Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An undersupply of generalists doctors in rural communities globally led to widening participation (WP) initiatives to increase the proportion of rural origin medical students. In 2002 the Australian Government mandated that 25% of commencing Australian medical students be of rural origin. Meeting this target has largely been achieved through reduced standards of entry for rural relative to urban applicants. This initiative is based on the assumption that rural origin students will succeed during training, and return to practice in rural locations. One aim of this study was to determine the relationships between student geographical origin (rural or urban), selection scores, and future practice intentions of medical students at course entry and course exit. Two multicentre databases containing selection and future practice preferences (location and specialisation) were combined (5862), representing 54% of undergraduate medical students commencing from 2006 to 2013 across nine Australian medical schools. A second aim was to determine course performance of rural origin students selected on lower scores than their urban peers. Selection and course performance data for rural (461) and urban (1431) origin students commencing 2006–2014 from one medical school was used. For Aim 1, a third (33.7%) of rural origin students indicated a preference for future rural practice at course exit, and even fewer (6.7%) urban origin students made this preference. Results from logistic regression analyses showed significant independent predictors were rural origin (OR 4.0), lower Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) (OR 2.1), or lower Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test Section 3 (non-verbal reasoning) (OR 1.3). Less than a fifth (17.6%) of rural origin students indicated a preference for future generalist practice at course exit. Significant predictors were female gender (OR 1.7) or lower ATAR (OR 1.2), but not rural origin. Fewer (10.5%) urban origin students indicated a preference for generalist practice at course exit. For Aim 2, results of Mann–Whitney U tests confirmed that slightly reducing selection scores does not result in increased failure, or meaningfully impaired performance during training relative to urban origin students. Our multicentre analysis supports success of the rural origin WP pathway to increase rural student participation in medical training. However, our findings confirm that current selection initiatives are insufficient to address the continuing problem of doctor maldistribution in Australia. We argue for further reform to current medical student selection, which remains largely determined by academic meritocracy. Our findings have relevance to the selection of students into health professions globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The research on which the following section of the report is based used data provided by the Medical Schools Outcomes Database and Longitudinal Tracking (MSOD) Project, Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand Inc. We are grateful to the medical schools, medical students, graduates and doctors who participated. The MSOD project was possible due to funding made available by Health Workforce Australia (2011 onwards) and The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (2004–2011).

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Australian social trends, 2008. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Chapter3002008.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian social trends, 2013: Doctors and nurses. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20April+2013#p2.

  • Boelen, C. (1999). Adapting health care institutions and medical schools to societies’ needs. Academic Medicine, 74, S11–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Z. C. Y. (2015). Policy matters: medical education for whom? Are locally or globally trained doctors best? Medical Education, 49, 7–9. doi:10.1111/medu.12614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Grossman, J. H., & Hwang, J. (2009). The innovator’s prescription: A disruptive solution for health care. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. R., Freedman, S. B., Croft, A. J., Dalton, H. E., Luscombe, G. M., Brown, A. M., et al. (2013). Medical graduates becoming rural doctors: Rural background versus extended rural placement. Medical Journal of Australia, 199, 779–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J. A., Nicholson, S., Kelly, N., & Moffat, M. (2015). Taking context seriously: Explaining widening access policy enactments in UK Medical Schools. Medical Education, 49, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). The factors affecting the supply of health services and medical professionals in rural areas. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2010-13/rurhlth/report/index.

  • de Visser, M., Fluit, C., Fransen, J., Latijnhouwers, M., Cohen-Schotanus, J., & Laan, R. (2016). The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9681-x.

  • De Vries, E., & Reid, S. (2003). Do South African medical students of rural origin return to rural practice? South African Medical Journal, 93, 789–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, J., Norbury, M., Steven, K., & Guthrie, B. (2015). Widening access to medicine may improve general practitioner recruitment in deprived and rural communities: Survey of GP origins and current place of work Career choice, professional education and development. BMC Medical Education,. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0445-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, M., Godwin, M., Wilson, R., Hodgetts, G., Brown, G., Pong, R., et al. (2011). Rural background and clinical rural rotations during medical training: Effect on practice location. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160, 1159–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, D., & Young, L. (2009). Exploring the temperament and character traits of rural and urban doctors. The Journal of Rural Health, 31, e79–e84. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00197.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W. (2015). Moving beyond childish notions of fair and equitable. Medical Education, 49(1), 1–3. doi:10.1111/medu.12640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, J. P., & Landau, L. I. (2010). Driving change in rural workforce planning: The Medical School Outcome Database. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16, 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, D. (2015). Developing health care workforces for uncertain futures. Academic Medicine, 90, 400–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, D. F., Scott, P. J., & Poole, P. (2007). On the maldistribution of the medical workforce. Internal Medicine Journal, 37, 669–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, T., Kost, A., Evans, D. V., Norris, T., Erickson, J., McCarthy, J., et al. (2016). The WWAMI Targeted Rural Underserved Track (TRUST) program: An innovative response to rural physician workforce shortages. Academic Medicine, 91(1), 65–69. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, M., Warnecke, E., Hu, W., Griffin, B., Lay, D., Lichtwark, I., Tran, S., & Mercer, A. (2015, April). The predictive validity of the UMAT: A multi-institutional study. Paper presented at the Australasian student selection for the health professions conference, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Hayes, R. B., Lockhart, K. R., Teo, E., Smith, J., & Waynforth, D. (2015). Full medical program fees and medical career intention. Medical Journal of Australia, 202, 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. P., Bushnell, J. A., & Humphreys, J. S. (2014). Are rural placements positively associated with rural intentions in medical graduates? Medical Education, 48, 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. P., Humphreys, J. S., & Prideaux, D. (2009). Predicting medial students’ intentions to take up rural practice after graduation. Medical Education, 43, 1001–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkins, S., Michielsen, K., Iputo, J., Elsanousi, S., Mammen, M., Graves, L., et al. (2015). Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practice: International findings. Medical Education, 49, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laven, G., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Rural doctors and rural backgrounds: How strong is the evidence? A systematic literature review. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 11, 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. (2015). Diversity in medical school admission: Insights from personnel recruitment and selection. Medical Education, 49, 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail, M. R., Humphreys, J. S., & Joyce, C. M. (2011). Nature of association between rural background and practice location: A comparison of general practitioners and specialists. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand. (2015). MSOD and data linkage. Retrieved from May 4, 2015, from http://www.medicaldeans.org.au/projects-activities/msodproject/.

  • Medical Training Review Panel (MTRP) 18th Report. (2015). Australian Government Department of Health. Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN (print): 978-1-76007-162-2. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/work-pubs-mtrp-18.

  • Mercer, A., Hay, M., Simpson, K., Canny, B., Hodgson, W., & Puddey, I. (2015, April). Are selection scores and course outcomes related for undergraduate medical students? Paper presented at the Australasian student selection for the health professions conference, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2011). Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical Teacher, 33, 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moineau, G. (2015). On social accountability: When will we walk the talk? Medical Education, 49, 9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. A., Conaway, M. R., Bailey, B. A., & Hayden, G. F. (2007). Predicting rural practice using different definitions to classify medical school applicants as having a rural upbringing. Journal of Rural Health, 23, 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F., Prescott-Clements, L., Zibarras, L., Edwards, H., Kerrin, M., & Cousans, F. (2015). Recruiting for values in healthcare: A preliminary review of the evidence. Advances in Health Science Education,. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9579-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playford, D. E., Evans, S. F., Atkinson, D. N., Auret, K. A., & Riley, G. J. (2014). Impact of the Rural Clinical School of Western Australia on work location of medical graduates. Medical Journal of Australia, 200, 104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P., & Shulruf, B. (2013). Shaping the future medical workforce: Take care with selection tools. Journal of Primary Health Care, 5, 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P., Shulruf, B., Rudland, J., & Wilkinson, T. (2012). Comparison of UMAT scores and GPA in prediction of performance in medical school: A national study. Medical Education, 46, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powis, D. (2014). Selecting medical students: An unresolved challenge. Medical Teacher, 37, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puddey, I. B., Mercer, A., Playford, D. E., Pougnault, S., & Riley, G. J. (2014). Medical student selection criteria as predictors of intended rural practice following graduation. BMC Medical Education, 14, 1–12. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puddey, I. B., Mercer, A., Playford, D. E., & Riley, G. J. (2015). Medical student selection criteria and socio-demographic factors as predictors of ultimately working rurally after graduation. BMC Medical Education, 15, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0359-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, H. K., Diamond, J. J., Markham, F. W., & Santana, A. J. (2012). The relationship between entering medical students’ backgrounds and career plans and their rural practice outcomes three decades later. Academic Medicine, 87(4), 493–497. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182488c06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razack, S., Hodges, B., Steinert, Y., & Maguire, M. (2015). Seeking inclusion in an exclusive process: Discourse of medical schools student selection. Medical Education, 49, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseamelia, C., Greenwald, J. L., Bush, T., Pratte, M., Wilcox, J., & Morley, C. P. (2014). A qualitative study of medical students in a rural track: Views on eventual rural practice. Family Medicine, 46(4), 259–266. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84898890472&partnerID=40&md5=95436d3c8ad5b921658560e7d2b2eb5b.

  • Sandhu, G. (2015). When I say… social accountability in medical education. Medical Education, 49(1), 23–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulruf, B., Poole, P., Wang, G., Rudland, J., & Wilkinson, T. (2012). How well do selection tools predict performance later in a medical programme? Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 17, 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. L., Scicluna, H. A., Jones, P. D., Cole, A. M., O’Sullivan, A. J., Harris, P. G., et al. (2014). Predictive validity of a new integrated selection process for medical school admission. BMC Medical Education, 14, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skochelak, S. E., & Stack, S. J. (2016). Creating the medical schools of the future. Academic Medicine,. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, E., Kelly, B. J., & Symonds, I. M. (2015). Disadvantage and the ‘capacity to aspire’ to medical school. Medical Education, 49, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. E., Brokaw, J. J., Zollinger, T. W., Wilson, J. S., Springer, J. R., Deal, W. W., et al. (2007). Influence of hometown on family physicians’ choice to practice in rural settings. Family Medicine, 39, 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, A. L., Phillips, J., Short, W., Fahey, C., Mavis, B. (2016). Thirty years training rural physicians: outcomes from the michigan state university college of human medicine rural physician program. Academic Medicine, 91(1), 113–119. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., Zhang, J., & Parker, M. (2011). Predictive validity of the Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test for medical students’ academic performance. Medical Journal of Australia, 194, 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, I. G., Roberts, C., Flynn, E. M., & Griffin, B. (2012). Only the best: Medical student selection in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 196, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the UMAT Consortium for funding the UMAT Multicentre Predictive Validity Study.

Author’s contributions

MH and AM are chief investigators of the UMAT Multicentre Predictive Validity Study. MH wrote the first draft of the paper, and all listed authors contributed to subsequent drafts. ST and IL manage the UMAT study database and conducted the statistical analysis. WH, HTA, EA, and DG made significant contributions to the broader policy issues addressed in the discussion, and which motivated and framed this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hay, M., Mercer, A.M., Lichtwark, I. et al. Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia. Adv in Health Sci Educ 22, 533–551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9727-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9727-0

Keywords

Navigation