Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 1113–1121 | Cite as

A literature review on observational learning for medical motor skills and anesthesia teaching

Review

Abstract

Motor skill practice is very important to improve performance of medical procedures and could be enhanced by observational practice. Observational learning could be particularly important in the medical field considering that patients’ safety prevails over students’ training. The mechanism of observational learning is based on the mirror neuron system, originally discovered in the monkey pre-motor cortex. Today we know that humans have a similar system, and its role is to understand and reproduce the observed actions of others. Many studies conclude that humans are able to plan and to make movements based on visual information by mapping a representation of observed actions, especially when the motor system is committed to do it. Moreover most researchers considered observational learning effective for complex skills, such as medical procedures. Additionally, observational learning could play a relevant role during anesthesia training since the learner works in pairs most of the time (dyad practice). Some teaching approaches should be taken into consideration: an implicit engagement of the observer motor system is required, immediate feedback seems to have an important effect, and a combination of observational and physical practice could be better than physical practice alone. In an environment where effectiveness and efficacy are essential, observational learning seems to fit well.

Keywords

Observational learning Dyad practice Motor skills Medical procedures Anesthesia 

References

  1. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2005). Observational learning: Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(3), 211–216. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15883118. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.
  3. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2010). Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: The similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42(4), 257–268. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20862778. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.
  4. Bathalon, S., et al. (2005). Cognitive skills analysis, kinesiology, and mental imagery in the acquisition of surgical skills. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(05), 328. http://journals.bcdecker.com/CrossRef/showText.aspx?path=JOT/volume34%2C2005/issue05%2CSeptember/jot_2005_34506/jot_2005_34506.xml.
  5. Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., & Fink, G. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400–404.Google Scholar
  7. Cochin, S., Barthelemy, C., Roux, S., & Martineau, J. (1999). Observation and execution of movement: Similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalograpy. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1839–1842.Google Scholar
  8. Custers, E. J., Regehr, G., & McCulloch, W. (1999). The effects of modeling on learning a simple surgical procedure: See one, do one or see many, do one? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory Practice, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Pellegrino, G., et al. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, D., et al. (2011). Action representations in perception, motor control and learning: Implications for medical education. Medical Education, 45(2), 119–31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21166837. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.
  11. Gastaut, H., & Bert, J. (1954). No title: EEG changes during cinematographic presentation. Eletroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 6, 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R., & Brass, M. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Janelle, C., et al. (2003). Mechanisms of attentional cueing during observational learning to facilitate motor skill acquisition. Journal of Sports Science, 21(10), 825–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kantak, S., & Winstein, C. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly, S., et al. (2003). Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, T., & White, M. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maeda, F., Kleiner-Fisman, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: Specificity of the effect and role of observer’s orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 1329–1335.Google Scholar
  18. Mattar, A. A. G., & Gribble, P. L. (2005). Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46(1), 153–160. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15820701. Accessed 28 Aug 2014.
  19. McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R., & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 17(2), 475–513.Google Scholar
  20. Moulton, C., et al. (2006). Teaching surgical skills: What kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 244(3), 400–409.Google Scholar
  21. Nishitani, N., & Hari, R. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patuzzo, S., Fiaschi, A., & Manganotti, P. (2003). Modulation of motor cortex excitability in the left hemisphere during action observation: A single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study of self-and non-self action observation. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1272–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petrosini, L., Graziano, A., & Mandolesi, L. (2003). Watch how to do it! New advances in learning by observation. Brain Research Reviews, 42(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15217330. Accessed 9 July 2014.
  25. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shea, C. H., et al. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 27–36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11008269. Accessed 27 Nov 2014.
  27. Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31(2), 119–125. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11177626. Accessed 20 Oct 2014.
  28. Shebilske, W., Regian, J., & Arthur, W. (1992). A dyad protocol for training complex skills. Human Factors, 34, 369–374.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, A. M., Mannion, S., & Iohom, G. (2013). Irish medical students knowledge and perception of anaesthesia. Education in Medicine Journal, 5(2), 83–88. http://www.eduimed.com/index.php/eimj/article/view/144. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.
  30. Watkins, K., Strafella, A., & Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia, 41, 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. (1994). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau and Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 987–1006.Google Scholar
  33. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75–84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078758. Accessed 19 July 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Master of Sciences in Health Sciences Education (in Progress)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Anesthesia DepartmentMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations