Skip to main content
Log in

A literature review on observational learning for medical motor skills and anesthesia teaching

  • Review
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor skill practice is very important to improve performance of medical procedures and could be enhanced by observational practice. Observational learning could be particularly important in the medical field considering that patients’ safety prevails over students’ training. The mechanism of observational learning is based on the mirror neuron system, originally discovered in the monkey pre-motor cortex. Today we know that humans have a similar system, and its role is to understand and reproduce the observed actions of others. Many studies conclude that humans are able to plan and to make movements based on visual information by mapping a representation of observed actions, especially when the motor system is committed to do it. Moreover most researchers considered observational learning effective for complex skills, such as medical procedures. Additionally, observational learning could play a relevant role during anesthesia training since the learner works in pairs most of the time (dyad practice). Some teaching approaches should be taken into consideration: an implicit engagement of the observer motor system is required, immediate feedback seems to have an important effect, and a combination of observational and physical practice could be better than physical practice alone. In an environment where effectiveness and efficacy are essential, observational learning seems to fit well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2005). Observational learning: Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(3), 211–216. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15883118. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.

  • Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2010). Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: The similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42(4), 257–268. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20862778. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.

  • Bathalon, S., et al. (2005). Cognitive skills analysis, kinesiology, and mental imagery in the acquisition of surgical skills. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(05), 328. http://journals.bcdecker.com/CrossRef/showText.aspx?path=JOT/volume34%2C2005/issue05%2CSeptember/jot_2005_34506/jot_2005_34506.xml.

  • Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., & Fink, G. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochin, S., Barthelemy, C., Roux, S., & Martineau, J. (1999). Observation and execution of movement: Similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalograpy. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1839–1842.

  • Custers, E. J., Regehr, G., & McCulloch, W. (1999). The effects of modeling on learning a simple surgical procedure: See one, do one or see many, do one? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory Practice, 4(2), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pellegrino, G., et al. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., et al. (2011). Action representations in perception, motor control and learning: Implications for medical education. Medical Education, 45(2), 119–31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21166837. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.

  • Gastaut, H., & Bert, J. (1954). No title: EEG changes during cinematographic presentation. Eletroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 6, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R., & Brass, M. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janelle, C., et al. (2003). Mechanisms of attentional cueing during observational learning to facilitate motor skill acquisition. Journal of Sports Science, 21(10), 825–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantak, S., & Winstein, C. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., et al. (2003). Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., & White, M. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, F., Kleiner-Fisman, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: Specificity of the effect and role of observer’s orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 1329–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattar, A. A. G., & Gribble, P. L. (2005). Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46(1), 153–160. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15820701. Accessed 28 Aug 2014.

  • McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R., & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 17(2), 475–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, C., et al. (2006). Teaching surgical skills: What kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 244(3), 400–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, N., & Hari, R. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 913–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patuzzo, S., Fiaschi, A., & Manganotti, P. (2003). Modulation of motor cortex excitability in the left hemisphere during action observation: A single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study of self-and non-self action observation. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1272–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosini, L., Graziano, A., & Mandolesi, L. (2003). Watch how to do it! New advances in learning by observation. Brain Research Reviews, 42(3), 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15217330. Accessed 9 July 2014.

  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, C. H., et al. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 27–36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11008269. Accessed 27 Nov 2014.

  • Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31(2), 119–125. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11177626. Accessed 20 Oct 2014.

  • Shebilske, W., Regian, J., & Arthur, W. (1992). A dyad protocol for training complex skills. Human Factors, 34, 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. M., Mannion, S., & Iohom, G. (2013). Irish medical students knowledge and perception of anaesthesia. Education in Medicine Journal, 5(2), 83–88. http://www.eduimed.com/index.php/eimj/article/view/144. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.

  • Watkins, K., Strafella, A., & Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia, 41, 989–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. (1994). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau and Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 987–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(2), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75–84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078758. Accessed 19 July 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article was initially a paper course for the Master of Science in Health Science Education program at Mc Master University. Later, the article was reviewed and edited by the second author prior to submission for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ligia Cordovani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cordovani, L., Cordovani, D. A literature review on observational learning for medical motor skills and anesthesia teaching. Adv in Health Sci Educ 21, 1113–1121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9646-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9646-5

Keywords

Navigation