What makes a ‘good group’? Exploring the characteristics and performance of undergraduate student groups
Group work forms the foundation for much of student learning within higher education, and has many educational, social and professional benefits. This study aimed to explore the determinants of success or failure for undergraduate student teams and to define a ‘good group’ through considering three aspects of group success: the task, the individuals, and the team. We employed a mixed methodology, combining demographic data with qualitative observations and task and peer evaluation scores. We determined associations between group dynamic and behaviour, demographic composition, member personalities and attitudes towards one another, and task success. We also employed a cluster analysis to create a model outlining the attributes of a good small group learning team in veterinary education. This model highlights that student groups differ in measures of their effectiveness as teams, independent of their task performance. On the basis of this, we suggest that groups who achieve high marks in tasks cannot be assumed to have acquired team working skills, and therefore if these are important as a learning outcome, they must be assessed directly alongside the task output.
KeywordsAssessment Group work Small group learning Small group teaching Teamwork
Cartoon drawings in Fig. 4 were kindly provided by Julia Sands. We would like to thank Ruth Serlin, Maria O’Conor and Jo Fisher for their help with data collection.
- Adair, J. (1973). Action centred leadership. USA: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
- BBC. (1994). Team working. London: BBC for Business.Google Scholar
- Belbin, M. (1981). Management teams. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Bollinger, L. C. (2003). The need for diversity in higher education. Academic Medicine, 78(5), 431–436.Google Scholar
- Chong, E. (2007). Role balance and team development: A study of team role characteristics underlying high and low performing teams. Journal of Behavioural and Applied Management, 8, 202–217.Google Scholar
- Delany, C., Miller, K. J., El-Ansary, D., Remedios, L., Hosseini, A., & McLeod, S. (2015). Replacing stressful challenges with positive coping strategies: A resilience program for clinical placement. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(5), 1303–1324.Google Scholar
- Doyle, T. (2011). Learner-centred teaching. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
- Edmonson, A. (2012). Teamwork on the fly. Harvard Business Review. April Issue. Accessed 1 October 2015. https://hbr.org/2012/04/teamwork-on-the-fly-2#.
- Hackman, J. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work [and those that don’t]: Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
- Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Michael, J. A. (2001). In pursuit of meaningful learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 25, 145–158.Google Scholar
- Overbeck, J. R., Correll, J., & Park, B. (2003). Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 7, 171–202.Google Scholar
- Sockalingham, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). Characteristics of problems in problem based learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33.Google Scholar
- Stajovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(814), 28.Google Scholar
- Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, B. M., Haider, P., Borges, N. J., Carchedi, L. R., Roman, B. J. B., Townsend, M. H., et al. (2015). Team cohesiveness, team size and team performance in team-based learning teams. Medical Education, 49, 370–385.Google Scholar
- Topham, P., & Russell, G. (2012). Social anxiety in higher education. The Psychologist, 25(4), 280–282.Google Scholar