General practice registrars in Australia undertake most of their vocational training in accredited general practices. They typically see patients alone from the start of their community-based training and are expected to seek timely ad hoc support from their supervisor. Such ad hoc encounters are a mechanism for ensuring patient safety, but also provide an opportunity for learning and teaching. Wenger’s (Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998) social theory of learning (‘communities of practice’) guided a secondary analysis of audio-recordings of ad hoc encounters. Data from one encounter is re-presented as an extended sequence to maintain congruence with the theoretical perspective and enhance vicariousness. An interpretive commentary communicates key features of Wenger’s theory and highlights the researchers’ interpretations. We argue that one encounter can reveal universal understandings of clinical supervision and that the process of naturalistic generalisation allows readers to transfer others’ experiences to their own contexts. The paper raises significant analytic, interpretive, and representational issues. We highlight that report writing is an important, but infrequently discussed, part of research design. We discuss the challenges of supporting the learning and teaching that arises from adopting a socio-cultural lens and argue that such a perspective importantly captures the complex range of issues that work-based practitioners have to grapple with. This offers a challenge to how we research and seek to influence work-based learning and teaching in health care settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We could have chosen a number of theoretical perspectives to re-analyse the data. As well as appearing to have a good fit with the data, we had a more personal motive for using Wenger’s (1998) theory, which was the challenge of developing a good understanding of Wenger’s concepts.
This quotation supports the point we are trying to make, but we are a little bit uncomfortable about the reference to culture. Culture and community of practice undoubtedly share a lot of concepts, but Wenger (1998) argues that the concepts are different. Some articles that are ostensibly about communities of practice move too freely between the terms (e.g. Fuller et al. 2005), when it makes sense to preserve Wenger’s distinction.
Language is a repertoire that people draw on. Sometimes it is worth pointing out the seemingly obvious; which in this case is that the encounter is peppered with medical terms that indicate a speaker’s medical identity.
Liddy is referencing another group that she is part of; her peers in the training program; a forum that is referenced again later in the encounter. As part their training, registrars have to attend a number of face-to-face workshops.
Aagaard, E., Teherani, A., & Irby, D. M. (2004). Effectiveness of the one-minute preceptor model for diagnosing the patient and the learner: Proof of concept. Academic Medicine, 79(1), 42–49.
Abma, T. A., & Stake, R. E. (2014). Science of the particular: An advocacy of naturalistic case study in health research. Qualitative Health Research, 24(8), 1150–1161.
Ajjawi, R., & Bearman, M. (2012). Sociomateriality matters to family practitioners as supervisors. Medical Education, 46, 1145–1147.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00305.
Atkinson, P. (1992). The ethnography of a medical setting: Reading, writing, and rhetoric. Qualitative Health Research, 2(4), 451–474.
Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical talk and medical work. London: Sage.
Bernabeo, E. C., Reddy, S. G., Ginsburg, S., & Holmboe, E. S. (2014). Professionalism and maintenance of certification: Using vignettes describing interpersonal dilemmas to stimulate reflection and learning. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34(2), 112–122.
Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 27–43.
Blauner, B. (1987). Problem’s of editing “first-person” sociology. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 46–64.
Bleakley, A. (2006). Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Medical Education, 40, 150–157.
Bleakley, A., Bligh, J., & Browne, J. (2011). Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. London: Springer.
Boendermaker, P. M., Schuling, J., Jong, B. M.-D., Zwierstra, R. P., & Metz, J. C. (2000). What are the characteristics of the competent general practitioner trainer? Family Practice, 17(6), 547–553. doi:10.1093/fampra/17.6.547.
Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.2307/1176008.
Buchel, T. L., & Edwards, F. D. (2005). Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Family Medicine, 37(1), 30–35.
Catchpole, M., Albert, E., Lake, F. R., & Brown, T. (2005). Teaching on the run: General practice training between consultations. Australian Family Physician, 34(12), 47–50.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davis, J. M. (2000). Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: Research strategies and roles for promoting social change? Disability & Society, 15(2), 191–206.
Diamond, M. R., Kamien, M., Sim, M. G. B., & Davis, J. (1995). A critical incident study of general practice trainees in their basic general practice term. The Medical Journal of Australia, 162(20 March), 321–324.
Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 526–542). London: Sage.
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Eteläpelto, A. (2008). Perspectives, prospects and progress in work-related learning. In S. Billett, C. Hariesis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 233–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Farrell, E., Kypreos, H., Wong, E., & Vergara, E. (2013). In-practice teaching resource. Melbourne: General Practice Registrars Australia.
Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., Hodkinson, P., & Unwin, L. (2005). Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: A reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 49–68. doi:10.1080/0141192052000310029.
General Practice Education and Training. (2010). PGPPP (Practice) guidelines for the supervision and training of doctors in the Prevocational General Practice Placements Program. Canberra: General Practice Education and Training Limited.
Handy, C. (1993). Understanding organizations (4th ed.). London: Penguin.
Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408–424.
Hodges, B. (2003). OSCE! Variations on a theme by Harden. Medical Education, 37(12), 1134–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2003.01717.x.
Ingham, G. (2012). Avoiding ‘consultation interruptus’. Australian Family Physician, 41(8), 627–629.
Irby, D. M., & Wilkerson, L. (2008). Teaching when time is limited. British Medical Journal, 336, 384–387.
Kaufman, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (2014). Teaching and learning in medical education: How theory can inform practice. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 7–29). Chichester: Wiley.
Kennedy, T. J., Lingard, L., Baker, G. R., Kitchen, L., & Regehr, G. (2007). Clinical oversight: Conceptualising the relationship between supervision and safety. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1080–1085.
Kennedy, T. J. T., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., & Lingard, L. (2009). Preserving professional credibility: Grounded theory study of medical trainees’ requests for clinical support. British Medical Journal, 338(b128), 1–7.
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 118–134). London: Sage.
Lake, F. R., & Ryan, G. (2004). Teaching on the run tips 3: Planning a teaching episode. Medical Journal of Australia, 180(21 June), 643–644.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lingard, L., Schryer, C., Garwood, K., & Spafford, M. (2003). ‘Talking the talk’: School and workplace genre tension in clerkship case presentations. Medical Education, 37, 612–620.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Monrouxe, L. V. (2010). Identity, identification and medical education: Why should we care? Medical Education, 44(1), 40–49. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03440.x.
Morrison, J., Clement, T., Brown, J., & Nestel, D. (2014). Ad hoc supervisory encounters between GP-supervisors and GP-registrars: Enhancing quality and effectiveness. Warrnambool: Southern GP Training.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme working paper series. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
Pearce, C. (2003). Corridor teaching: ‘Have you got a minute…?’. Australian Family Physician, 32(9), 745–747.
Pearce, R., Laurence, C. O., Black, L. E., & Stocks, N. (2007). The challenges of teaching in a general practice setting. Medical Journal of Australia, 187(2), 129–132.
Pearson, D. J., & Lucas, B. J. (2011). Engagement and opportunity in clinical learning: Findings form a case study in primary care. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 670–677.
Prentice, R. (2013). Bodies in formation: An ethnograpy of anatomy and surgery education. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
QSR International. (1999–2012). NVIVO10. Doncaster: QSR International Pty Ltd.
Rees, C. E., Ajjawi, R., & Monrouxe, L. V. (2013). The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: A video observation study. Medical Education, 47(2), 154–165. doi:10.1111/medu.12055.
Rizan, C., Elsey, C., Lemon, T., Grant, A., & Monrouxe, L. V. (2014). Feedback in action within bedside teaching encounters: A video ethnographic study. Medical Education, 48(9), 902–920. doi:10.1111/medu.12498.
Simons, H. (1996). The paradox of case study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 225–240.
Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity. London: FT/Prentice Hall.
Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(5), 5–8.
Sterkenburg, A., Barach, P., Kalkman, C., Gielen, M., & ten Cate, O. (2010). When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? Academic Medicine, 85(9), 1408–1417.
Steven, K., Wenger, E., Boshuizen, H., Scherpbier, A., & Dornan, T. (2014). How clerkship students learn from real patients in practice settings. Academic Medicine, 89(3), 1–8.
Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (2012). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis (2nd ed.). Melton Mowbray: Lifespace Publishing.
Thorne, S. (1994). Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 263–279). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
van der Zwet, J., de la Croix, A., de Jonge, L. P. J. W. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., & Teunissen, P. W. (2014a). The power of questions: A discourse analysis about doctor–student interaction. Medical Education, 48(8), 806–819. doi:10.1111/medu.12493.
van der Zwet, J., Dornan, T., Teunissen, P. W., de Jonge, L. P. J. W. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2014b). Making sense of how physician preceptors interact with medical students: Discourses of dialogue, good medical practice, and relationship trajectories. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19, 85–98.
van der Zwet, J., Zwietering, P. J., Teunissen, P. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Workplace learning from a socio-cultural per. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 359–373.
Verbakel, N. J., van Melle, M., Langelaan, M., Verheij, T. J. M., Wagner, C., & Zwart, D. L. M. (2014). Exploring patient safety culture in primary care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(6), 585–591.
Ward, D. J., Furber, C., Tierney, S., & Swallow, V. (2013). Using framework analysis in nursing research: A worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2423–2431.
Wearne, S., Dornan, T., Teunissen, P. W., & Skinner, T. (2012). General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: An integrative review. Medical Education, 46(12), 1161–1173. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04348.x.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. London: Sage.
We thank the supervisor and registrar participants, along with the staff of the respective practices. We gratefully acknowledge the research grant received from General Practice Education and Training Ltd (GPET).
About this article
Cite this article
Clement, T., Brown, J., Morrison, J. et al. Ad hoc supervision of general practice registrars as a ‘community of practice’: analysis, interpretation and re-presentation. Adv in Health Sci Educ 21, 415–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9639-4
- Ad hoc supervision
- Clinical supervision
- Communities of practice
- General practice
- Legitimate peripheral participation
- Naturalistic generalisation
- Situated learning
- Socio-cultural theory