. (2016). Teamstepps: A case study using a complex adaptive systems framework. Columbia University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10013899.Google Scholar
- McDougall, A. G. (2015). A sociomaterial analysis of team-based care for patients with advanced heart failure. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 3439.Google Scholar
- Paradis, E., Leslie, M., & Gropper, M. A. (2016). Interprofessional rhetoric and operational realities: An ethnographic study of rounds in four intensive care units. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory Practice, 21(4), 735–748. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9662-5. (Epub 2015 Dec 24).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rice, K., Zwarenstein, M., Conn, L. G., Kenaszchuk, C., Russell, A., & Reeves, S. (2010). An intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and communications: A comparative qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(4), 350–361. doi: 10.3109/13561820903550713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stacey, R. D. (2003). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R. D. (2006). Ways of thinking about public sector governance. In R. D. Stacey & D. Griffin (Eds.), Complexity and the experience of managing in public sector organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Weller, J. M., Cumin, D., Civil, I. D., Torrie, J., Garden, A., MacCormick, A. D., et al. (2016). Improved scores for observed teamwork in the clinical environment following a multidisciplinary operating room simulation intervention. New Zealand Medical Journal, 129(1439), 59–67.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, B., Lindberg, C., & Plesk, P. (2008). Edgeware: Lessons from complexity science for health care leaders (2nd ed.). Irving: V H A, Incorporated.Google Scholar